Improvised herding: Mapping biobehavioral mechanisms that underlie group efficacy during improvised social interaction.
coordinated behavior
electrodermal activity
emotional contagion
group efficacy
herding
interpersonal synchrony
musical improvisation
physiological synchrony
Journal
Psychophysiology
ISSN: 1540-5958
Titre abrégé: Psychophysiology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0142657
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2023
09 2023
Historique:
revised:
14
09
2022
received:
01
03
2022
accepted:
08
11
2022
medline:
8
8
2023
pubmed:
19
4
2023
entrez:
19
04
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Improvisation is a natural occurring phenomenon that is central to social interaction. Yet, improvisation is an understudied area in group processes and intergroup relations. Here we build on theory and research about human herding to study the contributions of improvisation on group efficacy and its biobehavioral underpinnings. We employed a novel multimodal approach and integrative method when observing face-to-face interactions-51 triads (total N = 153) drummed together in spontaneous-free improvisations as a group, while their electrodermal activity was monitored simultaneously with their second-by-second rhythmic coordination on a shared electronic drum machine. Our results show that three hypothesized factors of human herding-physiological synchrony, behavioral coordination, and emotional contagion-predict a sense of group efficacy in its group members. These findings are some of the first to show herding at three levels (physiological, behavioral, and mental) in a single study and lay a basis for understanding the role of improvisation in social interaction.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e14307Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Psychophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Psychophysiological Research.
Références
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
Baron-Cohen, S. (2004). Essential difference: Male and female brains and the truth about autism. The Truth about the Male and Female Brain.
Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644-675. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094912
Baskerville, T. A., Allard, J., Wayman, C., & Douglas, A. J. (2009). Dopamine-oxytocin interactions in penile erection. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 2151-2164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06999.x
Baskerville, T. A., & Douglas, A. J. (2010). Dopamine and oxytocin interactions underlying behaviors: Potential contributions to behavioral disorders. CNS Neuroscience and Therapeutics, 16, e92-e123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00154.x
Beaty, R. E. (2015). The neuroscience of musical improvisation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 51, 108-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.004
Bensimon, M., Amir, D., & Wolf, Y. (2008). Drumming through trauma: Music therapy with post-traumatic soldiers. Arts in Psychotherapy, 35, 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2007.09.002
Bliese, P. (1998). Group size, ICC values, and group-level correlations: A simulation. Organizational Research Methods, 1(4), 355-373.
Bliese, P. (2013). Multilevel modeling in R (2.5). An introduction to R notes on R: A programming environment for data analysis and graphics.
Blood, A. J., & Zatorre, R. J. (2001). Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 11818-11823. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.191355898
Buijs, R. M., Geffard, M., Pool, C. W., & Hoorneman, E. M. D. (1984). The dopaminergic innervation of the supraoptic and paraventricular nucleus. A light and electron microscopical study. Brain Research, 323(1), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(84)90265-8
Butler, E. A. (2011). Temporal interpersonal emotion systems: The “TIES” that form relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 367-393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311411164
Cahart, M.-S., Amad, A., Draper, S. B., Lowry, R. G., Marino, L., Carey, C., Ginestet, C. E., Smith, M. S., & Williams, S. C. R. (2022). The effect of learning to drum on behavior and brain function in autistic adolescents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(23), e2106244119.
Chanel, G., Kivikangas, J. M., & Ravaja, N. (2012). Physiological compliance for social gaming analysis: Cooperative versus competitive play. Interacting with Computers, 24(4), 306-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2012.04.012
Chang, A., & Bordia, P. (2001). A multidimensional approach to the group cohesion-group performance relationship. Small Group Research, 32, 379-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640103200401
Danyluck, C., & Page-Gould, E. (2018). Intergroup dissimilarity predicts physiological synchrony and affiliation in intergroup interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 111-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.08.001
Danyluck, C., & Page-Gould, E. (2019). Social and physiological context can affect the meaning of physiological synchrony. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 8222. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44667-5
Dikker, S., Wan, L., Davidesco, I., Kaggen, L., Oostrik, M., McClintock, J., Rowland, J., Michalareas, G., van Bavel, J. J., Ding, M., & Poeppel, D. (2017). Brain-to-brain synchrony tracks real-world dynamic group interactions in the classroom. Current Biology, 27, 1375-1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.002
Doherty, R. W. (1997). The emotional contangion scale: A measure of individual differences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21(2), 131-154. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024956003661
Donnay, G. F., Rankin, S. K., Lopez-Gonzalez, M., Jiradejvong, P., & Limb, C. J. (2014). Neural substrates of interactive musical improvisation: An fMRI study of “trading fours” in jazz. PLoS One, 9, e88665. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088665
Faber, S. E. M., & McIntosh, A. R. (2020). Towards a standard model of musical improvisation. European Journal of Neuroscience, 51(3), 840-849. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14567
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Feldman, R. (2015). The adaptive human parental brain: Implications for children's social development. Trends in Neurosciences, 38, 387-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2015.04.004
Fukuie, T., Suwabe, K., Kawase, S., Shimizu, T., Ochi, G., Kuwamizu, R., Sakairi, Y., & Soya, H. (2022). Groove rhythm stimulates prefrontal cortex function in groove enjoyers. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11324-3
Golland, Y., Arzouan, Y., & Levit-Binnun, N. (2015). The mere co-presence: Synchronization of autonomic signals and emotional responses across co-present individuals not engaged in direct interaction. PLoS One, 10(5), e0125804.
Gordon, I., Gilboa, A., Cohen, S., Milstein, N., Haimovich, N., Pinhasi, S., & Siegman, S. (2020). Physiological and behavioral synchrony predict group cohesion and performance. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 8484. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65670-1
Gordon, I., Jack, A., Pretzsch, C. M., vander Wyk, B., Leckman, J. F., Feldman, R., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2016). Intranasal oxytocin enhances connectivity in the neural circuitry supporting social motivation and social perception in children with autism. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35054
Gordon, I., Martin, C., Feldman, R., & Leckman, J. F. (2011). Oxytocin and social motivation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 471-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2011.07.007
Greenberg, D. M., Decety, J., & Gordon, I. (2021). The social neuroscience of music: Understanding the social brain through human song. American Psychologist, 76(7), 1172-1185.
Henning, R. A., Boucsein, W., & Claudia Gil, M. (2001). Social-physiological compliance as a determinant of team performance. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 40(3), 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00190-2
Hodges, L., & Carron, A. V. (1992). Collective efficacy and group performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 23, 48-59.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85-98.
Janata, P. (2009). The neural architecture of music-evoked autobiographical memories. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2579-2594. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp008
Jex, S. M., & Bliese, P. D. (1999). Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 349-361. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.349
Juslin, P. N., Liljeström, S., Västfjäll, D., Barradas, G., & Silva, A. (2008). An experience sampling study of emotional reactions to music: Listener, music, and situation. Emotion, 8, 668-683. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013505
Juslin, P. N., & Västfjäll, D. (2008). Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 559-575. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08005293
Kim, J., Wigram, T., & Gold, C. (2008). The effects of improvisational music therapy on joint attention behaviors in autistic children: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1758-1766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-008-0566-6
Kotz, S. A., Ravignani, A., & Fitch, W. T. (2018). The evolution of rhythm processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 896-910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.08.002
Kozub, S., & McDonnell, J. (2000). Exploring the relationship between cohesion and collective efficacy in Rugby teams. Journal of Sport Behavior, 23(2), 120-130.
Lamm, C., Batson, C. D., & Decety, J. (2007). The neural substrate of human empathy: Effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(1), 42-58. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.42
LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815-852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642
Lee, E., Rhim, I., Lee, J. W., Ghim, J. W., Lee, S., Kim, E., & Jung, M. W. (2016). Enhanced neuronal activity in the medial prefrontal cortex during social approach behavior. Journal of Neuroscience, 36, 6926-6936. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0307-16.2016
Lent, R. W., Schmidt, J., & Schmidt, L. (2006). Collective efficacy beliefs in student work teams: Relation to self-efficacy, cohesion, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.04.001
Leo, F. M., González-Ponce, I., Sánchez-Miguel, P. A., Ivarsson, A., & García-Calvo, T. (2015). Role ambiguity, role conflict, team conflict, cohesion and collective efficacy in sport teams: A multilevel analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 20, 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.04.009
Levenson, R. W., & Gottman, J. M. (1983). Marital interaction: Physiological linkage and affective exchange. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 587-597. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.587
Limb, C. J., & Braun, A. R. (2008). Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: An fMRI study of jazz improvisation. PLoS One, 3, e1679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001679
Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Robitzsch, A., & Trautwein, U. (2011). A 2 × 2 taxonomy of multilevel latent contextual models: Accuracy-bias trade-offs in full and partial error correction models. Psychological Methods, 16(4), 444-467. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0024376
Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S., Holappa, J., Haataja, E., Huang, X., & Siipo, A. (2019). Going beyond what is visible: What multichannel data can reveal about interaction in the context of collaborative learning? Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 235-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.030
Mayo, O., & Gordon, I. (2020). In and out of synchrony-Behavioral and physiological dynamics of dyadic interpersonal coordination. Psychophysiology, 57, e13574. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13574
Mayo, O., Lavidor, M., & Gordon, I. (2021). Interpersonal autonomic nervous system synchrony and its association to relationship and performance-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiology and Behavior, 235, 113391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113391
Mønster, D., Håkonsson, D. D., Eskildsen, J. K., & Wallot, S. (2016). Physiological evidence of interpersonal dynamics in a cooperative production task. Physiology and Behavior, 156, 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.01.004
Montague, E., Xu, J., & Chiou, E. (2014). Shared experiences of technology and trust: An experimental study of physiological compliance between active and passive users in technology-mediated collaborative encounters. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 44(5), 614-624. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2014.2325859
Moreland, R. L. (2010). Are dyads really groups? Small Group Research, 41(2), 251-267.
Moriguchi, Y., Decety, J., Ohnishi, T., Maeda, M., Mori, T., Nemoto, K., Matsuda, H., & Komaki, G. (2007). Empathy and judging other's pain: An fMRI study of alexithymia. Cerebral Cortex, 17(9), 2223-2234. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhl130
Müller, V., Sänger, J., & Lindenberger, U. (2013). Intra- and inter-brain synchronization during musical improvisation on the guitar. PLoS One, 8, e73852. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073852
Noy, L., Levit-Binun, N., & Golland, Y. (2015). Being in the zone: Physiological markers of togetherness in joint improvisation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 187. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00187
Palumbo, R. V., Marraccini, M. E., Weyandt, L. L., Wilder-Smith, O., McGee, H. A., Liu, S., & Goodwin, M. S. (2017). Interpersonal autonomic physiology: A systematic review of the literature. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21, 99-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316628405
Paskevich, D. M., Dorsch, K. D., Brawley, L. R., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1999). Relationship between collective efficacy and team cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Group Dynamics, 3, 210-222. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.3.3.210
Prussia, G. E., & Kinicki, A. J. (1996). A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.187
Raafat, R. M., Chater, N., & Frith, C. (2009). Herding in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 420-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.002
R-Core-Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Salimpoor, V. N., Zald, D. H., Zatorre, R. J., Dagher, A., & McIntosh, A. R. (2015). Predictions and the brain: How musical sounds become rewarding. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 86-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.001
Schneider, B., Dich, Y., & Radu, I. (2020). Unpacking the relationship between existing and new measures of physiological synchrony and collaborative learning: A mixed methods study. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(1), 89-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09318-2
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Saporta, N., Marton-Alper, I. Z., & Gvirts, H. Z. (2019). Herding brains: A core neural mechanism for social alignment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 174-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.01.002
Shiller, R. J. (2002). Bubbles, human judgment, and expert opinion. Financial Analysts Journal, 58(3), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v58.n3.2535
Sornette, D., Woodard, R., & Zhou, W. X. (2009). The 2006-2008 oil bubble: Evidence of speculation, and prediction. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 388(8), 1571-1576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2009.01.011
Spink, K. S. (2016). Group cohesion and collective efficacy of volleyball teams. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12(3), 301-311. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.12.3.301
Spratling, M. W. (2017). A review of predictive coding algorithms. Brain and Cognition, 112, 92-97.
Tachibana, A., Noah, J. A., Ono, Y., Taguchi, D., & Ueda, S. (2019). Prefrontal activation related to spontaneous creativity with rock music improvisation: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 16044. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52348-6
Taiwo, Z., Bezdek, M., Mirabito, G., & Light, S. N. (2021). Empathy for joy recruits a broader prefrontal network than empathy for sadness and is predicted by executive functioning. Neuropsychology, 35(1), 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000666
Watson, C. B., Chemers, M. M., & Preiser, N. (2001). Collective efficacy: A multilevel analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(8), 1057-1068.
Whipple, J. (2004). Music in intervention for children and adolescents with autism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Music Therapy, 41, 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/41.2.90
Yoo, G. E., & Kim, S. J. (2018). Dyadic drum playing and social skills: Implications for rhythm-mediated intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Music Therapy, 55, 340-375. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/thy013
Zumeta, L. N., Oriol, X., Telletxea, S., Amutio, A., & Basabe, N. (2016). Collective efficacy in sports and physical activities: Perceived emotional synchrony and shared flow. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1960. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01960