On the interplay between pain observation, guilt and shame proneness and honesty.

Expectations Guilt proneness Morality Pain Performers-observers gap effect

Journal

Acta psychologica
ISSN: 1873-6297
Titre abrégé: Acta Psychol (Amst)
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0370366

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Historique:
received: 08 11 2022
revised: 27 03 2023
accepted: 17 04 2023
medline: 22 5 2023
pubmed: 23 4 2023
entrez: 22 04 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Seeing others in pain can stimulate powerful socio-emotional responses. Does it also make us more moral? In two laboratory experiments, we examined the interplay between pain observation, self-reported guilt and shame, subjective perceptions of pain intensity, and subsequent honest behavior. Watching a confederate perform a moderately painful (vs. non-painful) task did not affect honest behavior in a subsequent die-roll task. Independent of pain observation, there was a positive relationship between self-reported guilt proneness and shame proneness and honesty. More specifically, individuals who are more prone to feeling guilt -and to a lesser extent shame- behaved more honestly. Furthermore, we found weak support for the hypothesis that greater perceived pain (rather than objective pain) is associated with less cheating. We call for further research in the interconnections between perceived pain, guilt, shame, and moral behavior.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37086665
pii: S0001-6918(23)00096-3
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103920
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103920

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no competing interest. The research has been reviewed and approved by the De Videnskabsetiske Komitéer for Region Midtjylland (Forespørgsel 269/2016).

Auteurs

Panagiotis Mitkidis (P)

Department of Management, Aarhus University, Fuglesangs Alle 4, 8210 Aarhus V, Denmark; Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, 334 Blackwell Street, Durham 27701, NC, USA. Electronic address: pm@mgmt.au.dk.

Thaler Hanna (T)

Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Kraepelinstr. 2-10, 80804 Munich, Germany.

Perkovic Sonja (P)

Department of Management, Aarhus University, Fuglesangs Alle 4, 8210 Aarhus V, Denmark.

Ayal Shahar (A)

Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Reichman University, 8 Ha'universuta St., P.O. Box 167, Herzliya 46150, Israel.

Karg Simon (K)

Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 7, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.

Ariely Dan (A)

Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, 334 Blackwell Street, Durham 27701, NC, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH