Yield and Rhizosphere Soil Environment of Greenhouse Zucchini in Response to Different Planting and Breeding Waste Composts.

compost planting and breeding waste soil environment zucchini

Journal

Microorganisms
ISSN: 2076-2607
Titre abrégé: Microorganisms
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101625893

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Apr 2023
Historique:
received: 16 03 2023
revised: 06 04 2023
accepted: 12 04 2023
medline: 28 4 2023
pubmed: 28 4 2023
entrez: 28 4 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Composting, planting, and breeding waste for return to the field is the most crucial soil improvement method under the resource utilization of agricultural waste. However, how the vegetable yield and rhizosphere soil environment respond to different composts is still unknown. Therefore, eight formulations were designed for compost fermentation using agricultural waste [sheep manure (SM), tail vegetable (TV), cow manure (CM), mushroom residue (MR), and corn straw (CS)] without fertilizer (CK1) and local commercial organic fertilizer (CK2) as controls to study the yield and rhizosphere soil environment of greenhouse zucchini in response to different planting and breeding waste compost. Applying planting and breeding waste compost significantly increased the soil's organic matter and nutrient content. It inhibited soil acidification, which T4 (SM:TV:CS = 6:3:1) and T7 (SM:TV:MR:CS = 6:2:1:1) treatments affected significantly. Compared to CK2 treatment, T4 and T7 treatments showed a greater increase, with a significant increase of 14.69% and 11.01%, respectively. Therefore, T4, T7, and two control treatments were selected for high-throughput sequencing based on yield performance. Compared with the CK1 treatment, although multiple applications of chemical fertilizers led to a decrease in bacterial and fungal richness, planting and breeding waste compost maintained bacterial diversity and enhanced fungal diversity. Compared to CK2, the relative abundance increased in T7-treated

Identifiants

pubmed: 37110447
pii: microorganisms11041026
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11041026
pmc: PMC10143665
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Jihua Yu
ID : GSSYLXM-02
Organisme : Jihua Yu
ID : CARS-23-C-07
Organisme : Jihua Yu
ID : GSLK-2021-6
Organisme : Jihua Yu
ID : GSBJLJ-2021-14

Références

BMC Genomics. 2017 Feb 10;18(1):145
pubmed: 28183269
Syst Biol. 2009 Apr;58(2):224-39
pubmed: 20525580
Front Microbiol. 2022 Apr 21;13:863325
pubmed: 35531292
Bioresour Technol. 2004 May;93(1):21-8
pubmed: 14987716
J Hazard Mater. 2010 Sep 15;181(1-3):298-304
pubmed: 20594987
Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 1;27(21):2957-63
pubmed: 21903629
Environ Int. 2017 Oct;107:111-130
pubmed: 28719840
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40863
pubmed: 22808280
Microbiome. 2018 Jan 16;6(1):14
pubmed: 29338764
Ecol Lett. 2014 Sep;17(9):1086-93
pubmed: 24912000
Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 15;27(16):2194-200
pubmed: 21700674
J Hazard Mater. 2017 Feb 15;324(Pt B):516-525
pubmed: 27856050
Bioinformatics. 2015 Sep 1;31(17):2882-4
pubmed: 25957349
Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jul;10(7):1844-9
pubmed: 18363712
Nat Methods. 2013 Oct;10(10):996-8
pubmed: 23955772
New Phytol. 2015 Sep;207(4):1145-58
pubmed: 25952659
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D259-D264
pubmed: 30371820
Front Immunol. 2017 Mar 29;8:354
pubmed: 28424690
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 20;8(11):e79699
pubmed: 24278158
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7
pubmed: 17586664
Bioinformatics. 2018 Sep 1;34(17):i884-i890
pubmed: 30423086
Mol Ecol. 2019 Sep;28(18):4259-4271
pubmed: 31446647
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Feb 25;705:136003
pubmed: 31846813
Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Nov;32(11):3030-2
pubmed: 26248563
Environ Microbiol. 2017 Sep;19(9):3465-3474
pubmed: 28618189
Physiol Plant. 2009 Aug;136(4):426-36
pubmed: 19470091
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 8;8(1):16554
pubmed: 30410029
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(21):7188-96
pubmed: 17947321
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Sep 30;12:385
pubmed: 21961884
AMB Express. 2020 Jan 18;10(1):15
pubmed: 31955267
Science. 2016 Sep 16;353(6305):1272-7
pubmed: 27634532
Environ Pollut. 2020 Dec;267:115662
pubmed: 33254731
Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6
pubmed: 20383131
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 23;16(9):e0257432
pubmed: 34555071
ISME J. 2013 Feb;7(2):299-311
pubmed: 22955232

Auteurs

Jianzhong Tie (J)

College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.

Yali Qiao (Y)

College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.

Ning Jin (N)

College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.

Xueqin Gao (X)

College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.

Yayu Liu (Y)

College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.

Jian Lyu (J)

College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.
Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.

Guobin Zhang (G)

College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.
Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.

Linli Hu (L)

College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.
Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.

Jihua Yu (J)

College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.
Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.

Classifications MeSH