Cardio4Health Study, a Cardiac Telerehabilitation Pilot Program Aimed at Patients After an Ischemic Event: Cross-sectional Study.
cardiac rehabilitation
ischemic heart disease
remote care
telemedicine
web-based platform
Journal
JMIR cardio
ISSN: 2561-1011
Titre abrégé: JMIR Cardio
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101718325
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Apr 2023
24 Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
09
11
2022
accepted:
12
03
2023
revised:
14
02
2023
medline:
24
4
2023
pubmed:
24
4
2023
entrez:
24
04
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Center-based cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRPs) reduce morbidity and mortality after an ischemic cardiac event; however, they are widely underused. Home-based CRP has emerged as an alternative to improve patient adherence; however, its safety and efficacy remain unclear, especially for older patients and female patients. This study aimed to develop a holistic home-based CRP for patients with ischemic heart disease and evaluate its safety and impact on functional capacity, adherence to a healthy lifestyle, and quality of life. The 8-week home-based CRP included patients of both sexes, with no age limit, who had overcome an acute myocardial infarction in the previous 3 months, had a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥40%, and had access to a tablet or mobile device. The CRP was developed using a dedicated platform designed explicitly for this purpose and included 3 weekly exercise sessions combining tailored aerobic and strength training and 2 weekly educational session focused on lifestyle habits, therapeutic adherence, and patient empowerment. We initially included 62 patients, of whom 1 was excluded for presenting with ventricular arrhythmias during the initial stress test, 5 were excluded because of incompatibility, and 6 dropped out because of a technological barrier. Ultimately, 50 patients completed the program: 85% (42/50) were male, with a mean age of 58.9 (SD 10.3) years, a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 52.1% (SD 6.72%), and 25 (50%) New York Heart Association functional class I and 25 (50%) New York Heart Association II-III. The CRP significantly improved functional capacity (+1.6 metabolic equivalent tasks), muscle strength (arm curl test +15.5% and sit-to-stand test +19.7%), weekly training volume (+803 metabolic equivalent tasks), adherence to the Mediterranean diet, emotional state (anxiety), and quality of life. No major complications occurred, and adherence was excellent (>80%) in both the exercise and educational sessions. In the subgroup analysis, CRP showed equivalent beneficial effects irrespective of sex and age. In addition, patient preferences for CRP approaches were equally distributed, with one-third (14/50, 29%) of the patients preferring a face-to-face CRP, one-third (17/50, 34%) preferring a telematic CRP, and one-third (18/50, 37%) preferring a hybrid approach. Regarding CRP duration, 63% (31/50) of the patients considered it adequate, whereas the remaining 37% (19/50) preferred a longer program. A holistic telematic CRP dedicated to patients after an ischemic cardiac event, irrespective of sex and age, is safe and, in our population, has achieved positive results in improving maximal aerobic capacity, weekly training volume, muscle strength, quality of life, compliance with diet, and anxiety symptoms. The preference for a center- or home-based CRP approach is diverse among the study population, emphasizing the need for a tailored CRP to improve adherence and completion rates.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Center-based cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRPs) reduce morbidity and mortality after an ischemic cardiac event; however, they are widely underused. Home-based CRP has emerged as an alternative to improve patient adherence; however, its safety and efficacy remain unclear, especially for older patients and female patients.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to develop a holistic home-based CRP for patients with ischemic heart disease and evaluate its safety and impact on functional capacity, adherence to a healthy lifestyle, and quality of life.
METHODS
METHODS
The 8-week home-based CRP included patients of both sexes, with no age limit, who had overcome an acute myocardial infarction in the previous 3 months, had a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥40%, and had access to a tablet or mobile device. The CRP was developed using a dedicated platform designed explicitly for this purpose and included 3 weekly exercise sessions combining tailored aerobic and strength training and 2 weekly educational session focused on lifestyle habits, therapeutic adherence, and patient empowerment.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We initially included 62 patients, of whom 1 was excluded for presenting with ventricular arrhythmias during the initial stress test, 5 were excluded because of incompatibility, and 6 dropped out because of a technological barrier. Ultimately, 50 patients completed the program: 85% (42/50) were male, with a mean age of 58.9 (SD 10.3) years, a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 52.1% (SD 6.72%), and 25 (50%) New York Heart Association functional class I and 25 (50%) New York Heart Association II-III. The CRP significantly improved functional capacity (+1.6 metabolic equivalent tasks), muscle strength (arm curl test +15.5% and sit-to-stand test +19.7%), weekly training volume (+803 metabolic equivalent tasks), adherence to the Mediterranean diet, emotional state (anxiety), and quality of life. No major complications occurred, and adherence was excellent (>80%) in both the exercise and educational sessions. In the subgroup analysis, CRP showed equivalent beneficial effects irrespective of sex and age. In addition, patient preferences for CRP approaches were equally distributed, with one-third (14/50, 29%) of the patients preferring a face-to-face CRP, one-third (17/50, 34%) preferring a telematic CRP, and one-third (18/50, 37%) preferring a hybrid approach. Regarding CRP duration, 63% (31/50) of the patients considered it adequate, whereas the remaining 37% (19/50) preferred a longer program.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
A holistic telematic CRP dedicated to patients after an ischemic cardiac event, irrespective of sex and age, is safe and, in our population, has achieved positive results in improving maximal aerobic capacity, weekly training volume, muscle strength, quality of life, compliance with diet, and anxiety symptoms. The preference for a center- or home-based CRP approach is diverse among the study population, emphasizing the need for a tailored CRP to improve adherence and completion rates.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37093637
pii: v7i1e44179
doi: 10.2196/44179
pmc: PMC10167584
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e44179Informations de copyright
©Margarita Calvo-López, Raquel Arranz Tolós, Josefa Marin Expósito, Domenico Gruosso, Rut Andrea, Mercè Roque, Carles Falces, Gemma Yago, Judith Saura Araguas, Nuria Pastor, Marta Sitges, Maria Sanz-de la Garza. Originally published in JMIR Cardio (https://cardio.jmir.org), 24.04.2023.
Références
Maturitas. 2022 Jun;160:32-60
pubmed: 35550706
Heart Fail Rev. 2018 Jan;23(1):73-89
pubmed: 29199385
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 May;24(7):688-697
pubmed: 28071146
Can J Cardiol. 2014 Jul;30(7):793-800
pubmed: 24726052
Cardiol Res Pract. 2020 Mar 21;2020:1236968
pubmed: 32274208
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Jun;20(2 Suppl):12-6
pubmed: 23702985
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Jan;60(1):6-12
pubmed: 27771272
Eur Heart J. 1999 Feb;20(4):269-77
pubmed: 10099921
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 7;10(6):e036089
pubmed: 32513887
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Sep 2;19(1):615
pubmed: 31477103
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Aug 20;167(4):1390-5
pubmed: 22575623
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 27;8(11):e17957
pubmed: 33245286
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2018 Oct;27:120-126
pubmed: 30144884
N Engl J Med. 2022 Sep 15;387(11):967-977
pubmed: 36018037
Heart. 2020 May;106(10):724-731
pubmed: 32098809
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jan 5;67(1):1-12
pubmed: 26764059
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;228:58-67
pubmed: 27863363
J Sports Sci Med. 2011 Mar 01;10(1):130-6
pubmed: 24149305
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 15;10(8):
pubmed: 33920796
Can J Cardiol. 2016 Nov;32(11):1316-1324
pubmed: 27129618
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 7;41(2):255-323
pubmed: 31497854
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2129-2200
pubmed: 27206819
Lancet. 1994 Jun 11;343(8911):1454-9
pubmed: 7911176
Global Health. 2020 Jul 6;16(1):57
pubmed: 32631403
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2021 Jul 1;41(4):207-213
pubmed: 34158454
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2003 Jul-Aug;25(4):277-83
pubmed: 12850660
Can J Cardiol. 2016 Oct;32(10 Suppl 2):S365-S373
pubmed: 27692117
Psychol Health Med. 2011 May;16(3):276-90
pubmed: 21491336
J Vasc Res. 2001 Sep-Oct;38(5):415-22
pubmed: 11561143
Can J Cardiol. 2019 Mar;35(3):352-364
pubmed: 30825955
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Feb;43(2):163-170
pubmed: 31823400
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jun 19;49(24):2329-36
pubmed: 17572248
Rehabil Process Outcome. 2020 Aug 25;9:1179572720941833
pubmed: 34497468
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2015 Jul-Aug;35(4):255-62
pubmed: 26110624
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Dec;23(18):1914-1939
pubmed: 27777324
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013 Jan;113(1):147-55
pubmed: 22615009
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 21;378(25):e34
pubmed: 29897866
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Aug;17(4):410-8
pubmed: 20300001
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-477
pubmed: 31504439
Cureus. 2021 Dec 31;13(12):e20851
pubmed: 35141096
Physiother Theory Pract. 2021 Jan;37(1):158-168
pubmed: 31155986
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 27;22(1):232
pubmed: 33639913
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Mar 13;:
pubmed: 28365100
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Aug;7(8):691-705
pubmed: 31302050
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss Pratique. 2020 Jun;2020(289):16-21
pubmed: 32562474
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 1;230:493-508
pubmed: 28040292
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Mar 23;77(11):1454-1469
pubmed: 33736829
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 1;41(1):111-188
pubmed: 31504418
Am J Med. 2015 Mar;128(3):229-38
pubmed: 25447615
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 30;6:CD007130
pubmed: 28665511
J Hypertens. 2018 Oct;36(10):1953-2041
pubmed: 30234752
J Diabetes Res. 2014;2014:726861
pubmed: 24563869
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jun 30;54(1):25-33
pubmed: 19555836
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 May;108(21):359-64
pubmed: 21691559
Aten Primaria. 2001 Oct 15;28(6):425-30
pubmed: 11602124
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2014 Sep-Oct;34(5):327-34
pubmed: 24866355