Visual function in eyes with diffractive extended depth-of-focus and monofocal intraocular lenses: 2-year comparison.
Contrast sensitivity
Extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens
Functional visual acuity
Long term
Visual function
Journal
Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie
ISSN: 1435-702X
Titre abrégé: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8205248
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
22
12
2022
accepted:
24
03
2023
revised:
15
03
2023
medline:
17
8
2023
pubmed:
19
4
2023
entrez:
18
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare long-term visual function after implantation of diffractive extended depth-of-focus (EDF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) using echelett optics and monofocal IOLs with the same platform. In this prospective comparative case series, diffractive EDF or monofocal IOLs were implanted binocularly and followed up for 2 years. At the last visit, distance-corrected binocular visual acuities were measured at distances of 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1, 2, 3, and 5 m. Photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity was also examined. Dynamic visual function was evaluated in terms of functional visual acuity (FVA), standard deviation of visual acuity (SDVA), visual maintenance ratio (VMR), mean response time, and number of blinks. The outcomes were compared between the two IOLs, and the influence of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) on contrast sensitivity and FVA was examined. Binocular visual acuity of eyes with EDF IOLs was better at distances of 0.5 and 0.7 m than that of eyes with monofocal IOL (P < 0.026). There were no differences in binocular visual acuity at other distances, contrast sensitivities, or dynamic visual functions. The influence of PCO on the visual functions was not found in eyes with EDF IOLs. Up to 2 years postoperatively, eyes with diffractive EDF IOLs sustained superior intermediate visual acuity together with visual function comparable to that of eyes with monofocal IOLs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37071152
doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06051-y
pii: 10.1007/s00417-023-06051-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2567-2573Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Cochener B, Concerto Study Group (2016) Clinical outcomes of a new extended range of vision intraocular lens: International Multicenter Concerto Study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 42:1268–1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.06.033
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.06.033
pubmed: 27697244
Ota Y, Bissen-Miyajima H, Nakamura K, Hirasawa M, Minami K (2020) Binocular visual function after staged implantation of extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens targeting emmetropia and -0.5 diopter: a prospective comparison. PloS One 15:e0238135. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238135
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238135
pubmed: 32841287
pmcid: 7447018
Millán MS, Vega F (2017) Extended depth of focus intraocular lens: chromatic performance. Biomed Opt Express 8:4294–4309. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.004294
doi: 10.1364/BOE.8.004294
pubmed: 28966865
pmcid: 5611941
Pedrotti E, Bruni E, Bonacci E, Badalamenti R, Mastropasqua R, Marchini G (2016) Comparative analysis of the clinical outcomes with a monofocal and an extended range of vision intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 32:436–442. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20160428-06
doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160428-06
pubmed: 27400074
Pedrotti E, Carones F, Aiello F, Mastropasqua R, Bruni E, Bonacci E et al (2018) Comparative analysis of visual outcomes with 4 intraocular lenses: monofocal, multifocal, and extended range of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg 44:156–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.11.011
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.11.011
pubmed: 29587972
Alio JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Férnandez-Buenaga R, Pikkel J, Maldonado M (2017) Multifocal intraocular lenses: an overview. Surv Ophthalmol 62:611–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.03.005
doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.03.005
pubmed: 28366683
de Vries NE, Nuijts RM (2013) Multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: literature review of benefits and side effects. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:268–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.12.002
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.12.002
pubmed: 23332253
Biber JM, Sandoval HP, Trivedi RH, de Castro LE, French JW, Solomon KD (2009) Comparison of the incidence and visual significance of posterior capsule opacification between multifocal spherical, monofocal spherical, and monofocal aspheric intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1234–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.03.013
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.03.013
pubmed: 19545814
Yoo YS, Whang WJ, Byun YS, Piao JJ, Kim DY, Joo CK, Yoon G (2018) Through-focus optical bench performance of extended depth-of-focus and bifocal intraocular lenses compared to a monofocal lens. J Refract Surg 34:236–243. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20180206-04
doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180206-04
pubmed: 29634838
Wakamatsu TH, Yamaguchi T, Negishi K, Kaido M, Matsumoto Y, Ishida R, Kojima T, Ibrahim OM, Saiki M, Dogru M, Tsubota K (2011) Functional visual acuity after neodymium: YAG laser capsulotomy in patients with posterior capsule opacification and good visual acuity preoperatively. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:258–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.048
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.048
pubmed: 21241907
Hiraoka T, Miyata K, Hayashidera T, Iida M, Takada K, Minami K, Oshika T (2017) Influence of intraocular lens subsurface nanoglistenings on functional visual acuity. PLoS ONE 12:e0173574. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173574 . (Erratum in: PLoS One. 2017 Apr 17;12 (4):e0176318)
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173574
pubmed: 28328997
pmcid: 5362055
Ota Y, Minami K, Oki S, Bissen-Miyajima H, Okamoto K, Nakashima M, Tsubota K (2021) Subjective and objective refractions in eyes with extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses using echelette optics: clinical and experimental study. Acta Ophthalmol 99:e837–e843. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14660
doi: 10.1111/aos.14660
pubmed: 33191658
Hayashi K, Yoshida M, Hayashi H (2009) All-distance visual acuity and contrast visual acuity in eyes with a refractive multifocal intraocular lens with minimal added power. Ophthalmology 116:401–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.052
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.052
pubmed: 19152978
Ohtani S, Gekka S, Honbou M, Kataoka Y, Minami K, Miyata K, Oshika T (2009) One-year prospective intrapatient comparison of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses in patients with bilateral cataract. Am J Ophthalmol 147(984–989):989.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.037
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.037
pubmed: 19285656
Applegate RA, Howland HC, Sharp RP, Cottingham AJ, Yee RW (1998) Corneal aberrations and visual performance after radial keratotomy. J Refract Surg 14:397–407. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081-597X-19980701-05
doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-19980701-05
pubmed: 9699163
Kaido M (2018) Functional visual acuity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 59:DES29–DES35. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-23721
doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-23721
pubmed: 30481803
Hayashi H, Hayashi K, Nakao F, Hayashi F (1998) Quantitative comparison of posterior capsule opacification after polymethylmethacrylate, silicone, and soft acrylic intraocular lens implantation. Arch Ophthalmol 116:1579–1582. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.116.12.1579
doi: 10.1001/archopht.116.12.1579
pubmed: 9869784
Kaido M, Toda I, Ishida R, Konagai M, Dogru M, Tsubota K (2011) Age-related changes in functional visual acuity in healthy individuals. Jpn J Ophthalmol 55:183–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-011-0026-2
doi: 10.1007/s10384-011-0026-2
pubmed: 21584727
Derefeldt G, Lennerstrand G, Lundh B (1979) Age variations in normal human contrast sensitivity. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 57:679–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.1979.tb00517.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1979.tb00517.x
pubmed: 525292
Yoshino M, Bissen-Miyajima H, Minami K (2013) Assessment of whether visual outcomes with diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses vary with patient age. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:1502–1506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.04.031
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.04.031
pubmed: 23910713
Sakisaka T, Minami K, Takada K, Mori Y, Miyata K (2021) Functional visual acuity after implantation of diffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses using an echelett optics. BMC Ophthalmol 21:418. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02189-7
doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02189-7
pubmed: 34863126
pmcid: 8645128
Gatinel D, Loicq J (2016) Clinically relevant optical properties of bifocal, trifocal, and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 32:273–280. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20160121-07
doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160121-07
pubmed: 27070236
Minami K, Honbo M, Mori Y, Kataoka Y, Miyata K (2015) Area densitometry using rotating Scheimpflug photography for posterior capsule opacification and surface light scattering analyses. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:2444–2449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.05.038
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.05.038
pubmed: 26703495
Hiraoka T, Yamamoto T, Okamoto F, Oshika T (2013) Changes in functional visual acuity and ocular wavefront aberration after administration of eye ointment. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 29:770–775. https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2013.0024
doi: 10.1089/jop.2013.0024
pubmed: 23808568