Cervical cerclage technique: what do experts actually achieve?


Journal

American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM
ISSN: 2589-9333
Titre abrégé: Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101746609

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2023
Historique:
received: 15 02 2023
revised: 26 03 2023
accepted: 30 03 2023
medline: 3 7 2023
pubmed: 21 4 2023
entrez: 20 04 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Cervical cerclage is a recognized intervention in the management of women at risk of preterm birth and midtrimester loss. The mechanism of action of cerclage is unclear, and the technique has been poorly researched. This study aimed to evaluate cerclage technique among experienced obstetricians, using a previously developed and evaluated cerclage simulator. This prospective experimental simulation and observational study used identical simulators for 28 consultant obstetricians who were asked to perform their normal cerclage. Suture type, height, knot site, and free thread length were recorded. Using computed tomography, depth of bite and tension (by reduction in area of cervix) were calculated. A total of 52 cervical cerclages were completed (Mersilene tape, n=20; monofilament suture, n=32). Mean suture height was 33 mm (standard deviation, 7.7 mm), greater with monofilament suture than with Mersilene tape, and associated with smaller needle size. Mean depth of bite and mean reduction of starting area did not differ by suture type. Seven procedures showed ≥1 suture bite that had entered the cervical canal once or more. This study assessed cerclage technique of experienced obstetricians using simulators and computed tomography imaging, and demonstrated wide variation in technique; this may affect the efficacy of the procedure. Further work should establish optimal technique and consensus for training and clinical practice.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Cervical cerclage is a recognized intervention in the management of women at risk of preterm birth and midtrimester loss. The mechanism of action of cerclage is unclear, and the technique has been poorly researched.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to evaluate cerclage technique among experienced obstetricians, using a previously developed and evaluated cerclage simulator.
STUDY DESIGN
This prospective experimental simulation and observational study used identical simulators for 28 consultant obstetricians who were asked to perform their normal cerclage. Suture type, height, knot site, and free thread length were recorded. Using computed tomography, depth of bite and tension (by reduction in area of cervix) were calculated.
RESULTS
A total of 52 cervical cerclages were completed (Mersilene tape, n=20; monofilament suture, n=32). Mean suture height was 33 mm (standard deviation, 7.7 mm), greater with monofilament suture than with Mersilene tape, and associated with smaller needle size. Mean depth of bite and mean reduction of starting area did not differ by suture type. Seven procedures showed ≥1 suture bite that had entered the cervical canal once or more.
CONCLUSION
This study assessed cerclage technique of experienced obstetricians using simulators and computed tomography imaging, and demonstrated wide variation in technique; this may affect the efficacy of the procedure. Further work should establish optimal technique and consensus for training and clinical practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37080297
pii: S2589-9333(23)00103-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100961
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Observational Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

100961

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Laura I Stirrat (LI)

Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom (Dr Stirrat). Electronic address: Laura.Stirrat4@nhs.scot.

Florence Tydeman (F)

Department of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (Dr F Tydeman).

Natalie Suff (N)

Department of Women and Children's Health, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (Drs Suff, Hall, and Shennan).

Megan Hall (M)

Department of Women and Children's Health, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (Drs Suff, Hall, and Shennan).

Wendy J English (WJ)

Departments of Radiology (Ms English), Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, United Kingdom.

Andrew H Shennan (AH)

Department of Women and Children's Health, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (Drs Suff, Hall, and Shennan).

Graham Tydeman (G)

Departments of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Dr G Tydeman), Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH