IMMUNOREACT 5: female patients with rectal cancer have better immune editing mechanisms than male patients - a cohort study.
Journal
International journal of surgery (London, England)
ISSN: 1743-9159
Titre abrégé: Int J Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101228232
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Mar 2023
01 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
06
09
2022
accepted:
05
01
2023
medline:
26
4
2023
pubmed:
24
4
2023
entrez:
24
04
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Studies evaluating sex differences in colorectal cancer (CRC) tumor microenvironment are limited, and no previous study has focused on rectal cancer patients' constitutive immune surveillance mechanisms. The authors aimed to assess gender-related differences in the immune microenvironment of rectal cancer patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted up to 31 May 2021, including studies focusing on gender-related differences in the CRC tumor microenvironment. Data on the mutational profile of rectal cancer were extracted from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). A subanalysis of the two IMMUNOREACT trials (NCT04915326 and NCT04917263) was performed, aiming to detect gender-related differences in the immune microenvironment of the healthy mucosa in patients with early (IMMUNOREACT 1 cohort) and locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy (IMMUNOREACT 2 cohort). In the retrospective IMMUNOREACT 1 cohort (therapy naive), the authors enrolled 442 patients (177 female and 265 male), while in the retrospective IMMUNOREACT 2 cohort (patients who had neoadjuvant therapy), we enrolled 264 patients (80 female and 184 male). In the prospective IMMUNOREACT 1 cohort (therapy naive), the authors enrolled 72 patients (26 female and 46 male), while in the prospective IMMUNOREACT 2 cohort (patients who had neoadjuvant therapy), the authors enrolled 105 patients (42 female and 63 male). Seven studies reported PD-L1 expression in the CRC microenvironment, but no significant difference could be identified between the sexes. In the TGCA series, mutations of SYNE1 and RYR2 were significantly more frequent in male patients with rectal cancer. In the IMMUNOREACT 1 cohort, male patients had a higher expression of epithelial cells expressing HLA class I, while female patients had a higher number of activated CD4+Th1 cells. Female patients in the IMMUNOREACT 2 cohort showed a higher infiltration of epithelial cells expressing CD86 and activated cytotoxic T cells (P=0.01). Male patients have more frequent oncogene mutations associated with a lower expression of T-cell activation genes. In the healthy mucosa of female patients, more Th1 cells and cytotoxic T cells suggest a potentially better immune response to the tumor. Sex should be considered when defining the treatment strategy for rectal cancer patients or designing prognostic scores.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Studies evaluating sex differences in colorectal cancer (CRC) tumor microenvironment are limited, and no previous study has focused on rectal cancer patients' constitutive immune surveillance mechanisms. The authors aimed to assess gender-related differences in the immune microenvironment of rectal cancer patients.
METHODS
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted up to 31 May 2021, including studies focusing on gender-related differences in the CRC tumor microenvironment. Data on the mutational profile of rectal cancer were extracted from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). A subanalysis of the two IMMUNOREACT trials (NCT04915326 and NCT04917263) was performed, aiming to detect gender-related differences in the immune microenvironment of the healthy mucosa in patients with early (IMMUNOREACT 1 cohort) and locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy (IMMUNOREACT 2 cohort). In the retrospective IMMUNOREACT 1 cohort (therapy naive), the authors enrolled 442 patients (177 female and 265 male), while in the retrospective IMMUNOREACT 2 cohort (patients who had neoadjuvant therapy), we enrolled 264 patients (80 female and 184 male). In the prospective IMMUNOREACT 1 cohort (therapy naive), the authors enrolled 72 patients (26 female and 46 male), while in the prospective IMMUNOREACT 2 cohort (patients who had neoadjuvant therapy), the authors enrolled 105 patients (42 female and 63 male).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Seven studies reported PD-L1 expression in the CRC microenvironment, but no significant difference could be identified between the sexes. In the TGCA series, mutations of SYNE1 and RYR2 were significantly more frequent in male patients with rectal cancer. In the IMMUNOREACT 1 cohort, male patients had a higher expression of epithelial cells expressing HLA class I, while female patients had a higher number of activated CD4+Th1 cells. Female patients in the IMMUNOREACT 2 cohort showed a higher infiltration of epithelial cells expressing CD86 and activated cytotoxic T cells (P=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Male patients have more frequent oncogene mutations associated with a lower expression of T-cell activation genes. In the healthy mucosa of female patients, more Th1 cells and cytotoxic T cells suggest a potentially better immune response to the tumor. Sex should be considered when defining the treatment strategy for rectal cancer patients or designing prognostic scores.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37093072
doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000214
pii: 01279778-202303000-00017
pmc: PMC10389582
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04915326']
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Meta-Analysis
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
323-332Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Références
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1292:97-112
pubmed: 32542457
Br J Cancer. 2013 Jul 23;109(2):395-400
pubmed: 23820252
Nat Commun. 2020 Aug 28;11(1):4330
pubmed: 32859912
Oncotarget. 2022 Jan 05;13:18-31
pubmed: 35018217
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013 Apr;51(4):713-27
pubmed: 23515103
Hum Pathol. 2015 May;46(5):665-72
pubmed: 25800719
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Nov 03;2021:8072796
pubmed: 34888385
Br J Cancer. 2016 Aug 9;115(4):490-6
pubmed: 27404452
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Oct 15;15(20):6412-20
pubmed: 19825961
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2535
pubmed: 19622551
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 May;70(3):145-164
pubmed: 32133645
Nat Commun. 2019 Dec 17;10(1):5745
pubmed: 31848339
Oncoimmunology. 2018 Jun 11;7(8):e1465165
pubmed: 30221062
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Aug 11;12(8):
pubmed: 32796628
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019 May 9;38(1):190
pubmed: 31072360
Science. 2006 Sep 29;313(5795):1960-4
pubmed: 17008531
Br J Cancer. 2015 Dec 22;113(12):1677-86
pubmed: 26645238
Biomed Pharmacother. 2019 Feb;110:312-318
pubmed: 30522017
Mod Pathol. 2019 Jun;32(6):866-883
pubmed: 30723299
Oncoimmunology. 2021 Apr 5;10(1):1907912
pubmed: 33868791
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 May 15;20(10):2773-82
pubmed: 24647569
Oncotarget. 2015 Aug 21;6(24):20058-69
pubmed: 25595911
Oncol Lett. 2016 Aug;12(2):944-950
pubmed: 27446374
N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 22;353(25):2654-66
pubmed: 16371631
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Jun;49(9):2233-42
pubmed: 23478000
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun;17(6):1471-4
pubmed: 20180029
World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jan 4;17(1):4
pubmed: 30609938
Int J Surg. 2021 Dec;96:106165
pubmed: 34774726
Eur Surg. 2016;48(6):352-356
pubmed: 28058043
Int J Cancer. 2020 Aug 15;147(4):920-930
pubmed: 31863463
Am J Cancer Res. 2015 Jun 15;5(7):2277-84
pubmed: 26328258
Dis Markers. 2014;2014:792183
pubmed: 25609852
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015 Aug 01;8(8):9351-9
pubmed: 26464688
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Feb;27(2):196-205
pubmed: 27870715