Do Articular Surfaces of Dual Mobility Hips Have More Wear and Friction? An In Vitro Investigation.


Journal

The Journal of arthroplasty
ISSN: 1532-8406
Titre abrégé: J Arthroplasty
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8703515

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2023
Historique:
received: 05 12 2022
revised: 14 04 2023
accepted: 16 04 2023
medline: 9 6 2023
pubmed: 28 4 2023
entrez: 27 4 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Larger head-to-neck ratio of dual mobility (DM) hip arthroplasties provide greater range of motion/less risk of dislocation, but raise concerns for high wear and friction. We measured in vitro, the wear rates of contemporary DM hips with highly cross-linked ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHWMPE), where it came from, and their frictional torques. Hip simulators were used to compare the wear of DM to fixed-bearing (FB) designs of 2 different implants. Each of 8 different configurations underwent millions of simulated walking cycle tests, some as full DM, some as FB controls, some DM with the outer-articulation deliberately immobilized, and some the inner. Wear and 3-dimensional-frictional torques were measured and friction independent of size was deduced. The DM hips produced lower wear and friction-torque than the FB hips. The DM wear during walking gait comes mostly from the smaller inner articular surface. If the outer surface was immobilized, the wear and torque of the inner alone would be small, but the full DM (inner and outer free-to-move) wear and torque were smallest of all. Friction measurements expectedly showed larger hips having higher frictional torques, but the DM showed the lowest, again because its motion was mostly the smaller inner articulation; smaller than even a modern fixed-bearing hip. The DM hips appear to combine the benefits of greater range of motion and less impingement of larger hips, with the lower wear and friction of smaller FB hips, with some benefits compromised if the outer or inner articulations are immobilized.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Larger head-to-neck ratio of dual mobility (DM) hip arthroplasties provide greater range of motion/less risk of dislocation, but raise concerns for high wear and friction. We measured in vitro, the wear rates of contemporary DM hips with highly cross-linked ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHWMPE), where it came from, and their frictional torques.
METHODS
Hip simulators were used to compare the wear of DM to fixed-bearing (FB) designs of 2 different implants. Each of 8 different configurations underwent millions of simulated walking cycle tests, some as full DM, some as FB controls, some DM with the outer-articulation deliberately immobilized, and some the inner. Wear and 3-dimensional-frictional torques were measured and friction independent of size was deduced.
RESULTS
The DM hips produced lower wear and friction-torque than the FB hips. The DM wear during walking gait comes mostly from the smaller inner articular surface. If the outer surface was immobilized, the wear and torque of the inner alone would be small, but the full DM (inner and outer free-to-move) wear and torque were smallest of all. Friction measurements expectedly showed larger hips having higher frictional torques, but the DM showed the lowest, again because its motion was mostly the smaller inner articulation; smaller than even a modern fixed-bearing hip.
CONCLUSION
The DM hips appear to combine the benefits of greater range of motion and less impingement of larger hips, with the lower wear and friction of smaller FB hips, with some benefits compromised if the outer or inner articulations are immobilized.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37105329
pii: S0883-5403(23)00390-X
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.034
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

S265-S273

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Hani Haider (H)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.

Joel Weisenburger (J)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.

Ryan Siskey (R)

Exponent: Engineering and Scientific Consulting, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Christopher Deans (C)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.

Curtis Hartman (C)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.

Beau Kildow (B)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.

Beau Konigsberg (B)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.

Kevin Garvin (K)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH