Retention of Zirconia Crowns Compared to Stainless Steel Crowns: An Ex-Vivo Study.
Journal
Pediatric dentistry
ISSN: 1942-5473
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Dent
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7909102
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Mar 2023
15 Mar 2023
Historique:
medline:
1
5
2023
pubmed:
28
4
2023
entrez:
28
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to compare the retention of 3M stainless steel crowns A total of 45 extracted primary mandibular second molars were allocated randomly to either of the three groups. All teeth were mounted in Dentsply acrylic molds and then prepared for crown cementation. Crowns were cemented with glass ionomer cement (GIC). Retention testing was performed using Instron 5566A. Differences in retention between the groups were tested via Welch's analysis of variance (ANOVA), and post hoc comparisons were performed with the Games-Howell test. Welch's ANOVA resulted in statistically significant differences between the three groups (P<0.001). The mean±SD force in Newtons (N) for the SSC group, Kinder Krowns Within the limitations of this ex-vivo study results, due to their statistically significant higher retention, stainless steel crowns should be selected over zirconia crowns when in need of a full coverage restoration. But if esthetics are a concern, dentists can choose freely between either of the ZCs tested in this study.
Substances chimiques
Glass Ionomer Cements
0
Stainless Steel
12597-68-1
Zirconium
C6V6S92N3C
zirconium oxide
S38N85C5G0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM