Suicide Prevention Using Google Ads: Randomized Controlled Trial Measuring Engagement.

Google Ads advertise advertising campaign digital advertising digital intervention mental health online intervention prevention search self harm suicidal suicide suicide hotline suicide prevention

Journal

JMIR mental health
ISSN: 2368-7959
Titre abrégé: JMIR Ment Health
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101658926

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Apr 2023
Historique:
received: 31 08 2022
accepted: 19 12 2022
revised: 19 12 2022
medline: 20 4 2023
pubmed: 20 4 2023
entrez: 20 04 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Studies have shown that individuals may search for suicide-related terms on the internet prior to an attempt. Thus, across 2 studies, we investigated engagement with an advertisement campaign designed to reach individuals contemplating suicide. First, we designed the campaign to focus on crisis, running a campaign for 16 days in which crisis-related keywords would trigger an ad and landing page to help individuals find the national suicide hotline number. Second, we expanded the campaign to also help individuals contemplating suicide, running the campaign for 19 days with a wider range of keywords through a co-designed website with a wider range of offerings (eg, lived experience stories). In the first study, the ad was shown 16,505 times and was clicked 664 times (4.02% click rate). There were 101 calls to the hotline. In the second study, the ad was shown 120,881 times and clicked 6227 times (5.15% click rate); of these 6227 clicks, there were 1419 (22.79%) engagements with the site, a substantially higher rate than the industry average of 3%. The number of clicks on the ad was high despite a suicide hotline banner likely being present. Search advertisements are a quick, far-reaching, and cost-efficient way of reaching those contemplating suicide and are needed despite suicide hotline banners being present. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12623000084684; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=385209.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Studies have shown that individuals may search for suicide-related terms on the internet prior to an attempt.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
Thus, across 2 studies, we investigated engagement with an advertisement campaign designed to reach individuals contemplating suicide.
METHODS METHODS
First, we designed the campaign to focus on crisis, running a campaign for 16 days in which crisis-related keywords would trigger an ad and landing page to help individuals find the national suicide hotline number. Second, we expanded the campaign to also help individuals contemplating suicide, running the campaign for 19 days with a wider range of keywords through a co-designed website with a wider range of offerings (eg, lived experience stories).
RESULTS RESULTS
In the first study, the ad was shown 16,505 times and was clicked 664 times (4.02% click rate). There were 101 calls to the hotline. In the second study, the ad was shown 120,881 times and clicked 6227 times (5.15% click rate); of these 6227 clicks, there were 1419 (22.79%) engagements with the site, a substantially higher rate than the industry average of 3%. The number of clicks on the ad was high despite a suicide hotline banner likely being present.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Search advertisements are a quick, far-reaching, and cost-efficient way of reaching those contemplating suicide and are needed despite suicide hotline banners being present.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12623000084684; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=385209.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37079348
pii: v10i1e42316
doi: 10.2196/42316
pmc: PMC10160926
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e42316

Informations de copyright

©Sandersan Onie, Patrick Berlinquette, Sarah Holland, Nicola Livingstone, Coco Finemore, Nyree Gale, Emma Elder, George Laggis, Cassandra Heffernan, Susanne Oliver Armstrong, Adam Theobald, Natasha Josifovski, Michelle Torok, Fiona Shand, Mark Larsen. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (https://mental.jmir.org), 20.04.2023.

Références

Early Interv Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;10(2):103-21
pubmed: 25702826
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011 Jun;65(4):392-4
pubmed: 21569178
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 6;23(5):e27918
pubmed: 33955838
J Affect Disord. 2011 Jul;132(1-2):179-84
pubmed: 21371755
J Affect Disord. 2020 Feb 1;262:155-164
pubmed: 31733460

Auteurs

Sandersan Onie (S)

Black Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.

Patrick Berlinquette (P)

BERLIN SEM, New York, NY, United States.

Sarah Holland (S)

Black Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.

Nicola Livingstone (N)

Black Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.

Coco Finemore (C)

Black Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.

Nyree Gale (N)

Black Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.

Emma Elder (E)

Black Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.

George Laggis (G)

Black Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.

Cassandra Heffernan (C)

Black Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.

Susanne Oliver Armstrong (SO)

Black Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.

Adam Theobald (A)

Black Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.

Natasha Josifovski (N)

Black Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.

Michelle Torok (M)

Black Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.

Fiona Shand (F)

Black Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.

Mark Larsen (M)

Black Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.

Classifications MeSH