Giving and receiving thanks: a mixed methods pilot study of a gratitude intervention for palliative patients and their carers.

Gratitude Mixed-methods Palliative care Psychological distress Quality of life Quality of relationship

Journal

BMC palliative care
ISSN: 1472-684X
Titre abrégé: BMC Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088685

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Apr 2023
Historique:
received: 16 09 2022
accepted: 12 04 2023
medline: 28 4 2023
pubmed: 27 4 2023
entrez: 26 4 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Psychological research examining the nature and workings of gratitude has burgeoned over the past two decades. However, few studies have considered gratitude in the palliative care context. Based on an exploratory study which found that gratitude was correlated with better quality of life and less psychological distress in palliative patients, we designed and piloted a gratitude intervention where palliative patients and a carer of their choice wrote and shared a gratitude letter with each other. The aims of this study are to establish the feasibility and acceptability of our gratitude intervention and provide a preliminary assessment of its effects. This pilot intervention study adopted a mixed-methods, concurrent nested, pre-post evaluation design. To assess the intervention's effects, we employed quantitative questionnaires on quality of life, quality of relationship, psychological distress, and subjective burden, as well as semi-structured interviews. To assess feasibility, we considered patients and carers' eligibility, participation and attrition rates, reasons for refusal to participate, appropriateness of intervention timeframe, modalities of participation, and barriers and facilitators. Acceptability was assessed through post-intervention satisfaction questionnaires. Thirty-nine participants completed the intervention and twenty-nine participated in interviews. We did not find any statistically significant pre/post intervention changes for patients, but found significant decrease in psychological distress for carers in terms of depression (median = 3 at T0, 1.5 at T1, p = .034) and total score (median = 13 at T0, 7.5 at T1, p = .041). Thematic analysis of interviews indicates that overall, the intervention had: (1) multiple positive outcomes for over a third of interviewees, in the form of positive emotional, cognitive, and relational effects; (2) single positive outcomes for nearly half of interviewees, who experienced emotional or cognitive effects; (3) no effect on two patients; and (4) negative emotional effects on two patients. Feasibility and acceptability indicators suggest that the intervention was well received by participants, and that it should adopt flexible modalities (e.g. writing or dictating a gratitude message) to ensure that it is feasible and adapted to individual needs and preferences. Larger scale deployment and evaluation of the gratitude intervention, including a control group, is warranted in order to have a more reliable evaluation of its effectiveness in palliative care.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Psychological research examining the nature and workings of gratitude has burgeoned over the past two decades. However, few studies have considered gratitude in the palliative care context. Based on an exploratory study which found that gratitude was correlated with better quality of life and less psychological distress in palliative patients, we designed and piloted a gratitude intervention where palliative patients and a carer of their choice wrote and shared a gratitude letter with each other. The aims of this study are to establish the feasibility and acceptability of our gratitude intervention and provide a preliminary assessment of its effects.
METHODS METHODS
This pilot intervention study adopted a mixed-methods, concurrent nested, pre-post evaluation design. To assess the intervention's effects, we employed quantitative questionnaires on quality of life, quality of relationship, psychological distress, and subjective burden, as well as semi-structured interviews. To assess feasibility, we considered patients and carers' eligibility, participation and attrition rates, reasons for refusal to participate, appropriateness of intervention timeframe, modalities of participation, and barriers and facilitators. Acceptability was assessed through post-intervention satisfaction questionnaires.
RESULTS RESULTS
Thirty-nine participants completed the intervention and twenty-nine participated in interviews. We did not find any statistically significant pre/post intervention changes for patients, but found significant decrease in psychological distress for carers in terms of depression (median = 3 at T0, 1.5 at T1, p = .034) and total score (median = 13 at T0, 7.5 at T1, p = .041). Thematic analysis of interviews indicates that overall, the intervention had: (1) multiple positive outcomes for over a third of interviewees, in the form of positive emotional, cognitive, and relational effects; (2) single positive outcomes for nearly half of interviewees, who experienced emotional or cognitive effects; (3) no effect on two patients; and (4) negative emotional effects on two patients. Feasibility and acceptability indicators suggest that the intervention was well received by participants, and that it should adopt flexible modalities (e.g. writing or dictating a gratitude message) to ensure that it is feasible and adapted to individual needs and preferences.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Larger scale deployment and evaluation of the gratitude intervention, including a control group, is warranted in order to have a more reliable evaluation of its effectiveness in palliative care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37101149
doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01172-x
pii: 10.1186/s12904-023-01172-x
pmc: PMC10134658
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

52

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Psychol Sci. 2018 Sep;29(9):1423-1435
pubmed: 29949445
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Nov;58(5):886-890.e5
pubmed: 31330287
Nurs Open. 2020 Sep 19;8(1):180-190
pubmed: 33318826
Emotion. 2011 Apr;11(2):391-402
pubmed: 21500907
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Sep 6;16(1):47
pubmed: 28874150
Cancer Nurs. 2007 Sep-Oct;30(5):405-11
pubmed: 17876187
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 12;10:1365
pubmed: 31249544
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Feb;43:156-160
pubmed: 34399147
Health Psychol. 2016 Dec;35(12):1320-1328
pubmed: 27513475
Emotion. 2012 Feb;12(1):163-8
pubmed: 21707160
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jan;82(1):112-27
pubmed: 11811629
J Fam Psychol. 2007 Dec;21(4):572-83
pubmed: 18179329
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Aug;12(8):753-62
pubmed: 21741309
Med Care. 2003 Jan;41(1):110-8
pubmed: 12544548
Psychol Assess. 2017 Aug;29(8):1028-1043
pubmed: 27736125
Stat Med. 1995 Sep 15;14(17):1933-40
pubmed: 8532986
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Oct;12(e4):e562-e569
pubmed: 31471493
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Jul 8;:
pubmed: 34244182
J Occup Health. 2021 Jan;63(1):e12290
pubmed: 34762326
Front Psychol. 2011 Oct 18;2:270
pubmed: 22028698
Psychother Res. 2018 Mar;28(2):192-202
pubmed: 27139595
Palliat Support Care. 2015 Jun;13(3):757-66
pubmed: 24905397
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Apr 20;30(12):1304-9
pubmed: 22370330
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
Palliat Support Care. 2022 Dec;20(6):846-853
pubmed: 35156606
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Feb;84(2):377-89
pubmed: 12585811
Palliat Med. 2006 Dec;20(8):755-67
pubmed: 17148530
Palliat Med. 2017 Feb;31(2):120-129
pubmed: 27412257
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Nov;30(7):890-905
pubmed: 20451313
J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12
pubmed: 15189396
J Couns Psychol. 2016 Jan;63(1):20-31
pubmed: 26575348
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Jul 6;:
pubmed: 32631960
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Mar;122(3):367-398
pubmed: 34591541
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Apr;21(4):445-453
pubmed: 26613417
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Sep 29;359(1449):1367-78
pubmed: 15347528
J Palliat Med. 2018 Nov;21(11):1566-1572
pubmed: 30044678
BMC Geriatr. 2014 Feb 20;14:23
pubmed: 24555474
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Jun;25(3):1057-73
pubmed: 26092476
Death Stud. 2017 Aug;41(7):436-446
pubmed: 28346066
J Psychosom Res. 2020 Aug;135:110165
pubmed: 32590219
BMJ. 1998 Apr 25;316(7140):1313-5
pubmed: 9554907
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2015;33(6):655-74
pubmed: 26315857
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Oct 24;15(1):88
pubmed: 27776501
Psychosomatics. 2001 May-Jun;42(3):241-6
pubmed: 11351113
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 1;33(7):749-54
pubmed: 25646186

Auteurs

Mathieu Bernard (M)

Palliative and Supportive Care Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Av. Pierre-Decker 5, Lausanne, CH-1011, Switzerland. mathieu.bernard@chuv.ch.

Emmanuelle Poncin (E)

Palliative and Supportive Care Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Av. Pierre-Decker 5, Lausanne, CH-1011, Switzerland.

Emilie Bovet (E)

Haute École de Santé Vaud (HESAV), Haute École Spécialisée de Suisse Occidentale (HES-SO), Lausanne, Switzerland.

Emmanuel Tamches (E)

Palliative and Supportive Care Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Av. Pierre-Decker 5, Lausanne, CH-1011, Switzerland.

Boris Cantin (B)

Palliative Care Center, Fribourg Hospital, Fribourg, Switzerland.

Josiane Pralong (J)

Rive Neuve Foundation, Blonay, Switzerland.

Gian Domenico Borasio (GD)

Palliative and Supportive Care Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Av. Pierre-Decker 5, Lausanne, CH-1011, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH