On the interplay between pain observation, guilt and shame proneness and honesty.
Expectations
Guilt proneness
Morality
Pain
Performers-observers gap effect
Journal
Acta psychologica
ISSN: 1873-6297
Titre abrégé: Acta Psychol (Amst)
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0370366
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
08
11
2022
revised:
27
03
2023
accepted:
17
04
2023
medline:
22
5
2023
pubmed:
23
4
2023
entrez:
22
04
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Seeing others in pain can stimulate powerful socio-emotional responses. Does it also make us more moral? In two laboratory experiments, we examined the interplay between pain observation, self-reported guilt and shame, subjective perceptions of pain intensity, and subsequent honest behavior. Watching a confederate perform a moderately painful (vs. non-painful) task did not affect honest behavior in a subsequent die-roll task. Independent of pain observation, there was a positive relationship between self-reported guilt proneness and shame proneness and honesty. More specifically, individuals who are more prone to feeling guilt -and to a lesser extent shame- behaved more honestly. Furthermore, we found weak support for the hypothesis that greater perceived pain (rather than objective pain) is associated with less cheating. We call for further research in the interconnections between perceived pain, guilt, shame, and moral behavior.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37086665
pii: S0001-6918(23)00096-3
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103920
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
103920Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no competing interest. The research has been reviewed and approved by the De Videnskabsetiske Komitéer for Region Midtjylland (Forespørgsel 269/2016).