Timing of Antithrombotic Secondary Prevention in Patients with Intracranial Hemorrhage after Stroke Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy.
anticoagulants
aspirin
cerebral hemorrhage
hemorrhagic infarction
ischemic stroke
secondary prevention
thrombectomy
thrombolysis
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Apr 2023
07 Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
26
01
2023
revised:
03
04
2023
accepted:
06
04
2023
medline:
28
4
2023
pubmed:
28
4
2023
entrez:
28
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In patients with acute ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic transformation (HT) of infarcted tissue frequently occurs after reperfusion treatment. We aimed to assess whether HT and its severity influences the start of secondary prevention therapy and increases the risk of stroke recurrence. In this retrospective dual-center study, we recruited ischemic stroke patients treated with thrombolysis, thrombectomy or both. Our primary outcome was the time between revascularization and the start of any secondary prevention therapy. The secondary outcome was ischemic stroke recurrence within three months. We compared patients with vs. without HT and no (n = 653), minor (n = 158) and major (n = 51) HT patients using propensity score matching. The delay in the start of antithrombotics or anticoagulants was median 24 h in no HT, 26 h in minor HT and 39 h in major HT. No and minor HT patients had similar rates of any stroke recurrence (3.4% (all ischemic) vs. 2.5% (1.6% ischemic plus 0.9% hemorrhagic)). Major HT patients had a higher stroke recurrence at 7.8% (3.9% ischemic, 3.9% hemorrhagic), but this difference did not reach significance. A total of 22% of major HT patients did not start any antithrombotic treatment during the three-month follow-up. In conclusion, the presence of HT influences the timing of secondary prevention in ischemic stroke patients undergoing reperfusion treatments. Minor HT did not delay the start of antithrombotics or anticoagulants compared to no HT, with no significant difference in safety outcomes. Major HT patients remain a clinical challenge with both a delayed or lacking start of treatment. In this group, we did not see a higher rate of ischemic recurrence; however, this may have been censored by elevated early mortality. While not reaching statistical significance, hemorrhagic recurrence was somewhat more common in this group, warranting further study using larger datasets.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37109108
pii: jcm12082771
doi: 10.3390/jcm12082771
pmc: PMC10145350
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Nov 17;:
pubmed: 36396434
Neurosurgery. 2006 Jul;59(1):21-7; discussion 21-7
pubmed: 16823296
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Nov 20;7(22):e010133
pubmed: 30571487
Stroke. 1999 Nov;30(11):2280-4
pubmed: 10548658
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Feb 1;:
pubmed: 36725360
Stroke. 2014 Jun;45(6):1657-63
pubmed: 24788971
J Neurol. 2014 May;261(5):905-12
pubmed: 24590407
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 May;21 Suppl 2:69-80
pubmed: 22552982
Stroke. 2001 Jun;32(6):1330-5
pubmed: 11387495
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3083-107
pubmed: 19757444
Lancet. 2007 Jan 27;369(9558):275-82
pubmed: 17258667
Neurology. 2011 Jul 26;77(4):341-8
pubmed: 21715707
Stroke. 2015 Oct;46(10):2981-6
pubmed: 26330447
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e89798
pubmed: 24587041
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;43(5-6):294-304
pubmed: 28343220