Brain metastases in the elderly - Impact of residual tumor volume on overall survival.
brain metastasis
elderly
extent of resection
overall survival
postoperative MRI
postoperative tumor volume
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
22
01
2023
accepted:
21
03
2023
medline:
21
4
2023
pubmed:
21
4
2023
entrez:
21
04
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Due to demographic changes and an increased incidence of cancer with age, the number of patients with brain metastases (BMs) constantly increases, especially among the elderly. Novel systemic therapies, such as immunotherapy, have led to improved survival in recent years, but intracranial tumor progression may occur independently of a systemically effective therapy. Despite the growing number of geriatric patients, they are often overlooked in clinical trials, and there is no consensus on the impact of BM resection on survival. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of resection and residual tumor volume on clinical outcome and overall survival (OS) in elderly patients suffering from BM. Patients ≥ 75 years who had surgery for BM between April 2007 and January 2020 were retrospectively included. Residual tumor burden (RTB) was determined by segmentation of early postoperative brain MRI (72 h). Contrast-enhancing tumor subvolumes were segmented manually. "Postoperative tumor volume" refers to the targeted BMs. Impact of preoperative Karnofsky performance status scale (KPSS), age, sex and RTB on OS was analyzed. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates for the univariate analysis and the Cox regression proportional hazards model for the multivariate analysis. One hundred and one patients were included. Median age at surgery was 78 years (IQR 76-81). Sixty-two patients (61%) had a single BM; 16 patients (16%) had two BMs; 13 patients (13%) had three BMs; and 10 patients (10%) had more than three BMs. Median preoperative tumor burden was 10.3 cm RTB is a strong predictor for prolonged OS, regardless of age or cancer type. Postoperative MRI should confirm the extent of resection, as intraoperative estimates do not warrant a complete resection. It is crucial to aim for maximal cytoreduction to achieve the best long-term outcomes for these patients, despite the fact the patients are advanced in age.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Due to demographic changes and an increased incidence of cancer with age, the number of patients with brain metastases (BMs) constantly increases, especially among the elderly. Novel systemic therapies, such as immunotherapy, have led to improved survival in recent years, but intracranial tumor progression may occur independently of a systemically effective therapy. Despite the growing number of geriatric patients, they are often overlooked in clinical trials, and there is no consensus on the impact of BM resection on survival.
Objectives
UNASSIGNED
The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of resection and residual tumor volume on clinical outcome and overall survival (OS) in elderly patients suffering from BM.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Patients ≥ 75 years who had surgery for BM between April 2007 and January 2020 were retrospectively included. Residual tumor burden (RTB) was determined by segmentation of early postoperative brain MRI (72 h). Contrast-enhancing tumor subvolumes were segmented manually. "Postoperative tumor volume" refers to the targeted BMs. Impact of preoperative Karnofsky performance status scale (KPSS), age, sex and RTB on OS was analyzed. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates for the univariate analysis and the Cox regression proportional hazards model for the multivariate analysis.
Results
UNASSIGNED
One hundred and one patients were included. Median age at surgery was 78 years (IQR 76-81). Sixty-two patients (61%) had a single BM; 16 patients (16%) had two BMs; 13 patients (13%) had three BMs; and 10 patients (10%) had more than three BMs. Median preoperative tumor burden was 10.3 cm
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
RTB is a strong predictor for prolonged OS, regardless of age or cancer type. Postoperative MRI should confirm the extent of resection, as intraoperative estimates do not warrant a complete resection. It is crucial to aim for maximal cytoreduction to achieve the best long-term outcomes for these patients, despite the fact the patients are advanced in age.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37081991
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1149628
pmc: PMC10110925
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1149628Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Baumgart, Aftahy, Anetsberger, Thunstedt, Wiestler, Bernhardt, Combs, Meyer, Meyer and Gempt.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
BM works as consultants for Brainlab Brainlab AG, Feldkirchen. In addition, BM works as a consultant for Medtronic, Spineart, Icotec, Relievant and Depuy/Synthes, as a member of their advisory boards. Furthermore, BM reports financial relationships with Medtronic, Ulrich Medical, Brainlab, Spineart, Icotec, Relievant and Depuy/Synthes. He received personal fees and research grants for clinical studies from Medtronic, Ulrich Medical, Brainlab, Icotec and Relievant. All of this happened independently of the submitted work. BM receives royalties from and holds a patent with Spineart. All of the named potential conflicts of interest are unrelated to this study. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Neurosurg. 2003 Sep;99(3):467-73
pubmed: 12959431
J Neurooncol. 2019 Jun;143(2):359-367
pubmed: 30989623
Acta Neurol Scand. 2009 Nov;120(5):288-94
pubmed: 19737154
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015 Dec;6(6):605-12
pubmed: 26697191
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Feb 1;19(2):162-174
pubmed: 28391295
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 May;168:153-162
pubmed: 29554624
Front Oncol. 2021 Jul 26;11:713965
pubmed: 34381733
Brain Sci. 2021 Jan 18;11(1):
pubmed: 33477588
J Neurosurg. 2014 Nov;121(5):1115-23
pubmed: 25192475
Sci Rep. 2019 May 15;9(1):7431
pubmed: 31092876
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Oct;49(4):E2
pubmed: 33002881
BMC Neurol. 2022 Jan 21;22(1):32
pubmed: 35062885
J Neurosurg. 2011 Mar;114(3):604-12
pubmed: 20524825
N Engl J Med. 1990 Feb 22;322(8):494-500
pubmed: 2405271
World Neurosurg. 2017 Sep;105:53-62
pubmed: 28465276
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Mar 1;43(4):795-803
pubmed: 10098435
Cancer. 2005 Mar 15;103(6):1234-44
pubmed: 15666327
N Engl J Med. 1999 Dec 30;341(27):2061-7
pubmed: 10615079
J Neurooncol. 2015 May;122(3):567-73
pubmed: 25700836
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;3(8):1023-1024
pubmed: 28056128
JAMA. 2006 Jun 7;295(21):2483-91
pubmed: 16757720
Neuro Oncol. 2013 Oct;15(10):1429-37
pubmed: 23956241
Front Oncol. 2022 May 04;12:869764
pubmed: 35600394
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jun;16(6):e270-8
pubmed: 26065612
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Aug;18(8):1049-1060
pubmed: 28687377
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Jul 1;29(4):711-7
pubmed: 8040016
Br J Neurosurg. 2016 Jun;30(3):330-6
pubmed: 26828095