The Effect of Critical Thinking on Translation Technology Competence Among College Students: The Chain Mediating Role of Academic Self-Efficacy and Cultural Intelligence.
academic self-efficacy
critical thinking
cultural intelligence
student translator
translation technology competence
Journal
Psychology research and behavior management
ISSN: 1179-1578
Titre abrégé: Psychol Res Behav Manag
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101514563
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
28
02
2023
accepted:
12
04
2023
medline:
24
4
2023
pubmed:
24
4
2023
entrez:
24
04
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It is increasingly essential for translators to possess a high level of technological proficiency to succeed in their work, as technology is becoming an integral part and common practice of the translation industry. Several previous studies found that critical thinking, academic self-efficacy, and cultural intelligence independently influenced the translation competence of college students. However, the underlying psychological mechanism through which these salient factors affect student translators' technology competence has not been fully explored. Therefore, this research sought to examine the systematic interactions between critical thinking, academic self-efficacy, cultural intelligence, and translation technology competence among college students. This study adopted an empirical approach to collect data from 663 seniors from 7 colleges in China. The questionnaires of the Critical Thinking Disposition Scale (CTDS), General Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (GASE), Short Form measure of Cultural Intelligence (SFCQ), and Translation Technology Competence Scale (TTCS) were used for the online survey. The quantitative data were investigated by employing descriptive statistics with SPSS 27, covariance-based structural equation modelling with AMOS 24 to test the proposed hypotheses by assessing relationships between observed and latent variables, and bootstrap method with PROCESS 3.5 to examine the mediating effects. Critical thinking, academic self-efficacy, and cultural intelligence were significant predictors of students' translation technology competence. Additionally, academic self-efficacy and cultural intelligence acted as independent and chain mediators in the relationship between critical thinking and student translators' technology competence. The findings provide valuable insight into how psychological factors, including critical thinking, academic self-efficacy, and cultural intelligence, can impact students' competence in translation technology. This study contributes to future research and practices that seek to understand how these psychological factors can be leveraged to promote students' success in translation technologies.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
It is increasingly essential for translators to possess a high level of technological proficiency to succeed in their work, as technology is becoming an integral part and common practice of the translation industry. Several previous studies found that critical thinking, academic self-efficacy, and cultural intelligence independently influenced the translation competence of college students. However, the underlying psychological mechanism through which these salient factors affect student translators' technology competence has not been fully explored. Therefore, this research sought to examine the systematic interactions between critical thinking, academic self-efficacy, cultural intelligence, and translation technology competence among college students.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
This study adopted an empirical approach to collect data from 663 seniors from 7 colleges in China. The questionnaires of the Critical Thinking Disposition Scale (CTDS), General Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (GASE), Short Form measure of Cultural Intelligence (SFCQ), and Translation Technology Competence Scale (TTCS) were used for the online survey. The quantitative data were investigated by employing descriptive statistics with SPSS 27, covariance-based structural equation modelling with AMOS 24 to test the proposed hypotheses by assessing relationships between observed and latent variables, and bootstrap method with PROCESS 3.5 to examine the mediating effects.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Critical thinking, academic self-efficacy, and cultural intelligence were significant predictors of students' translation technology competence. Additionally, academic self-efficacy and cultural intelligence acted as independent and chain mediators in the relationship between critical thinking and student translators' technology competence.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
The findings provide valuable insight into how psychological factors, including critical thinking, academic self-efficacy, and cultural intelligence, can impact students' competence in translation technology. This study contributes to future research and practices that seek to understand how these psychological factors can be leveraged to promote students' success in translation technologies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37089820
doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S408477
pii: 408477
pmc: PMC10120820
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1233-1256Informations de copyright
© 2023 Li et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91
pubmed: 18697684
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55
pubmed: 28029643
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215
pubmed: 847061
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2022 Mar;44(3):1264-1277
pubmed: 32877333
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 May 31;2022:3385477
pubmed: 35685136
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 14;13:899706
pubmed: 35774941
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 25;13:978144
pubmed: 36092063
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 30;11(1):13564
pubmed: 34193907
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Feb 15;15:291-303
pubmed: 35210878
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Oct 10;2022:6305590
pubmed: 36262936
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Jul;78:14-18
pubmed: 31029953
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Oct 13;15:2989-3002
pubmed: 36263007
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Nov 12;29(4):1896-1909
pubmed: 32663038
Community Ment Health J. 2023 Apr;59(3):512-522
pubmed: 36198995
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 23;13:944265
pubmed: 36211847
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 06;13:865581
pubmed: 35734457
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Jun 03;15:1397-1410
pubmed: 35685816
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Mar;33(3):275-80
pubmed: 22682061
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 06;12:642566
pubmed: 33889115
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2018 May 28;11:217-226
pubmed: 29881315
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903
pubmed: 14516251
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022 Jan 23;:1-13
pubmed: 35095352