Web-Based, Interactive, Interest-Based Negotiation Training for Managing Conflict in Isolated Environments: Opportunistic Study With an e-Survey.

Australia COVID-19 bargaining confined environments conflict management development environment essential management pandemic skill training users

Journal

JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Jun 2023
Historique:
received: 04 09 2022
accepted: 19 04 2023
revised: 27 02 2023
medline: 19 4 2023
pubmed: 19 4 2023
entrez: 19 04 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Effective negotiation in relationships is critical for successful long-duration space missions; inadequate conflict resolution has shown serious consequences. Less desirable forms of negotiation, including positional bargaining (eg, negotiating prices), can exacerbate conflicts. Traditional positional bargaining may work for simple, low-stakes transactions but does not prioritize ongoing relationships. High-stakes situations warrant interest-based negotiation, where parties with competing interests or goals collaborate in a mutually beneficial agreement. This is learnable but must be practiced. Refresher training during conflicts is important to prevent out-of-practice crew members from using less effective negotiation techniques. Training should be self-directed and not involve others because, on a space mission, the only other people available may be part of the conflict. We aimed to develop and test an interactive module teaching principles and skills of interest-based negotiation in a way that users find acceptable, valuable for learning, and enjoyable. Using a web-based, interactive-media approach, we scripted, filmed, and programmed an interest-based negotiation interactive training module. In the module, the program mentor introduces users to "The Circle of Value" approach to negotiation and highlights its key concepts through interactive scenarios requiring users to make selections at specific decision points. Each selection prompts feedback designed to reinforce a teaching point or highlight a particular negotiation technique. To evaluate the module, we sought populations experiencing isolation and confinement (an opportunistic design). This included 9 participants in isolated, confined environments in the Australian Antarctic Program and the Hawai'i Space Exploration Analog and Simulation Mars simulation, as well as a subset of people who self-identified as being isolated and confined during the COVID-19 pandemic. Feedback was collected from participants (n=54) through free-response answers and questionnaires with numerical scaling (0=strongly disagree to 4=strongly agree) at the end of the module. In total, 51 of 54 (94%) participants found the activity valuable for learning about conflict management (identified by those who selected either "somewhat agree" or "strongly agree"), including 100% of participants in the isolated and confined environment subset (mode=3). In total, 79% (128/162) of participant responses indicated that the module was realistic (mode=3), including 85% (23/27) of responses from participants in isolated and confined environments (mode=3). Most participants felt that this would be particularly valuable for new team members in an isolated, confined environment (46/54, 85% of all participants, mode 4; 7/9, 78% of the isolated and confined environment subset, mode 3) as well as veterans. This module offers a self-directed, consistent approach to interest-based negotiation training, which is well received by users. Although the data are limited due to the opportunistic study design, the module could be useful for individuals in isolated and confined environments and for anyone involved in high-stakes negotiations where sustaining relationships is essential.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Effective negotiation in relationships is critical for successful long-duration space missions; inadequate conflict resolution has shown serious consequences. Less desirable forms of negotiation, including positional bargaining (eg, negotiating prices), can exacerbate conflicts. Traditional positional bargaining may work for simple, low-stakes transactions but does not prioritize ongoing relationships. High-stakes situations warrant interest-based negotiation, where parties with competing interests or goals collaborate in a mutually beneficial agreement. This is learnable but must be practiced. Refresher training during conflicts is important to prevent out-of-practice crew members from using less effective negotiation techniques. Training should be self-directed and not involve others because, on a space mission, the only other people available may be part of the conflict.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
We aimed to develop and test an interactive module teaching principles and skills of interest-based negotiation in a way that users find acceptable, valuable for learning, and enjoyable.
METHODS METHODS
Using a web-based, interactive-media approach, we scripted, filmed, and programmed an interest-based negotiation interactive training module. In the module, the program mentor introduces users to "The Circle of Value" approach to negotiation and highlights its key concepts through interactive scenarios requiring users to make selections at specific decision points. Each selection prompts feedback designed to reinforce a teaching point or highlight a particular negotiation technique. To evaluate the module, we sought populations experiencing isolation and confinement (an opportunistic design). This included 9 participants in isolated, confined environments in the Australian Antarctic Program and the Hawai'i Space Exploration Analog and Simulation Mars simulation, as well as a subset of people who self-identified as being isolated and confined during the COVID-19 pandemic. Feedback was collected from participants (n=54) through free-response answers and questionnaires with numerical scaling (0=strongly disagree to 4=strongly agree) at the end of the module.
RESULTS RESULTS
In total, 51 of 54 (94%) participants found the activity valuable for learning about conflict management (identified by those who selected either "somewhat agree" or "strongly agree"), including 100% of participants in the isolated and confined environment subset (mode=3). In total, 79% (128/162) of participant responses indicated that the module was realistic (mode=3), including 85% (23/27) of responses from participants in isolated and confined environments (mode=3). Most participants felt that this would be particularly valuable for new team members in an isolated, confined environment (46/54, 85% of all participants, mode 4; 7/9, 78% of the isolated and confined environment subset, mode 3) as well as veterans.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This module offers a self-directed, consistent approach to interest-based negotiation training, which is well received by users. Although the data are limited due to the opportunistic study design, the module could be useful for individuals in isolated and confined environments and for anyone involved in high-stakes negotiations where sustaining relationships is essential.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37075233
pii: v7i1e42214
doi: 10.2196/42214
pmc: PMC10337338
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e42214

Informations de copyright

©Jennifer Fleischer, Jeff Ayton, Maree Riley, Kim Binsted, Devin R Cowan, Abigail M Fellows, Jeff A Weiss, Jay C Buckey. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 09.06.2023.

Références

Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005 Jun;76(6 Suppl):B74-7
pubmed: 15943198
JMIR Res Protoc. 2012 Sep 25;1(2):e11
pubmed: 23611902
JMIR Form Res. 2021 May 31;5(5):e26989
pubmed: 33973856
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005 Jun;76(6 Suppl):B126-34
pubmed: 15943205
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Feb 14;7:e37784
pubmed: 36787162
Am Psychol. 2003 May;58(5):353-63
pubmed: 12971084
Harv Bus Rev. 2010 Nov;88(11):66-75, 149
pubmed: 21049681
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005 Jun;76(6 Suppl):B61-6
pubmed: 15943196

Auteurs

Jennifer Fleischer (J)

Space Medicine Innovations Laboratory, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.

Jeff Ayton (J)

Australian Antarctic Division, Kingston, Australia.

Maree Riley (M)

Australian Antarctic Division, Kingston, Australia.

Kim Binsted (K)

University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, United States.

Devin R Cowan (DR)

Space Medicine Innovations Laboratory, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.

Abigail M Fellows (AM)

Space Medicine Innovations Laboratory, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.

Jeff A Weiss (JA)

Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, United States.

Jay C Buckey (JC)

Space Medicine Innovations Laboratory, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.

Classifications MeSH