Experiences of women who have planned unassisted home births in high-resource countries: a qualitative systematic review.
Journal
JBI evidence synthesis
ISSN: 2689-8381
Titre abrégé: JBI Evid Synth
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101764819
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 09 2023
01 09 2023
Historique:
medline:
11
9
2023
pubmed:
28
4
2023
entrez:
28
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this review was to identify, appraise, and synthesize the qualitative evidence about the experiences of women in high-resource countries who have planned unassisted home births. Unassisted birth occurs when a woman chooses to give birth without the assistance of health care providers. These births are planned and usually occur in a woman's home. It is difficult to know the prevalence of unassisted birth because it occurs at the margins of health care systems, making data difficult to collect. Based on its lack of visibility in society, we assume that unassisted birth is not a common birth choice. Women who choose planned unassisted birth may face stigma for their decision and their experience of birth, which challenge accepted norms. Synthesizing qualitative evidence about women's experiences of planned unassisted birth can improve our understanding about women's birthing values and provide important clues about aspects of birthing care that may be missing in mainstream birthing services. Studies that explored the experiences of women who had planned unassisted home births without the support of health care providers in high-resource countries were included. Unassisted home births were defined as those that were planned not to be assisted by health care professionals. Study designs that focused on qualitative data were eligible for inclusion. MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, CINAHL (EBSCO), Scopus, Web of Science, Sociological Abstracts (ProQuest), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest), and Nursing and Allied Health Database (ProQuest) were searched in 2022. Studies published in English since the databases' inception were considered for inclusion. A search of relevant websites for unpublished and gray literature was also undertaken in 2022. Two independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality of papers identified for inclusion. Qualitative research findings were extracted from papers that met the inclusion criteria and critical appraisal standard. Findings were extracted and categorized based on similarity of meaning. The categories were synthesized to create 2 synthesized findings, and the ConQul approach was used to grade the findings to establish confidence in the synthesized findings. Six studies were included in the review. All the studies used interviews for data collection; other methods included surveys, email correspondence, posts on internet discussion boards and forums, and websites. The total sample size for interviews was 103 participants. Total survey sample size for surveys was 87 participants. Total sample size for email correspondence was 5. Internet data sources included more than 100,000 individual and forum posts and 127 birth stories. A total of 17 findings were extracted and grouped into 4 categories. The 4 categories were then synthesized into 2 synthesized findings: i) navigating tensions within self, and between self and systems, and ii) integrating and transcending physical experiences of birth. More research is needed to better understand the experiences of women who have planned unassisted births. Improving understanding and increasing the awareness of planned unassisted birth are necessary steps for promoting inclusive, relational, and person-centered birthing experiences for everyone. Reflection about the differences between planned unassisted births and mainstream births may support needed reorientations of perinatal services. PROSPERO CRD42019125242. A French-language version of the abstract of this review is available [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A9 ].
Identifiants
pubmed: 37114867
doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00246
pii: 02174543-202309000-00003
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1732-1763Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 JBI.
Références
Mckelvin G, Thomson G, Downe S. The childbirth experience: a systematic review of predictors and outcomes. Women Birth 2021;34(5):407–416.
Downe S, Finlayson K, Oladapo O, Bonet M, Gülmezoglu AM. What matters to women during childbirth: a systematic qualitative review. PLoS One 2018;13(4):e0194906.
Bell AF, Andersson E. The birth experience and women’s postnatal depression: a systematic review. Midwifery 2016;39:112–123.
Hildingsson I, Johansson M, Karlström A, Fenwick J. Factors associated with a positive birth experience: an exploration of Swedish women’s experiences. Int J Childbirth 2013;3:153–164.
Joyce S. Wait and transfer, curate and prosume: women’s social experiences of birth spaces architecture. Women Birth 2021;34(6):540–553.
Borrelli SE, Walsh D, Spiby H. First-time mothers’ choice of birthplace: influencing factors, expectations of the midwife’s role and perceived safety. J Adv Nurs 2017;73(8):1937–1946.
Bernhard C, Zielinski R, Ackerson K, English J. Home birth after hospital birth: women’s choices and reflections. J Midwifery Women Health 2014;59(2):160–166.
Altman MR, Eagen‐Torkko MK, Mohammed SA, Kantrowitz‐Gordon I, Khosa RM, Gavin AR. The impact of COVID‐19 visitor policy restrictions on birthing communities of colour. J Adv Nurs 2021;77(12):4827–4835.
Jackson MK, Schmied V, Dahlen HG. Birthing outside the system: the motivation behind the choice to freebirth or have a homebirth with risk factors in Australia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020;20(1):254.
Shanley LK. Unassisted childbirth, 3rd ed. Self-published, CreateSpace; 2016.
Feeley C, Burns E, Adams E, Thomson G. Why do some women choose to freebirth? A meta-thematic synthesis, part one. Evid Based. Midwifery 2015;13:4–9.
Plested M, Kirkham M. Risk and fear in the lived experience of birth without a midwife. Midwifery 2016;38:29–34.
Lindgren HE, Nässén K, Lundgren I. Taking the matter into one’s own hands – women’s experiences of unassisted homebirths in Sweden. Sex Reprod Healthc 2017;11:31–35.
Feeley C, Thomson G, Downe S. Caring for women making unconventional birth choices: a meta-ethnography exploring the views, attitudes, and experiences of midwives. Midwifery 2019;72:50–59.
Miller AC. On the margins of the periphery: unassisted childbirth and the management of layered stigma. Sociol Spectr 2012;32(5):406–423.
McCourt C, Cartwright M. A review of facilitators and barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practices in labour and childbirth in obstetric settings [internet]. PROSPERO; 2017 [cited 2018 Aug 21]. Available from: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017081891 .
Scarf VL, Rossiter C, Vedam S, Dahlen HG, Ellwood D, Forster D, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth among women with low-risk pregnancies in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Midwifery 2018;62:240–255.
Shneerson C, Taylor B, Kenyon S. A systematic review to examine the evidence regarding discussions by midwives, with women, around their options for where to give birth [internet]. PROSPERO; 2015 [cited 2018 Aug 21]. Available from: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42015017334 .
Steel A, Wardle J, Lauche R, James P. Women decision making process with regards homebirth: a systematic review [internet]. PROSPERO; 2018 [cited 2018 Aug 21]. Available from: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018088102 .
Yuill C. Exploring informed decision-making during pregnancy and in birth: a meta-synthesis of women’s experiences [internet]. PROSPERO; 2017 [cited 2018 Aug 21]. Available from: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017053264 .
Solarz MW. North–south, commemorating the first Brandt Report: searching for the contemporary spatial picture of the global rift. Third World Q 2012;33(3):559–569.
Solarz MW. The birth and development of the language of global development in light of trends in global population, international politics, economics and globalisation. Third World Q 2017;38(8):1753–1766.
Lockwood C, Porritt K, Munn Z, Rittenmeyer L, Salmond S, Bjerrum M, et al. Aromataris E, Munn Z. Chapter 2: Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis [internet]. JBI; 2020 [cited 2022 Jun 7]. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global .
Macdonald D, Etowa J, Helwig M. Experiences of women who have planned unassisted home births: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2019;17(1):16–21.
Falk-Smith N. Human childbirth: an obstetrical dilemma or a solo act? Am J Phys Anthropol 2013;150(S56):121.
Munn Z, Aromataris E, Tufanaru C, Stern C, Porritt K, Farrow J, et al. The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI). Int J Evid Based Healthc 2019;17(1):36–43.
Munn Z, Porritt K, Lockwood C, Aromataris E, Pearson A. Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014;14:108.
Page MJ, McKenzie Je, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71.
OBoyle C. Deliberately unassisted birth in Ireland: understanding choice in Irish maternity services. Br J Midwifery 2016;24(3):181–187.
Brown LA. Birth visionaries: an examination of unassisted childbirth [thesis]. Boston (MA): Boston College; 2009.
Freeze RAS. Born free: unassisted childbirth in North America. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing; 2008.
Lundgren I. Women’s experiences of giving birth and making decisions whether to give birth at home when professional care at home is not an option in public health care. Sex Reprod Healthc 2010;1(2):61–66.
McKenzie G, Montgomery E. Undisturbed physiological birth: insights from women who freebirth in the United Kingdom. Midwifery 2021;101:103042.
Miller AC. “Midwife to myself”: birth narratives among women choosing unassisted homebirth. Sociol Inquiry 2009;79(1):51–74.
Crowther S. Crowther S, Hall J Childbirth as a sacred celebration. Spirituality and childbirth: meaning and care at the start of life. Routledge; 2018.
Jenkinson B, Kruske S, Kildea S. The experiences of women, midwives and obstetricians when women decline recommended maternity care: a feminist thematic analysis. Midwifery 2017;52:1–10.
Jenkinson B, Kruske S, Kildea S. Refusal of recommended maternity care: time to make a pact with women? Women Birth 2018;31(6):433–441.
Catling-Paull C, Dahlen H, Homer CS. Multiparous women’s confidence to have a publicly-funded homebirth: a qualitative study. Women Birth 2011;24(3):122–128.
Crowther S, Smythe E, Spence D. Kairos time at the moment of birth. Midwifery 2015;31(4):451–457.
Crowther S, Hall J. Spirituality and spiritual care in and around childbirth. Women Birth 2015;28(2):173–178.
JBI. JBI Grades of recommendation [internet]. JBI; 2014 [cited 2022 Jun 7]. Available from: https://jbi.global/sites/default/files/2019-05/JBI-grades-of-recommendation_2014.pdf .