Fossil pollen resolves origin of the South African Proteaceae as transcontinental not transoceanic.

Protea Proteacidites Triorites africaensis Australia Cape of South Africa Cretaceous Proteaceae kimberlite (Arnot) pipes paleobiogeography paleofire palynomorphs transoceanic dispersal

Journal

Annals of botany
ISSN: 1095-8290
Titre abrégé: Ann Bot
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372347

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Apr 2023
Historique:
received: 07 02 2023
medline: 20 4 2023
pubmed: 20 4 2023
entrez: 19 04 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The prevailing view from the areocladogenesis of molecular phylogenies is that the iconic South African Cape Proteaceae (subfamily Proteoideae) arrived from Australia across the Indian Ocean in the Upper Cretaceous (100‒65 million years ago, Ma). Since fossil pollen indicates that the family probably arose in North-West Africa during the early Cretaceous, an alternative view is that it migrated to the Cape from North-Central Africa. The plan therefore was to collate fossil pollen records throughout Africa to determine if they are consistent with an African (para-autochthonous) origin for the Cape Proteaceae, and to seek further support from other paleo-disciplines. Palynology (identity, date and location of records), molecular phylogeny and chronogram preparation, biogeography of plate tectonics, and paleo-atmospheric and ocean circulation models. Our collation of the rich assemblage of Proteaceae palynomorphs stretching back to 107 Ma (Triorites africaensis) in North-West Africa showed its progressive overland migration to the Cape by 75‒65 Ma. No key palynomorphs recorded in Australia-Antarctica have morphological affinities with African fossils but specific clade assignment of the preMiocene records is not currently possible. The Cape Proteaceae encompass three molecular-based clades (tribes) whose most-recent apparent ancestors are sisters to those in Australia. However, our chronogram shows that the major Adenanthos/Leucadendron-related clade, originating 54‒34 Ma, would have 'arrived' too late as species with Proteaceae affinities were already present ~20 My earlier. The Franklandia/Protea-related clade arose 118‒81 Ma so its distinctive pollen should have been the foundation for the scores of palynomorphs recorded at 100‒80 Ma but it was not. Also, the prevailing winds and ocean currents trended away from South Africa rather than towards, as the 'out-of-Australia' hypothesis requires. Based on the evidence assembled here, we list three points favouring an Australian origin and nine against; four points favouring an Antarctic origin and seven against; and nine points favouring a North-Central African origin and three against. We conclude that a gradual migration of the Proteaceae from North-Central Africa southeast→south→southwest to the Cape and surrounds occurred via adaptation and speciation during the period 90‒70 Ma. We caution that incorrect conclusions may be drawn from literal interpretations of molecular phylogenies that neglect the fossil record and do not recognize the possible confounding effects of selection under matched environments leading to parallel evolution and extinction of bona fide sister clades.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OBJECTIVE
The prevailing view from the areocladogenesis of molecular phylogenies is that the iconic South African Cape Proteaceae (subfamily Proteoideae) arrived from Australia across the Indian Ocean in the Upper Cretaceous (100‒65 million years ago, Ma). Since fossil pollen indicates that the family probably arose in North-West Africa during the early Cretaceous, an alternative view is that it migrated to the Cape from North-Central Africa. The plan therefore was to collate fossil pollen records throughout Africa to determine if they are consistent with an African (para-autochthonous) origin for the Cape Proteaceae, and to seek further support from other paleo-disciplines.
METHODS METHODS
Palynology (identity, date and location of records), molecular phylogeny and chronogram preparation, biogeography of plate tectonics, and paleo-atmospheric and ocean circulation models.
KEY RESULTS RESULTS
Our collation of the rich assemblage of Proteaceae palynomorphs stretching back to 107 Ma (Triorites africaensis) in North-West Africa showed its progressive overland migration to the Cape by 75‒65 Ma. No key palynomorphs recorded in Australia-Antarctica have morphological affinities with African fossils but specific clade assignment of the preMiocene records is not currently possible. The Cape Proteaceae encompass three molecular-based clades (tribes) whose most-recent apparent ancestors are sisters to those in Australia. However, our chronogram shows that the major Adenanthos/Leucadendron-related clade, originating 54‒34 Ma, would have 'arrived' too late as species with Proteaceae affinities were already present ~20 My earlier. The Franklandia/Protea-related clade arose 118‒81 Ma so its distinctive pollen should have been the foundation for the scores of palynomorphs recorded at 100‒80 Ma but it was not. Also, the prevailing winds and ocean currents trended away from South Africa rather than towards, as the 'out-of-Australia' hypothesis requires. Based on the evidence assembled here, we list three points favouring an Australian origin and nine against; four points favouring an Antarctic origin and seven against; and nine points favouring a North-Central African origin and three against.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that a gradual migration of the Proteaceae from North-Central Africa southeast→south→southwest to the Cape and surrounds occurred via adaptation and speciation during the period 90‒70 Ma. We caution that incorrect conclusions may be drawn from literal interpretations of molecular phylogenies that neglect the fossil record and do not recognize the possible confounding effects of selection under matched environments leading to parallel evolution and extinction of bona fide sister clades.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37076271
pii: 7131425
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcad055
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Byron B Lamont (BB)

Ecology Section, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth WA 6845, Australia.

Tianhua He (T)

College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.

Richard M Cowling (RM)

African Centre for Coastal Palaeoscience, Nelson Mandela University, Eastern Cape, South Africa.

Classifications MeSH