Treatment gaps in the implementation of LDL cholesterol control among high- and very high-risk patients in Europe between 2020 and 2021: the multinational observational SANTORINI study.
Cardiovascular disease
Cohort study
High cardiovascular risk
LDL cholesterol
Lipid-lowering therapy
Real-world evidence
Journal
The Lancet regional health. Europe
ISSN: 2666-7762
Titre abrégé: Lancet Reg Health Eur
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101777707
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
13
10
2022
revised:
14
03
2023
accepted:
16
03
2023
medline:
24
4
2023
pubmed:
24
4
2023
entrez:
24
04
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
European data pre-2019 suggest statin monotherapy is the most common approach to lipid management for preventing cardiovascular (CV) events, resulting in only one-fifth of high- and very high-risk patients achieving the 2019 ESC/EAS recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. Whether the treatment landscape has evolved, or gaps persist remains of interest. Baseline data are presented from SANTORINI, an observational, prospective study that documents the use of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) in patients ≥18 years at high or very high CV risk between 2020 and 2021 across primary and secondary care settings in 14 European countries. Of 9602 enrolled patients, 9044 with complete data were included (mean age: 65.3 ± 10.9 years; 72.6% male). Physicians reported using 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines as a basis for CV risk classification in 52.0% (4706/9044) of patients (overall: high risk 29.2%; very high risk 70.8%). However, centrally re-assessed CV risk based on 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines suggested 6.5% (308/4706) and 91.0% (4284/4706) were high- and very high-risk patients, respectively. Overall, 21.8% of patients had no documented LLTs, 54.2% were receiving monotherapy and 24.0% combination LLT. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) LDL-C was 2.1 (1.6, 3.0) mmol/L (82 [60, 117] mg/dL), with 20.1% of patients achieving risk-based LDL-C goals as per the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines. At the time of study enrolment, 80% of high- and very high-risk patients failed to achieve 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines LDL-C goals. Contributory factors may include CV risk underestimation and underutilization of combination therapies. Further efforts are needed to achieve current guideline-recommended LDL-C goals. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04271280. This study is funded by Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
European data pre-2019 suggest statin monotherapy is the most common approach to lipid management for preventing cardiovascular (CV) events, resulting in only one-fifth of high- and very high-risk patients achieving the 2019 ESC/EAS recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. Whether the treatment landscape has evolved, or gaps persist remains of interest.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Baseline data are presented from SANTORINI, an observational, prospective study that documents the use of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) in patients ≥18 years at high or very high CV risk between 2020 and 2021 across primary and secondary care settings in 14 European countries.
Findings
UNASSIGNED
Of 9602 enrolled patients, 9044 with complete data were included (mean age: 65.3 ± 10.9 years; 72.6% male). Physicians reported using 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines as a basis for CV risk classification in 52.0% (4706/9044) of patients (overall: high risk 29.2%; very high risk 70.8%). However, centrally re-assessed CV risk based on 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines suggested 6.5% (308/4706) and 91.0% (4284/4706) were high- and very high-risk patients, respectively. Overall, 21.8% of patients had no documented LLTs, 54.2% were receiving monotherapy and 24.0% combination LLT. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) LDL-C was 2.1 (1.6, 3.0) mmol/L (82 [60, 117] mg/dL), with 20.1% of patients achieving risk-based LDL-C goals as per the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines.
Interpretation
UNASSIGNED
At the time of study enrolment, 80% of high- and very high-risk patients failed to achieve 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines LDL-C goals. Contributory factors may include CV risk underestimation and underutilization of combination therapies. Further efforts are needed to achieve current guideline-recommended LDL-C goals.
Trial registration
UNASSIGNED
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04271280.
Funding
UNASSIGNED
This study is funded by Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37090089
doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100624
pii: S2666-7762(23)00043-1
pmc: PMC10119631
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04271280']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100624Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
K.K.R. has received honoraria for consulting, lectures from Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cargene, CRISPR, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly Company, Esperion, Kowa, New Amsterdam Pharma, Novartis Corporation, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, SCRIBE, Silence Therapeutics, and VAXXINITY. In addition, he has received research grant support to his institution from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi and Regeneron. A.L.C. has received honoraria, lecture fees, or research grants from: Aegerion, Amgen, Amryt, AstraZeneca, Amarin, Daiichi Sankyo, Esperion, Ionis Pharmaceutical, Kowa, Medscape, Menarini, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, PeerVoice, Pfizer, Recordati, Regeneron, Sandoz, Sanofi, The Corpus. In addition, he has received research grants from Sanofi, Eli Lilly, Mylan, Sanofi Regeneron, Menarini, and Amgen. J.F. has received lecture fees from Akcea, Amgen, Lilly, Mylan, MSD, Sanofi and Servier. C.A. has received honoraria for consultancy and/or lectures fees from Abbott, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Medinfar, and Tecnimede. In addition, he has received support from Tecnimede for attending meetings and/or travel. D.L.C. has received fees for advisory boards, research and lectures from, Daiichi Sankyo, and Novartis. T.S. has received consulting fees and research and educational grants from Amgen, Novartis, Orion Pharma, Pfizer, Sankyo, Sanofi and Servier. He has received payment or honoraria for lectures by profit and non-profit entities; support by the European Geriatric Medicine Society for attending meetings; he chaired the committee behind the publication of the National Finnish guideline for dyslipidaemia; lastly, he declared to be a statin patient. H.T. has received consulting and lecture fees as well as grants from Daiichi Sankyo. M.A. has received consulting and lecture fees from Alfasigma, Amgen, Amryt, IONIS/Akcea Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Regeneron and Sanofi. He has also received research grants from Amgen, Amryt, IONIS/Akcea Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron and Sanofi and payments for advisory board participation from Alfasigma, Amgen, Amryt, Pfizer. E.R. has received honoraria for lectures from Daiichi Sankyo, Servier and Novartis; payments for attending meetings from Sanofi; and for attending advisory boards from Amarin and Novartis; all paid directly to Ghent University. He is also President of the Belgian Atherosclerosis Society and a member of the Superior Health Council of Belgium, all voluntary roles. D.N. is or has been an investigator in clinical studies sponsored by Amgen, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo and Novartis; he has not received any personal fees for this work. J.M.M. has received lecture fees from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Ferrer, Novartis, Servier, Sanofi and Viatris; and consultancy fees from Amgen, Sanofi, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Servier. He has also received support from Sanofi and Amgen for attending meetings. U.L. has received honoraria for lectures and participation in advisory boards from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis and Sanofi. He has also received research grants to Leipzig University from Daiichi Sankyo, Amgen and Novartis, and is a member of DACH, DGK and ESC. I.H., M.C.M. and Aikaterini Bilitou are employees of Daiichi Sankyo and Annie Burden is a contract employee of Daiichi Sankyo. F.L.J.V. and M.E. declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Circulation. 2008 Feb 12;117(6):743-53
pubmed: 18212285
Eur Heart J. 2022 May 7;43(18):1715-1727
pubmed: 35165703
Circulation. 2019 Apr 2;139(14):e698-e800
pubmed: 30586767
Lancet. 2005 Oct 8;366(9493):1267-78
pubmed: 16214597
Lancet. 2012 Aug 11;380(9841):581-90
pubmed: 22607822
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Dec;23(18):2007-2018
pubmed: 27638542
Atherosclerosis. 2016 Dec;255:200-209
pubmed: 27667299
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Dec;7(6):633-639
pubmed: 29302468
Atherosclerosis. 2020 Dec;314:74-76
pubmed: 33222882
Atheroscler Plus. 2021 Aug 13;43:24-30
pubmed: 36644508
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jun 21;41(24):2313-2330
pubmed: 32052833
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 Dec;25(18):1966-1976
pubmed: 30335504
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 7;42(34):3227-3337
pubmed: 34458905
Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 22;43(8):830-833
pubmed: 34636884
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019 May;26(8):824-835
pubmed: 30739508
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Sep 20;28(11):1279-1289
pubmed: 33580789
Atherosclerosis. 2021 May;325:99-109
pubmed: 33892925
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Oct 1;5(10):1124-1135
pubmed: 32609313
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 14;380(11):1022-1032
pubmed: 30865796
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Dec;37(12):2049-2059
pubmed: 34517739
Circulation. 2016 Nov 8;134(19):1419-1429
pubmed: 27682883
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022 Jun 6;8(4):447-460
pubmed: 35175350
Eur Heart J. 2017 Aug 21;38(32):2459-2472
pubmed: 28444290
Atherosclerosis. 2021 Apr;322:8-14
pubmed: 33706084
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 1;41(1):111-188
pubmed: 31504418
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022 Mar 30;29(4):654-663
pubmed: 34160035
Eur Heart J. 2016 Nov 7;37(42):3232-3245
pubmed: 27523477
Am Heart J. 2019 Oct;216:30-41
pubmed: 31386936