Mixed-methods feasibility study to inform a randomised controlled trial of proton pump inhibitors to reduce strictures following neonatal surgery for oesophageal atresia.
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Constriction, Pathologic
/ etiology
Esophageal Atresia
/ complications
Feasibility Studies
Gastroesophageal Reflux
/ etiology
Proton Pump Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Esophageal Stenosis
/ etiology
Chemoprevention
Health Care Surveys
Parents
Physicians
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
/ methods
Omeprazole
/ administration & dosage
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Attitude of Health Personnel
Adult
neonatal intensive & critical care
neonatology
paediatric gastroenterology
qualitative research
statistics & research methods
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 04 2023
20 04 2023
Historique:
medline:
24
4
2023
pubmed:
21
4
2023
entrez:
20
04
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This mixed-methods feasibility study aimed to explore parents' and medical practitioners' views on the acceptability and design of a clinical trial to determine whether routine prophylactic proton pump inhibitors (PPI) reduce the incidence of anastomotic stricture in infants with oesophageal atresia (OA). Semi-structured interviews with UK parents of an infant with OA and an online survey, telephone interviews and focus groups with clinicians. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and descriptive statistics. We interviewed 18 parents of infants with OA. Fifty-one clinicians (49 surgeons, 2 neonatologists) from 20/25 (80%) units involved in OA repair completed an online survey and 10 took part in 1 of 2 focus groups. Interviews were conducted with two clinicians whose survey responses indicated they had concerns about the trial. Parents and clinicians ranked the same top four outcomes ('Severity of anastomotic stricture', 'Incidence of anastomotic stricture', 'Need for treatment of reflux' and 'Presence of symptoms of reflux') as important to measure for the proposed trial. All parents and most clinicians found the use, dose and duration of omeprazole as the intervention medication, and the placebo control, as acceptable. Parents stated they would hypothetically consent to their child's participation in the trial. Concerns of a few parents and clinicians about infants suffering with symptomatic reflux, and the impact of this for study retention, appeared to be alleviated through the symptomatic reflux treatment pathway. Hesitant clinician views appeared to change through discussion of parental support for the study and by highlighting existing research that questions current practice of PPI treatment. Our findings indicate that parents and most clinicians view the proposed Treating Oesophageal Atresia with prophylactic proton pump inhibitors to prevent STricture (TOAST) trial to be feasible and acceptable so long as infants can be given PPI if clinicians deem it clinically necessary. This insight into parent and clinician views and concerns will inform pilot phase trial monitoring, staff training and the development of the trial protocol.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37080617
pii: bmjopen-2022-066070
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066070
pmc: PMC10124212
doi:
Substances chimiques
Proton Pump Inhibitors
0
Omeprazole
KG60484QX9
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e066070Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme grant payments to support the conduct of this study were made to the institutions of all authors (except JP). TKM and EN employment roles were funded by the NIHR HTA programme grant payment made to their institutions.
Références
Pediatr Surg Int. 2018 May;34(5):491-497
pubmed: 29536176
J Surg Res. 2020 Oct;254:334-339
pubmed: 32521372
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 25;9(8):e106149
pubmed: 25153838
Arch Dis Child. 2018 Jan;103(1):28-32
pubmed: 28847877
BMJ. 2000 Jan 1;320(7226):50-2
pubmed: 10617534
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 May 30;17(1):375
pubmed: 28558748
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 10;11(3):e041952
pubmed: 33692177
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760
pubmed: 26613970
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Apr;22(2):139-42
pubmed: 22517521
Trials. 2022 Apr 8;23(1):268
pubmed: 35395930
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 18;5(9):e008522
pubmed: 26384724
Front Pediatr. 2017 May 29;5:120
pubmed: 28611969
Trials. 2014 Jan 23;15:32
pubmed: 24456928
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016 Nov;63(5):550-570
pubmed: 27579697
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 28;12(1):28
pubmed: 28245849
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Feb 16;7(1):49
pubmed: 33593416
Qual Health Res. 2000 May;10(3):378-95
pubmed: 10947483
Br J Health Psychol. 2018 Sep;23(3):519-531
pubmed: 29453791
BMJ Open. 2014 May 15;4(5):e005045
pubmed: 24833694