A comparative overview of health and social care policy for older people in England and Scotland, United Kingdom (UK).

England Health and social care Older people Policy Scotland United Kingdom

Journal

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
ISSN: 1872-6054
Titre abrégé: Health Policy
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8409431

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Historique:
received: 28 06 2022
revised: 23 03 2023
accepted: 03 04 2023
medline: 12 5 2023
pubmed: 20 4 2023
entrez: 19 04 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Responsibility for health and social care was devolved to Scotland in 1999 with evidence of diverging policy and organisation of care compared to England. This paper provides a comparative overview of major health and social care policies in England and Scotland published between 2011 and 2023 relating to the care of older people. We searched United Kingdom (UK) and Scotland government websites for macro-level policy documents between 2011 and 2023 relating to the health and social care of older people (aged 65+). Data were extracted and emergent themes were summarised according to Donabedian's structure-process-outcome model. We reviewed 27 policies in England and 28 in Scotland. Four main policy themes emerged that were common to both countries. Two related to the structure of care: integration of care and adult social care reform. Two related to service delivery/processes of care: prevention and supported self-management and improving mental health care. Cross-cutting themes included person-centred care, addressing health inequalities, promoting use of technology, and improving outcomes. Despite differences in the structure of care, including more competition, financial incentivization, and consumer-based care in England compared to Scotland, there are similarities in policy vision around delivery/processes of care (e.g. person-centred care) and performance and patient outcomes. Lack of UK-wide health and social care datasets hinders evaluation of policies and comparison of outcomes between both countries.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Responsibility for health and social care was devolved to Scotland in 1999 with evidence of diverging policy and organisation of care compared to England. This paper provides a comparative overview of major health and social care policies in England and Scotland published between 2011 and 2023 relating to the care of older people.
METHODS METHODS
We searched United Kingdom (UK) and Scotland government websites for macro-level policy documents between 2011 and 2023 relating to the health and social care of older people (aged 65+). Data were extracted and emergent themes were summarised according to Donabedian's structure-process-outcome model.
RESULTS RESULTS
We reviewed 27 policies in England and 28 in Scotland. Four main policy themes emerged that were common to both countries. Two related to the structure of care: integration of care and adult social care reform. Two related to service delivery/processes of care: prevention and supported self-management and improving mental health care. Cross-cutting themes included person-centred care, addressing health inequalities, promoting use of technology, and improving outcomes.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Despite differences in the structure of care, including more competition, financial incentivization, and consumer-based care in England compared to Scotland, there are similarities in policy vision around delivery/processes of care (e.g. person-centred care) and performance and patient outcomes. Lack of UK-wide health and social care datasets hinders evaluation of policies and comparison of outcomes between both countries.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37075590
pii: S0168-8510(23)00099-4
doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104814
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

104814

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Auteurs

Navneet Aujla (N)

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, United Kingdom; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North-East and North-Cumbria, Newcastle University, United Kingdom.

Helen Frost (H)

Advanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, United Kingdom.

Bruce Guthrie (B)

Advanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, United Kingdom.

Barbara Hanratty (B)

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, United Kingdom; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North-East and North-Cumbria, Newcastle University, United Kingdom.

Eileen Kaner (E)

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, United Kingdom; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North-East and North-Cumbria, Newcastle University, United Kingdom.

Amy O'Donnell (A)

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, United Kingdom.

Margaret E Ogden (ME)

Public Contributor, United Kingdom.

Helen G Pain (HG)

Public Contributor, United Kingdom.

Susan D Shenkin (SD)

Advanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, United Kingdom.

Stewart W Mercer (SW)

Advanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, United Kingdom. Electronic address: stewart.mercer@ed.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH