Comparing the directional effect of number calling on the developmental eye movement test results in Hebrew-speaking children.

children developmental eye movement test eye movements reading direction saccades

Journal

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)
ISSN: 1475-1313
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8208839

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2023
Historique:
revised: 08 04 2023
received: 03 01 2023
accepted: 10 04 2023
medline: 7 6 2023
pubmed: 21 4 2023
entrez: 21 04 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To evaluate the directional effect of number calling on the developmental eye movement (DEM) test in Hebrew-speaking children who read from right (R) to left (L). Previously, the DEM has been studied in nine languages, all read from L to R and has never been tested on Hebrew speakers. Healthy Hebrew-speaking children, aged 6-13 years were divided into two age groups (6-9, 10-13 years). Children had near visual acuity of 0.00 logMAR or better, no strabismus, stereoacuity ≤100 s of arc and near point of convergence ≤6 cm. The DEM test was performed twice, from R to L and L to R, randomly. Comparisons between age groups for horizontal and vertical reading speed and ratio between reading directions were analysed, as well as the correlation between age and directionality. A total of 92 children were included; 48 and 44 in the 6-9 and 10-13 year age groups, respectively. The mean vertical and horizontal time for both directions (R to L and L to R) in the younger group was significantly slower than the older group (p < 0.001). The older children showed no significant difference in the horizontal time reading from L to R and R to L. However, the younger children read more quickly in their native direction (R-L; 71.5 ± 25.9 s) compared with L-R (76.0 ± 31.4 s, p = 0.01). In both directions, the ratio was significantly higher in the younger age group. A negative correlation was demonstrated between age and reading ratio (p = 0.001). A clear directional preference of R to L was found in children under 10 years of age. We suggest administering the test from R to L in young Hebrew-speaking children. These results may also apply to young Arab- and Persian-speaking children who also read from R to L.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37083053
doi: 10.1111/opo.13150
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

623-628

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists.

Références

Richman JE, Garzia RP. Developmental eye movement test (DEM): Examiner's booklet. Mishawaka: Bernell Corporation; 1987.
Garzia RP, Richman JE, Nicholson SB, Gaines CS. A new visual-verbal saccade test: the development eye movement test (DEM). J Am Optom Assoc. 1990;61:124-35.
Tassinari JT, DeLand P. Developmental eye movement test: reliability and symptomatology. Optometry. 2005;76:387-99.
Ayton LN, Abel LA, Fricke TR, McBrien NA. Developmental eye movement test: what is it really measuring? Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86:722-30.
Facchin A, Maffioletti S, Carnevali T. The developmental eye movement (DEM) test: normative data for Italian population. Optom Vis Dev. 2012;43:162-79.
Orlansky G, Hopkins KB, Mitchell GL, Huang K, Frazier M, Heyman C, et al. Reliability of the developmental eye movement test. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88:1507-19.
Tanke N, Barsingerhorn AD, Boonstra FN, Goossens J. Visual fixations rather than saccades dominate the developmental eye movement test. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1162. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-020-80870-5
Facchin A, Maffioletti S. The reliability of the DEM test in the clinical environment. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1279. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2018.01279
Eviatr Z. Reading direction and attention: effects on lateralized ignoring. Brain Cogn. 1995;29:137-50.
Pollatsek A, Bolozky S, Well AD, Rayner K. Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers. Brain Lang. 1981;14:174-80.
Facchin A. Spotlight on the developmental eye movement (DEM) test. Clin Optom. 2021;13:73-81.
Moiroud L, Royo A, Bucci MP. The developmental eye movement test in French children. Optom Vis Sci. 2020;97:978-83.
Fernandez-Velazquez FJ, Fernandez-Fidalgo MJ. Do DEM test scores change with respect to the language? Norms for Spanish-speaking population. Optom Vis Sci. 1995;72:902-6.
Jiménez R, González MD, Pérez MA, Garcia JA. Evolution of accommodative function and development of ocular movements in children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2003;23:97-107.
Pang PC, Lam CS, Woo GC. The developmental eye movement (DEM) test and Cantonese-speaking children in Hong Kong SAR, China. Clin Exp Optom. 2010;93:213-23.
Okumura TWE. Visual skills in children with learning difficulties. Tokyo: Meijitosho Shuppan Corp; 2010.
Baptista AM, de Sousa RA, Casal CC, Marques RJ, da Silva CM. Norms for the developmental eye movement test for Portuguese children. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88:864-71.
Serdjukova J, Ekimane L, Valeinis J, Skilters J, Krumina G. How strong and weak readers perform on the developmental eye movement test (DEM): norms for Latvian school-aged children. Read Writ. 2017;30:233-52.
Xie Y, Shi C, Tong M, Zhang M, Li T, Xu Y, et al. Developmental eye movement (DEM) test norms for Mandarin Chinese-speaking Chinese children. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0148481. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0148481
Medland C, Walter H, Woodhouse JM. Eye movements and poor reading: does the developmental eye movement test measure cause or effect? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010;30:740-7.
Shaki S, Fischer MH, Göbel SM. Direction counts: a comparative study of spatially directional counting biases in cultures with different reading directions. J Exp Child Psychol. 2012;112:275-81.
Kazandjian S, Cavézian C, Zivotofsky AZ, Chokron S. Bisections in two languages: when number processing, spatial representation, and habitual reading direction interact. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48:4031-7.
Abed F. Cultural influences on visual scanning patterns. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1991;22:525-34.
Shaki S, Fischer MH. Reading space into numbers - a cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect. Cognition. 2008;108:590-9.

Auteurs

Rachel Eichler (R)

Department of Optometry and Vision Science, Hadassah Academic College, Jerusalem, Israel.

Mitchell Scheiman (M)

Pennsylvania College of Optometry, Salus University, Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, USA.

Hadas Ben-Eli (H)

Department of Optometry and Vision Science, Hadassah Academic College, Jerusalem, Israel.
Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH