Hybrid umbilical cord blood banking: literature review.
Hybrid split model
Hybrid umbilical cord blood banking
Private umbilical cord blood banking
Public umbilical cord blood banking
Sequential hybrid model
Umbilical cord blood banking
Journal
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
ISSN: 1432-0711
Titre abrégé: Arch Gynecol Obstet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8710213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Apr 2023
24 Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
24
01
2023
accepted:
03
03
2023
medline:
24
4
2023
pubmed:
24
4
2023
entrez:
24
04
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Interest gaps between public and private umbilical cord blood banks have led to the introduction of hybrid banking options. Hybrid models combine features of private and public banks as well as interests of parents, children and of patients, in order to find an optimized solution. While several different models of hybrid banks exist, there is a lack of literature about this novel model of cord blood stem cell banking. Therefore, the aim of this literature review is to assess different options of umbilical cord blood banking and whether hybrid banking could be a valuable alternative to the existing public and private cord blood banking models. We performed a systematic literature search, using five main databases. Five hybrid models regarding their advantages as well as their challenges are discussed in this review. We found that a wealth of literature exists about public cord blood banking, while private and hybrid banking are understudied. Different modalities of hybrid cord blood banking are being described in several publications, providing the basis to assess different advantages and disadvantages as well as practicability. Hybrid banks, especially the sequential model, seem to have potential as an alternative to the existing banking models worldwide. A previously conducted survey among pregnant women showed a preference for hybrid banking, if such an option was available. Nevertheless, opinions among stakeholders differ and more research is needed to evaluate, if hybrid banking provides the expected benefits.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37093267
doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07003-x
pii: 10.1007/s00404-023-07003-x
pmc: PMC10124678
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Med Ethics. 2015 Mar;41(3):272-5
pubmed: 24825373
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2011 Nov-Dec;36(6):344-50; quiz 351-2
pubmed: 21918487
Transfusion. 2003 May;43(5):604-8
pubmed: 12702181
Transfusion. 2011 Mar;51(3):578-86
pubmed: 21126259
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011 Aug;28(8):669-76
pubmed: 21617932
Blood Rev. 2011 Nov;25(6):255-9
pubmed: 21764191
Cytotherapy. 2019 Nov;21(11):1112-1121
pubmed: 31587876
BMJ. 2008 Mar 22;336(7645):642-4
pubmed: 18356233
Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Apr;32(4):318-9
pubmed: 24714475
Pediatr Res. 2018 Jan;83(1-2):333-344
pubmed: 28937975
J Law Med. 2012 Mar;19(3):512-6
pubmed: 22558903
Transfusion. 2013 Jul;53(7):1510-9
pubmed: 23067293
Vox Sang. 2008 Nov;95(4):335-48
pubmed: 19138265
Med J Aust. 2013 Aug 19;199(4):290-2
pubmed: 23984790
Cell Prolif. 2011 Apr;44 Suppl 1:30-4
pubmed: 21481040
Pediatrics. 2017 Nov;140(5):
pubmed: 29084832
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017 Dec;6(12):2071-2078
pubmed: 29080265
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2018 Sep;7(9):643-650
pubmed: 29777574
Birth. 2014 Dec;41(4):360-6
pubmed: 24988997
Cell Tissue Bank. 2020 Jun;21(2):279-287
pubmed: 32162161
Hum Cell. 2021 Jan;34(1):1-13
pubmed: 33033884
PLoS Med. 2005 Feb;2(2):e44
pubmed: 15737000
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2018 Feb;57(2):161-167
pubmed: 28952356
Br J Haematol. 2007 Apr;137(1):20-35
pubmed: 17359369
Lancet. 2007 Feb 10;369(9560):437
pubmed: 17292740
BMJ. 2007 Feb 10;334(7588):277
pubmed: 17289702
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2018 May;18(5):515-524
pubmed: 29421958
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Mar;14(3):356-63
pubmed: 18275904
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2017 Jun;17(6):691-699
pubmed: 28379044
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;133(3):e249-e253
pubmed: 30801478
Nat Rev Cancer. 2008 Jul;8(7):555-63
pubmed: 18548085
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020 Feb 3;11(1):43
pubmed: 32014055
Blood. 2013 Jul 25;122(4):491-8
pubmed: 23673863
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020 Jan;55(1):48-61
pubmed: 31089283
J Blood Med. 2014 Jun 18;5:87-97
pubmed: 24971040
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct;114(4):848-855
pubmed: 19888044
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005 Sep 1;207(2 Suppl):538-43
pubmed: 15982697
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Jul;284(1):99-104
pubmed: 20658141
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Mar;14(3):316-22
pubmed: 18275898
Exp Neurol. 2018 Oct;308:120-131
pubmed: 30012511
Med J Aust. 2008 May 5;188(9):533-5
pubmed: 18459926
Indian Pediatr. 2018 Jun 15;55(6):489-494
pubmed: 29978816
Cell Transplant. 2018 Feb;27(2):325-334
pubmed: 29637820
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015 Oct;50(10):1271-8
pubmed: 26030051
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Apr 19;16:81
pubmed: 27094796
Front Med (Lausanne). 2016 Jan 08;2:94
pubmed: 26779485