The Feasibility and Safety of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Definitive Chemoradiation in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Single-Arm Phase II Clinical Trial.
definitive chemoradiation
induction chemotherapy
locally advanced cervical cancer
Journal
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
ISSN: 2476-762X
Titre abrégé: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev
Pays: Thailand
ID NLM: 101130625
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Apr 2023
01 Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
17
12
2022
medline:
1
5
2023
pubmed:
28
4
2023
entrez:
28
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The present study aimed at investigating the feasibility and safety of induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. In this single-arm clinical trial, patients with cervical cancer (stages IB3-IVA) received a median four cycles of induction chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin, every three weeks) followed by dCRT (which consisted of the whole pelvis at the dose of 45-50 Gy along with weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m2) followed by intracavitary brachytherapy at the total dose of 80-90 Gy). Primary end point was local control at three months, which was assessed by gynecologic examination and pelvic MRI. The secondary outcome of the study was treatment-related toxicity. Seventy-four patients with the mean age of 51.6 ± 9.5 years were included. The most frequent (51.4%) disease stage was IIB. Complete and partial clinical responses were observed in 60.8% and 14.9% of patients, respectively. The frequency of progressive disease and stable disease were 14.9% and 9.5%, respectively. Grade II and III neutropenia (during neoadjuvant chemotherapy were 13.5% and 2.7%, respectively; these figures during chemoradiation were 29.7% and 13.5%, respectively. A treatment interruption was observed for 60.8% (45 cases) of patients during chemoradiation and 31.1% during induction chemotherapy. Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation is feasible in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer; however, the toxicity should be managed properly to avoid delayed e treatment. More than three quarters of the patients achieved complete or partial clinical response within a three-month follow-up.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The present study aimed at investigating the feasibility and safety of induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
In this single-arm clinical trial, patients with cervical cancer (stages IB3-IVA) received a median four cycles of induction chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin, every three weeks) followed by dCRT (which consisted of the whole pelvis at the dose of 45-50 Gy along with weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m2) followed by intracavitary brachytherapy at the total dose of 80-90 Gy). Primary end point was local control at three months, which was assessed by gynecologic examination and pelvic MRI. The secondary outcome of the study was treatment-related toxicity.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Seventy-four patients with the mean age of 51.6 ± 9.5 years were included. The most frequent (51.4%) disease stage was IIB. Complete and partial clinical responses were observed in 60.8% and 14.9% of patients, respectively. The frequency of progressive disease and stable disease were 14.9% and 9.5%, respectively. Grade II and III neutropenia (during neoadjuvant chemotherapy were 13.5% and 2.7%, respectively; these figures during chemoradiation were 29.7% and 13.5%, respectively. A treatment interruption was observed for 60.8% (45 cases) of patients during chemoradiation and 31.1% during induction chemotherapy.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation is feasible in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer; however, the toxicity should be managed properly to avoid delayed e treatment. More than three quarters of the patients achieved complete or partial clinical response within a three-month follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37116155
doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.4.1321
pmc: PMC10352727
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cisplatin
Q20Q21Q62J
Paclitaxel
P88XT4IS4D
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1321-1330Références
N Engl J Med. 1999 Apr 15;340(15):1144-53
pubmed: 10202165
J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 1;29(13):1678-85
pubmed: 21444871
Ann Oncol. 2002 Aug;13(8):1212-9
pubmed: 12181244
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90
pubmed: 21296855
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 20;37(33):3124-3131
pubmed: 31449470
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Oct 1;102(2):362-372
pubmed: 29920324
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Nov;147(2):334-339
pubmed: 28935271
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Nov;127(2):303-6
pubmed: 22902917
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv72-iv83
pubmed: 28881916
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2016 Dec 23;19:50-52
pubmed: 28116341
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2022 Jun;28(4):827-835
pubmed: 33861657
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 Mar;32(3):436-445
pubmed: 35256434
Br J Cancer. 2013 Jun 25;108(12):2464-9
pubmed: 23695016
J Clin Oncol. 1999 May;17(5):1339-48
pubmed: 10334517
Eur J Cancer. 2003 Nov;39(17):2470-86
pubmed: 14602133
J Cancer Res Ther. 2019 Oct-Dec;15(6):1359-1364
pubmed: 31898673
Phytother Res. 2021 Sep;35(9):5143-5153
pubmed: 34164855
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2017 Nov;1:1-15
pubmed: 30657372
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Apr;18(8):1606-13
pubmed: 10764420
N Engl J Med. 1999 Apr 15;340(15):1154-61
pubmed: 10202166
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Sep;146(3):560-565
pubmed: 28709705
N Engl J Med. 1999 Apr 15;340(15):1137-43
pubmed: 10202164
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Apr;129(1):124-8
pubmed: 23353129
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Nov 03;13:8307-8316
pubmed: 34764693
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Oct;66(5):385-90
pubmed: 27486286