Exploring the relationship between exposure to COVID-19 and donations during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating roles of emotions and risk perception.

COVID-19 pandemic donation emotion public emergency risk perception terror management theory

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 24 09 2022
accepted: 08 03 2023
medline: 21 4 2023
pubmed: 21 4 2023
entrez: 21 04 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Public emergency events like the COVID-19 pandemic are special occasions that need immediate massive funding from public donations. Thus, understanding the determinants of donation behaviors under public emergencies is important for both researchers and practitioners. This study investigated the effect of personal and local exposure to incidences of COVID-19 on donation behaviors. Specifically, we examined the mediating effects of risk perception and emotions on the relationship between exposure to COVID-19 and donation behaviors. The data were from a survey distributed in China between March 20 and 30th, 2020. Participants' donation choice at the end of the survey was used to measure their donation behaviors. Participants' emotions, risk perception, and personal exposure were assessed in the questionnaire. Local exposure was the 30-day confirmed cases obtained from the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China. A total of 8,720 participants (Mean age = 28.91, 43.6% females) completed the online survey. Based on the results from the mediation analysis, we found that people with stronger positive and negative emotions, higher risk perception, and more personal exposure to COVID-19 were more likely to donate. Furthermore, the effects of both personal and local exposure on donations are mediated by risk perception and negative emotion. Both higher personal and local exposure led to stronger negative emotions and higher risk perception, which in turn led to more donation behaviors. This study extends our knowledge of donation behaviors during public emergencies. Our results suggest that policymakers and charity organizations should elicit stronger emotions and risk perception by exposing the severity of the disaster in advertisements to promote donations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37082569
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1052531
pmc: PMC10110961
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1052531

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Bao, Zhang and Wang.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Exp Econ. 2022;25(3):824-844
pubmed: 35475266
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Oct;57(4):681-90
pubmed: 2795438
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 31;12(1):4886
pubmed: 35361800
Emotion. 2016 Aug;16(5):691-705
pubmed: 27018610
Br J Psychol. 2021 Nov;112(4):866-878
pubmed: 33615446
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Aug;24(8):587-589
pubmed: 32410822
Psychol Aging. 2021 Jun;36(4):415-420
pubmed: 32969692
Omega (Westport). 2022 Apr 20;:302228221092583
pubmed: 35440220
Soc Work Public Health. 2021 May 19;36(4):474-485
pubmed: 33866952
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 14;12:726685
pubmed: 34594279
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jan 18;76(2):e24-e29
pubmed: 32470120
Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1686-95
pubmed: 23842959
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 05;12:743054
pubmed: 34675849
Risk Anal. 2004 Apr;24(2):311-22
pubmed: 15078302
J Affect Disord. 2021 Apr 1;284:247-255
pubmed: 33602537
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Jan 22;279(1727):219-23
pubmed: 21653590
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 19;9(10):
pubmed: 33086558
J Consum Aff. 2022 Spring;56(1):414-448
pubmed: 34226753
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 29;12:585128
pubmed: 33995171
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 01;11:2248
pubmed: 32982895
J Risk Uncertain. 2020;61(2):177-194
pubmed: 33223612
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 May;34(5):666-78
pubmed: 18303130
J Appl Psychol. 2016 May;101(5):702-20
pubmed: 26867106
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 25;13(10):e0204665
pubmed: 30359369
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Sep 16;7(9):200742
pubmed: 33047037
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021 Sep 27;:1-14
pubmed: 34602913
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jun;112(6):860-876
pubmed: 28253000
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 23;11(1):18950
pubmed: 34556687
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Mar;171:110456
pubmed: 33071411
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 14;13:1040518
pubmed: 36591029
J Soc Clin Psychol. 2020 Dec;39(10):
pubmed: 34465940
Am J Community Psychol. 1995 Aug;23(4):447-77
pubmed: 8546107
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 17;13:810951
pubmed: 35369239
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Jan 12;9(1):210919
pubmed: 35070340
Psychol Sci. 2012 May 1;23(5):446-52
pubmed: 22457427
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Jun;45:101290
pubmed: 35151946
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 4;20(1):1649
pubmed: 33148201

Auteurs

Yun Bao (Y)

Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, United States.

Yan Zhang (Y)

The Affiliated Kangning Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Institute of Sociology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing, China.

Junxiu Wang (J)

The Affiliated Kangning Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Institute of Sociology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing, China.

Classifications MeSH