Intranasal administration of adenoviral vaccines expressing SARS-CoV-2 spike protein improves vaccine immunity in mouse models.
Adenoviral vector
COVID-19
Intranasal vaccination
Mucosal immunity
SARS-CoV-2
Journal
Vaccine
ISSN: 1873-2518
Titre abrégé: Vaccine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8406899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 05 2023
11 05 2023
Historique:
received:
29
09
2022
revised:
28
03
2023
accepted:
05
04
2023
medline:
16
5
2023
pubmed:
22
4
2023
entrez:
21
04
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is controlled but not halted by public health measures and mass vaccination strategies which have exclusively relied on intramuscular vaccines. Intranasal vaccines can prime or recruit to the respiratory epithelium mucosal immune cells capable of preventing infection. Here we report a comprehensive series of studies on this concept using various mouse models, including HLA class II-humanized transgenic strains. We found that a single intranasal (i.n.) dose of serotype-5 adenoviral vectors expressing either the receptor binding domain (Ad5-RBD) or the complete ectodomain (Ad5-S) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was effective in inducing i) serum and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) anti-spike IgA and IgG, ii) robust SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing activity in the serum and BAL, iii) rigorous spike-directed T helper 1 cell/cytotoxic T cell immunity, and iv) protection of mice from a challenge with the SARS-CoV-2 beta variant. Intramuscular (i.m.) Ad5-RBD or Ad5-S administration did not induce serum or BAL IgA, and resulted in lower neutralizing titers in the serum. Moreover, prior immunity induced by an intramuscular mRNA vaccine could be potently enhanced and modulated towards a mucosal IgA response by an i.n. Ad5-S booster. Notably, Ad5 DNA was found in the liver or spleen after i.m. but not i.n. administration, indicating a lack of systemic spread of the vaccine vector, which has been associated with a risk of thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Unlike in otherwise genetically identical HLA-DQ6 mice, in HLA-DQ8 mice Ad5-RBD vaccine was inferior to Ad5-S, suggesting that the RBD fragment does not contain a sufficient collection of helper-T cell epitopes to constitute an optimal vaccine antigen. Our data add to previous promising preclinical results on intranasal SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and support the potential of this approach to elicit mucosal immunity for preventing transmission of SARS-CoV-2.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37085458
pii: S0264-410X(23)00403-6
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.04.020
pmc: PMC10114927
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
spike protein, SARS-CoV-2
0
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
0
Viral Vaccines
0
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
Antibodies, Neutralizing
0
Antibodies, Viral
0
Immunoglobulin A
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3233-3246Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Tobias Freitag reports a relationship with Rokote Laboratories Finland Ltd that includes: employment. Kalle Saksela reports a relationship with Rokote Laboratories Finland Ltd that includes: board membership and equity or stocks. Seppo Yla-Herttuala reports a relationship with Rokote Laboratories Finland Ltd that includes: board membership and equity or stocks. Kari Alitalo reports a relationship with Rokote Laboratories Finland Ltd that includes: equity or stocks.
Références
Viruses. 2021 Nov 11;13(11):
pubmed: 34835069
Infect Dis (Lond). 2021 Nov;53(11):876-879
pubmed: 34176397
J Virol. 2011 Jan;85(1):315-23
pubmed: 20962088
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2022 Apr;10(4):e604
pubmed: 35349752
Front Immunol. 2020 May 19;11:909
pubmed: 32508823
Hum Gene Ther. 1998 Aug 10;9(12):1769-74
pubmed: 9721087
Cell. 2020 Oct 1;183(1):169-184.e13
pubmed: 32931734
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 18;5:16756
pubmed: 26576856
Sci Transl Med. 2022 Aug 17;14(658):eabn6868
pubmed: 35511920
Cell. 2020 Nov 12;183(4):1024-1042.e21
pubmed: 32991844
Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7798):270-273
pubmed: 32015507
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023 Mar;21(3):127-128
pubmed: 36324031
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 13;12(9):e061752
pubmed: 36100306
Hum Gene Ther. 2021 Jul;32(13-14):761-770
pubmed: 33371775
Vaccine. 2014 Nov 20;32(49):6711-23
pubmed: 25454857
J Autoimmun. 2021 Jul;121:102662
pubmed: 34051613
Immunogenetics. 2011 Jun;63(6):325-35
pubmed: 21305276
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Aug 27;70(34):1163-1166
pubmed: 34437519
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3):
pubmed: 31992387
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727-733
pubmed: 31978945
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Dec;9(12):2566-77
pubmed: 23955319
Science. 2021 Jul 23;373(6553):397-399
pubmed: 34437109
Front Immunol. 2022 Apr 27;13:843928
pubmed: 35572592
Viruses. 2021 Jan 20;13(2):
pubmed: 33498157
Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550
pubmed: 25516281
Semin Hematol. 2022 Apr;59(2):97-107
pubmed: 35512907
Sci Transl Med. 2021 Aug 18;13(607):
pubmed: 34315826
Lancet Haematol. 2022 Jan;9(1):e73-e80
pubmed: 34774202
J Virol. 2021 Jan 20;95(8):
pubmed: 33472939
Gastroenterology. 2020 May;158(6):1667-1681.e12
pubmed: 32032584
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Aug 09;9(8):
pubmed: 34452006
J Immunol. 2006 Jun 15;176(12):7715-25
pubmed: 16751419
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 1;26(1):139-40
pubmed: 19910308
Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Aug;10(8):749-760
pubmed: 35644168
Viruses. 2021 May 26;13(6):
pubmed: 34073577
Nat Med. 2021 May;27(5):790-792
pubmed: 33782619