Content and Face Validity of the Evaluation Tool of Health Information for Consumers (ETHIC): Getting Health Information Accessible to Patients and Citizens.
education materials
health information
health literacy
patient education
quality information assessment
validation study
Journal
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2227-9032
Titre abrégé: Healthcare (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666525
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Apr 2023
17 Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
31
01
2023
revised:
15
03
2023
accepted:
17
03
2023
medline:
28
4
2023
pubmed:
28
4
2023
entrez:
28
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Health information concerns both individuals' engagement and the way services and professionals provide information to facilitate consumers' health decision making. Citizens' and patients' participation in the management of their own health is related to the availability of tools making health information accessible, thus promoting empowerment and making care more inclusive and fairer. A novel instrument was developed (Evaluation Tool of Health Information for Consumers-ETHIC) for assessing the formal quality of health information materials written in Italian language. This study reports ETHIC's content and face validity. A convenience sample of 11 experts and 5 potential users was involved. The former were requested to evaluate relevance and exhaustiveness, the latter both readability and understandability of ETHIC. The Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated for ETHIC's sections and items; experts and potential users' feedback were analyzed by the authors. All sections and most items were evaluated as relevant. A new item was introduced. Potential users provided the researchers with comments that partly confirmed ETHIC's clarity and understandability. Our findings strongly support the relevance of ETHIC's sections and items. An updated version of the instrument matching exhaustivity, readability, and understandability criteria was obtained, which will be assessed for further steps of the validation process.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Health information concerns both individuals' engagement and the way services and professionals provide information to facilitate consumers' health decision making. Citizens' and patients' participation in the management of their own health is related to the availability of tools making health information accessible, thus promoting empowerment and making care more inclusive and fairer. A novel instrument was developed (Evaluation Tool of Health Information for Consumers-ETHIC) for assessing the formal quality of health information materials written in Italian language. This study reports ETHIC's content and face validity.
METHODS
METHODS
A convenience sample of 11 experts and 5 potential users was involved. The former were requested to evaluate relevance and exhaustiveness, the latter both readability and understandability of ETHIC. The Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated for ETHIC's sections and items; experts and potential users' feedback were analyzed by the authors.
RESULTS
RESULTS
All sections and most items were evaluated as relevant. A new item was introduced. Potential users provided the researchers with comments that partly confirmed ETHIC's clarity and understandability.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings strongly support the relevance of ETHIC's sections and items. An updated version of the instrument matching exhaustivity, readability, and understandability criteria was obtained, which will be assessed for further steps of the validation process.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37107988
pii: healthcare11081154
doi: 10.3390/healthcare11081154
pmc: PMC10137649
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Italian Ministry of Health
ID : RF-2016-02364211
Références
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):357-67
pubmed: 23381529
Am J Community Psychol. 2012 Mar;49(1-2):1-21
pubmed: 21643926
Cancer Control. 2009 Jan;16(1):70-8
pubmed: 19078933
Health Expect. 2004 Jun;7(2):165-75
pubmed: 15117391
Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2005 Oct;66:53-60
pubmed: 16214724
J Health Psychol. 2013 Aug;18(8):1004-10
pubmed: 23349399
Ann Pharmacother. 2007 Jun;41(6):951-6
pubmed: 17488832
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Dec;25(6):1053-8
pubmed: 25843827
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Oct;65(10):2229-38
pubmed: 19686403
JAMA. 2015 Sep 22-29;314(12):1225-6
pubmed: 26247161
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):97-107
pubmed: 21768583
Res Nurs Health. 2007 Aug;30(4):459-67
pubmed: 17654487
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Dec;67(12):2072-8
pubmed: 18952344
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Feb;53(2):105-11
pubmed: 10396471
J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 3:203-21
pubmed: 23030571
Health Info Libr J. 2009 Dec;26(4):260-78
pubmed: 19930474
Nurs Res. 1986 Nov-Dec;35(6):382-5
pubmed: 3640358
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):395-403
pubmed: 24973195
Health Promot Pract. 2014 Sep;15(5):629-37
pubmed: 24951489
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 25;12:80
pubmed: 22276600