Advantages and limitations of noninvasive devices for cardiac output monitoring: a literature review.
Journal
Current opinion in critical care
ISSN: 1531-7072
Titre abrégé: Curr Opin Crit Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9504454
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2023
01 06 2023
Historique:
medline:
5
5
2023
pubmed:
20
4
2023
entrez:
20
04
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Individualized hemodynamic optimization often requires cardiac output monitoring, mostly for goal-directed therapy in the operating room and fluid responsiveness assessment in the intensive care unit. Different technologies for noninvasive cardiac output determination have become available over the recent years. It is therefore crucial for care providers to be made aware of the advantages and limitations of those different devices for an appropriate use at the bedside. Nowadays, different noninvasive technologies exist, each with their advantages and limitations, but none are considered interchangeable with bolus thermodilution. Different clinical studies however, emphasize that the trending ability of such devices allows to guide decisions from care providers, and that their use may be associated with improved prognosis, especially in the operating room. Recent studies have also reported their potential use for hemodynamic optimization in specific populations. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring may have a clinical impact on patient outcomes. Further studies are required to evaluate their clinical relevance, notably in the intensive care unit. Noninvasive monitoring opens up the possibility for hemodynamic optimization in specific or low-risk populations, the benefit of which remains to be assessed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37078642
doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001045
pii: 00075198-202306000-00018
doi:
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
259-267Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Jessen MK, Vallentin MF, Holmberg MJ, et al. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2022; 128:416–433.
Messina A, Robba C, Calabrò L, et al. Association between perioperative fluid administration and postoperative outcomes: a 20-year systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized goal-directed trials in major visceral/noncardiac surgery. Crit Care 2021; 25:43.
Pinsky MR, Cecconi M, Chew MS, et al. Effective hemodynamic monitoring. Crit Care 2022; 26:294.
Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40:1795–1815.
Saugel B, Reuter DA III. Are we ready for the age of noninvasive haemodynamic monitoring? Br J Anaesth 2014; 113:340–343.
Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Poloniecki J, et al. Bench-to-bedside review: the importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies – with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care 2009; 13:201.
Crossingham IR, Nethercott DR, Columb MO. Comparing cardiac output monitors and defining agreement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Intensive Care Soc 2016; 17:302–313.
Lorne E, Diouf M, de Wilde RBP, Fischer MO. Assessment of interchangeability rate between 2 methods of measurements: an example with a cardiac output comparison study. Medicine 2018; 97:e9905.
Saugel B, Cecconi M, Wagner JY, Reuter DA. Noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring in perioperative and intensive care medicine. Br J Anaesth 2015; 114:562–575.
Critchley LA, Yang XX, Lee A. Assessment of trending ability of cardiac output monitors by polar plot methodology. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011; 25:536–546.
Singer M. Oesophageal Doppler. Curr Opin Crit Care 2009; 15:244–248.
Pinto BB, Atlas G, Geerts BF, Bendjelid K. The use of the oesophageal Doppler in perioperative medicine: new opportunities in research and clinical practice. J Clin Monit Comput 2017; 31:895–902.
Lefrant JY, Bruelle P, Aya AGM, et al. Training is required to improve the reliability of esophageal Doppler to measure cardiac output in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 1998; 24:347–352.
Fellahi JL, Abraham P, Tiberghien N, et al. Noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring in thoracic cancer surgery: a comparative study between calibrated pulse contour analysis and chest bioreactance. Eur J Anaesthesiol Intensive Care 2022; 1:e006.
Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology 2010; 113:1220–1235.
Dark PM, Singer M. The validity of trans-esophageal Doppler ultrasonography as a measure of cardiac output in critically ill adults. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:2060–2066.
Chytra I, Pradl R, Bosman R, et al. Esophageal Doppler-guided fluid management decreases blood lactate levels in multiple-trauma patients: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2007; 11:R24.
Noblett SE, Snowden CP, Shenton BK, Horgan AF. Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection. Br J Surg 2006; 93:1069–1076.
Wakeling HG, McFall MR, Jenkins CS, et al. Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95:634–642.
Pillai P, McEleavy I, Gaughan M, et al. A double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial to assess the effect of Doppler optimized intraoperative fluid management on outcome following radical cystectomy. J Urol 2011; 186:2201–2206.
Gan TJ, Soppitt A, Maroof M, et al. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology 2002; 97:820–826.
McKendry M, McGloin H, Saberi D, et al. Randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of a nurse delivered, flow monitored protocol for optimisation of circulatory status after cardiac surgery. BMJ 2004; 329:258.
Srinivasa S, Lemanu DP, Singh PP, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of oesophageal Doppler-guided fluid management in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2013; 100:1701–1708.
Colquhoun DA, Roche AM. Oesophageal Doppler cardiac output monitoring: a longstanding tool with evolving indications and applications. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2014; 28:353–362.
Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Boulain T. Noninvasive BP monitoring in the critically ill. Chest 2018; 153:1023–1039.
Saugel B, Kouz K, Scheeren TWL, et al. Cardiac output estimation using pulse wave analysis—physiology, algorithms, and technologies: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth 2021; 126:67–76.
Saugel B, Cecconi M, Hajjar LA. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in cardiothoracic surgery patients: available methods and future directions. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019; 33:1742–1752.
Servaas S, van Eijk LT, Malagon I, Slagt C. Prolonged peri-operative use of radial artery applanation tonometry for cardiac output measurement during abdominal surgery: a potential pressure sore risk. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2022; 39:170–173.
Kim SH, Lilot M, Sidhu KS, et al. Accuracy and precision of continuous noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring compared with invasive arterial pressure. Anesthesiology 2014; 120:1080–1097.
Saugel B, Hoppe P, Nicklas JY, et al. Continuous noninvasive pulse wave analysis using finger cuff technologies for arterial blood pressure and cardiac output monitoring in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2020; 125:25–37.
Joosten A, Desebbe O, Suehiro K, et al. Accuracy and precision of noninvasive cardiac output monitoring devices in perioperative medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2017; 118:298–310.
Fischer MO, Joosten A, Desebbe O, et al. Interchangeability of cardiac output measurements between noninvasive photoplethysmography and bolus thermodilution: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2020; 39:75–85.
Wagner JY, Sarwari H, Schön G, et al. Radial artery applanation tonometry for continuous noninvasive cardiac output measurement: a comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in patients after cardiothoracic surgery. Crit Care Med 2015; 43:1423–1428.
Michard F, Giglio MT, Brienza N. Perioperative goal-directed therapy with uncalibrated pulse contour methods: impact on fluid management and postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth 2017; 119:22–30.
Fischer MO, Fiant AL, Debroczi S, et al. Perioperative noninvasive haemodynamic optimisation using photoplethysmography: a randomised controlled trial and meta-analysis. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2020; 39:421–428.
Lorente JV, Reguant F, Arnau A, et al. Effect of goal-directed haemodynamic therapy guided by noninvasive monitoring on perioperative complications in elderly hip fracture patients within an enhanced recovery pathway. Perioper Med 2022; 11:46.
Anand G, Yu Y, Lowe A, Kalra A. Bioimpedance analysis as a tool for hemodynamic monitoring: overview, methods and challenges. Physiol Meas 2021; 42:
Sramek BB. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care Med 1994; 22:1337–1339.
Squara P, Denjean D, Estagnasie P, et al. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM): a clinical validation. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:1191–1194.
Fellahi JL, Fischer MO. Electrical bioimpedance cardiography: an old technology with new hopes for the future. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2014; 28:755–760.
Kupersztych-Hagege E, Teboul JL, Artigas A, et al. Bioreactance is not reliable for estimating cardiac output and the effects of passive leg raising in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 2013; 111:961–966.
Galarza L, Mercado P, Teboul JL, et al. Estimating the rapid haemodynamic effects of passive leg raising in critically ill patients using bioreactance. Br J Anaesth 2018; 121:567–573.
Raaijmakers E, Faes TJ, Scholten RJ, et al. A meta-analysis of three decades of validating thoracic impedance cardiography. Crit Care Med 1999; 27:1203–1213.
Sanders M, Servaas S, Slagt C. Accuracy and precision of noninvasive cardiac output monitoring by electrical cardiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Monit Comput 2020; 34:433–460.
Lamia B, Kim HK, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR. Cross-comparisons of trending accuracies of continuous cardiac-output measurements: pulse contour analysis, bioreactance, and pulmonary-artery catheter. J Clin Monit Comput 2018; 32:33–43.
Fagnoul D, Vincent JL, Backer DD. Cardiac output measurements using the bioreactance technique in critically ill patients. Crit Care 2012; 16:460.
Huang L, Critchley LAH, Zhang J. Major upper abdominal surgery alters the calibration of bioreactance cardiac output readings, the NICOM, when comparisons are made against suprasternal and esophageal Doppler intraoperatively. Anesth Analg 2015; 121:936–945.
Gavelli F, Beurton A, Teboul JL, et al. Bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened. Ann Intensive Care 2021; 11:133.
Doherty A, El-Khuffash A, Monteith C, et al. Comparison of bioreactance and echocardiographic noninvasive cardiac output monitoring and myocardial function assessment in primagravida women. Br J Anaesth 2017; 118:527–532.
Sinha AC, Singh PM, Grewal N, et al. Comparison between continuous noninvasive estimated cardiac output by pulse wave transit time and thermodilution method. Ann Card Anaesth 2014; 17:273–277.
Suzuki T, Suzuki Y, Okuda J, et al. Cardiac output and stroke volume variation measured by the pulse wave transit time method: a comparison with an arterial pressure-based cardiac output system. J Clin Monit Comput 2019; 33:385–392.
Smetkin AA, Hussain A, Fot EV, et al. Estimated continuous cardiac output based on pulse wave transit time in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison with transpulmonary thermodilution. J Clin Monit Comput 2017; 31:361–370.
Biais M, Berthezène R, Petit L, et al. Ability of esCCO to track changes in cardiac output. Br J Anaesth 2015; 115:403–410.
Jaffe MB. Partial CO2 rebreathing cardiac output--operating principles of the NICO system. J Clin Monit Comput 1999; 15:387–401.
Nguyen LS, Squara P. Non-invasive monitoring of cardiac output in critical care medicine. Front Med 2017; 4:200.
Meng L, Phuong Tran N, Alexander BS, et al. The impact of phenylephrine, ephedrine, and increased preload on third-generation Vigileo-FloTrac and esophageal Doppler cardiac output measurements. Anesth Analg 2011; 113:751–757.
Monnet X, Anguel N, Jozwiak M, et al. Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo does not reliably track changes in cardiac output induced by norepinephrine in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108:615–622.
Suehiro K, Tanaka K, Mikawa M, et al. Improved performance of the fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo system for tracking cardiac output changes. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2015; 29:656–662.
Scolletta S, Franchi F, Romagnoli S, et al. Comparison between Doppler-echocardiography and uncalibrated pulse contour method for cardiac output measurement: a multicenter observational study. Crit Care Med 2016; 44:1370–1379.
Nicklas JY, Diener O, Leistenschneider M, et al. Personalised haemodynamic management targeting baseline cardiac index in high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a randomised single-centre clinical trial. Br J Anaesth 2020; 125:122–132.
Frassanito L, Sonnino C, Piersanti A, et al. Performance of the hypotension prediction index with noninvasive arterial pressure waveforms in awake cesarean delivery patients under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2022; 134:633–643.
Freidl T, Baik N, Pichler G, et al. Haemodynamic transition after birth: a new tool for non-invasive cardiac output monitoring. Neonatology 2017; 111:55–60.
Ling HZ, Gallardo-Arozena M, Company-Calabuig AM, et al. Clinical validation of bioreactance for the measurement of cardiac output in pregnancy. Anaesthesia 2020; 75:1307–1313.
Belin O, Casteres C, Alouini S, et al. Manually controlled, continuous infusion of phenylephrine or norepinephrine for maintenance of blood pressure and cardiac output during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a double-blinded randomized study. Anesth Analg 2022; 136:540–550.
Michard F, Kalkman CJ. Rethinking patient surveillance on hospital wards. Anesthesiology 2021; 135:531–540.
King CE, Kermode A, Saxena G, et al. Postoperative continuous noninvasive cardiac output monitoring on the ward: a feasibility study. J Clin Monit Comput 2021; 35:1349–1356.
Fortin J, Rogge DE, Fellner C, et al. A novel art of continuous noninvasive blood pressure measurement. Nat Commun 2021; 12:1387.
Kuper M, Gold SJ, Callow C, et al. Intraoperative fluid management guided by oesophageal Doppler monitoring. BMJ 2011; 342:d3016–d3016.