YouTube Is a Poor-Quality Source for Patient Information Regarding Patellar Dislocations.
Journal
Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation
ISSN: 2666-061X
Titre abrégé: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101765256
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
10
10
2022
accepted:
25
01
2023
medline:
27
4
2023
pubmed:
27
4
2023
entrez:
27
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate the content and quality of YouTube videos concerning patellar dislocations. "Patellar dislocation" and "kneecap dislocation" were searched on the YouTube library. The Uniform Resource Locator of the first 25 suggested videos was extracted, for a total of 50 videos. The following variables were collected for each video: number of views, duration in minutes, video source/uploader, content type, days since upload, view ratio (views/day), and number of likes. Video source/uploader was categorized as academic, physician, nonphysician, medical source, patient, commercial, and other. The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), Global Quality Scale (GQS), Patellar Dislocation Specific Score (PDSS), and DISCERN scores were used to assess each video. A series of linear regression models were used to explore relationships between each of these scores and the aforementioned variables. The median video length was 4.11 minutes (interquartile range 2.07-6.03, range 0.31-53.56), and the total number of views for all 50 videos was 3,697,587 views. The mean overall JAMA benchmark score ± standard deviation was 2.56 ± 0.64, GQS: 3.54 ± 1.05, total PDSS: 5.76 ± 3.42. Physicians were the most common video source/uploader (42%). Academic sources had the greatest mean JAMA benchmark score (3.20), whereas nonphysician and physician sources had the greatest mean GQS scores (4.09 and 3.95, respectively). Videos uploaded by physicians had the greatest PDSS scores (7.5). The overall transparency, reliability, and content quality of YouTube videos on patellar dislocation measured by the JAMA benchmark score and PDSS, respectively, are poor. Additionally, the overall educational and video quality, as assessed by the GQS, was intermediate. It is important to understand the quality of information patients receive on YouTube so providers can guide patients to greater-quality sources.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37101882
doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.01.014
pii: S2666-061X(23)00017-2
pmc: PMC10123404
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e459-e464Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors.
Références
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Nov 15;43(22):E1334-E1339
pubmed: 29664816
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Jun;38(6):1747-1751
pubmed: 30645752
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Mar;26(3):840-845
pubmed: 28314888
Iowa Orthop J. 2015;35:26-33
pubmed: 26361441
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2019 Nov 27;1(2):e109-e114
pubmed: 32266347
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jan;36(1):233-238
pubmed: 31864582
J Athl Train. 2013 Nov-Dec;48(6):810-7
pubmed: 24143905
Int Orthop. 2016 Oct;40(10):1995-2002
pubmed: 27029480
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Aug;15(4):669-675
pubmed: 34266929
Phys Sportsmed. 2022 Aug;50(4):289-294
pubmed: 34121601
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jun 29;9(6):23259671211016340
pubmed: 34262981
Eur Spine J. 2010 Oct;19(10):1776-9
pubmed: 20361342
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014 Mar;96(2):144-6
pubmed: 24780674
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 May;24(5):e135-40
pubmed: 25457189
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Jan - Feb;56(1):15-18
pubmed: 27989338
J Knee Surg. 2012 Mar;25(1):51-7
pubmed: 22624248
Australas Med J. 2012;5(12):633-8
pubmed: 23382767
Health Expect. 1998 Nov;1(2):135-136
pubmed: 11281868