The Fibre Requirements of Horses and the Consequences and Causes of Failure to Meet Them.
behaviour
fibre
gastric ulcers
hindgut
microbiome
nutrition
welfare
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Apr 2023
20 Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
22
02
2023
revised:
27
03
2023
accepted:
31
03
2023
medline:
28
4
2023
pubmed:
28
4
2023
entrez:
28
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Failure to meet the minimum forage requirement of 1.5% of the horse's bodyweight and the opportunity for foraging for a minimum of 8 h a day (not going without this opportunity longer than four to five consecutive hours) can have both physiological and behavioural consequences. To provide an energy source for horses, rations often include starch rather than fibre. This can result in health issues related to the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) in the horse. In the stomach, the main concern is equine gastric ulcer syndrome (EGUS) and, more specifically, equine squamous gastric disease (ESGD). Ulcerations are caused either by increasing acidity in the stomach (from starch ingestion and reduced saliva production) or splashing of acidic juices caused by a lack of a forage barrier prior to exercise or prolonged periods without fibrous feed intake, which allows the stomach to collapse and spread acidic gastric fluids into the upper squamous regions of the stomach. In the hindgut, starch that has escaped digestion in the small intestine causes microbial instability and increased production of volatile fatty acids (VFA) and lactic acid. This puts horses at great risk for acidosis and subsequent laminitis. Shifts in the hindgut microbiota will also affect a horse's behaviour via the gut-brain axis, as well as potentially compromise immune function. Reduced fluid intake caused by reduced saliva production can result in colic. Choosing a fibrous alternative for starch in a high-energy diet greatly reduces the risk of EGUS and acidosis and improves digestion, GIT pH, body condition, behaviour, immune functions, and performance. Providing hay can reduce crib-biting, wood-chewing, coprophagia, the consumption of bedding, aggression, and stress, and subsequently increase social bonding and affiliation with conspecifics. Adequate fibre intake is related to reduced clinical signs of EGUS, reduced reactivity, and better adaptation to weaning. Lignophagia (wood chewing) has also been observed in horses that are foraging, and this is thought to reflect low fibre content in the available forage (for example, early vegetative, lush pasture).
Identifiants
pubmed: 37106977
pii: ani13081414
doi: 10.3390/ani13081414
pmc: PMC10135103
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Références
Vet J. 2009 Sep;181(3):251-5
pubmed: 18511313
J Nutr. 2006 Jul;136(7 Suppl):2099S-2102S
pubmed: 16772510
Equine Vet J. 1987 May;19(3):192-4
pubmed: 3608954
Acta Vet Scand. 2018 Apr 13;60(1):24
pubmed: 29653546
J Anim Sci. 1995 Oct;73(10):2922-30
pubmed: 8617662
J Anim Sci. 1977 Jul;45(1):87-93
pubmed: 18431
J Nutr. 1997 May;127(5 Suppl):814S-818S
pubmed: 9164243
J Vet Intern Med. 2018 Sep;32(5):1754-1762
pubmed: 30222207
J Equine Vet Sci. 2022 Jun;113:103940
pubmed: 35341909
BMC Vet Res. 2022 May 19;18(1):187
pubmed: 35590319
Animal. 2017 Jul;11(7):1146-1152
pubmed: 27927263
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2022 Mar;106(2):313-326
pubmed: 34553422
Res Vet Sci. 2008 Dec;85(3):476-80
pubmed: 18423503
Aust Vet J. 2006 Nov;84(11):402-7
pubmed: 17092327
Animals (Basel). 2021 Aug 08;11(8):
pubmed: 34438794
Equine Vet J. 2006 May;38(3):209-13
pubmed: 16706273
Equine Vet J Suppl. 1999 Apr;(28):20-5
pubmed: 11314230
J Equine Vet Sci. 2019 May;76:1-5
pubmed: 31084747
Am J Vet Res. 2002 Nov;63(11):1481-7
pubmed: 12428654
Vet J. 2021 May;271:105654
pubmed: 33840486
Vet J. 2004 Jan;167(1):33-7
pubmed: 14623148
Animal. 2017 Jun;11(6):958-967
pubmed: 27881201
Animal. 2012 Dec;6(12):1939-46
pubmed: 22717208
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1999 Oct 15;215(8):1130-3
pubmed: 10530328
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 6;18(1):e0280078
pubmed: 36607910
Equine Vet J Suppl. 1989 Jun;(7):68-72
pubmed: 9118110
N Z Vet J. 2007 Dec;55(6):337-41
pubmed: 18059653
Vet Rec. 2020 Oct 17;187(8):e60
pubmed: 32366497
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 6;17(7):e0269629
pubmed: 35793289
J Equine Vet Sci. 2020 Jan;84:102853
pubmed: 31864460
Equine Vet J. 1987 Sep;19(5):454-7
pubmed: 3678189
Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2003 Dec;19(3):575-97
pubmed: 14740758
J Vet Intern Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;29(5):1288-99
pubmed: 26340142
Equine Vet J. 1995 Mar;27(2):86-91
pubmed: 7607155
Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 14;10(10):
pubmed: 33066335
Equine Vet J Suppl. 2006 Aug;(36):596-605
pubmed: 17402490
Animal. 2009 Sep;3(9):1308-12
pubmed: 22444907
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2007;10(4):309-29
pubmed: 17970632
Animal. 2013 May;7(5):746-53
pubmed: 23228709
Aust Vet J. 1986 Jul;63(7):234-5
pubmed: 3778377
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jul 06;12(14):
pubmed: 35883287
Am J Vet Res. 2003 Apr;64(4):404-12
pubmed: 12693528
PLoS One. 2010 Aug 26;5(8):e12434
pubmed: 20865160
Vet Rec. 2002 Nov 30;151(22):658-62
pubmed: 12498408
Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2021 Apr;37(1):43-61
pubmed: 33820609
Equine Vet J. 2009 Sep;41(7):625-30
pubmed: 19927579
Animals (Basel). 2018 Mar 18;8(3):
pubmed: 29562654
Aust Vet J. 2017 Oct;95(10):370-374
pubmed: 28948628
Anim Microbiome. 2019 Nov 13;1(1):14
pubmed: 33499951
Equine Vet J Suppl. 1999 Apr;(29):30-3
pubmed: 10696290
Physiol Behav. 2010 Dec 2;101(5):623-7
pubmed: 20869976
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005 Jul 1;248(1):75-81
pubmed: 15953698