Clinically differential diagnosis of human granulocytic anaplasmosis and severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 04 2023
26 04 2023
Historique:
received:
21
12
2021
accepted:
22
03
2023
medline:
28
4
2023
pubmed:
27
4
2023
entrez:
26
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study analyzed HGA and SFTS in patients with suspected tick-borne infection by focusing on key differences that clinicians can easily recognize. A retrospective analysis was performed on confirmed patients with HGA or SFTS in 21 Korean hospitals from 2013 to 2020. A scoring system was developed by multivariate regression analysis and accuracy assessment of clinically easily discriminable parameters was performed. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that sex (especially male sex) (odds ratio [OR] 11.45, P = 0.012), neutropenia (< 1500) (OR 41.64, P < 0.001), prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (OR 80.133, P < 0.001), and normal C-reactive protein concentration (≤ 1.0 mg/dL; OR 166.855, P = 0.001) were significantly associated with SFTS but not with HGA. Each factor, such as meaningful variables, was given 1 point, and a receiver-operating characteristic curve with a cutoff value (> 1) in a 5-point scoring system (0-4 points) was analyzed to evaluate the accuracy of differentiation between HGA and SFTS. The system showed 94.5% sensitivity, 92.6% specificity, and an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.971 (0.949-0.9). Where HGA and SFTS are endemic, the scoring system based on these four parameters such as sex, neutrophil count, activated partial thromboplastin time, and C-reactive protein concentration will facilitate the differential diagnosis of HGA and SFTS in the emergency room in patients with suspected tick-borne infectious diseases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37100782
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32061-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-32061-1
pmc: PMC10133271
doi:
Substances chimiques
C-Reactive Protein
9007-41-4
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.20461980']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6837Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Oct 14;34(39):e257
pubmed: 31602827
Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Oct;22(10):1728-31
pubmed: 27648639
N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 4;365(5):422-9
pubmed: 21812671
Viruses. 2021 Jun 23;13(7):
pubmed: 34201811
Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 May;25(5):1029-1031
pubmed: 31002059
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;26(8):1878-1881
pubmed: 32687023
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012 Feb;12(2):156-60
pubmed: 21955213
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Jul;45(7):2138-43
pubmed: 17475757
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 11;7(5):ofaa125
pubmed: 32478118
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015 Jun;29(2):341-55
pubmed: 25999228
J Vet Sci. 2008 Sep;9(3):285-93
pubmed: 18716449
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Aug;97(2):403-406
pubmed: 28829732
N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 21;364(16):1523-32
pubmed: 21410387
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Feb 19;15(2):e0009128
pubmed: 33606699
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):148-151
pubmed: 31918622
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 30;367(9):834-41
pubmed: 22931317
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Mar;32(3):589-95
pubmed: 8195363
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Nov 2;95(5):1021-1025
pubmed: 27645781
Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Oct;20(10):1708-11
pubmed: 25271737
Sci Rep. 2021 May 25;11(1):10860
pubmed: 34035378