Impact of small boat sound on the listening space of Pempheris adspersa, Forsterygion lapillum, Alpheus richardsoni and Ovalipes catharus.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 04 2023
28 04 2023
Historique:
received:
06
10
2022
accepted:
17
04
2023
medline:
1
5
2023
pubmed:
29
4
2023
entrez:
28
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Anthropogenic stressors, such as plastics and fishing, are putting coastal habitats under immense pressure. However, sound pollution from small boats has received little attention given the importance of sound in the various life history strategies of many marine animals. By combining passive acoustic monitoring, propagation modelling, and hearing threshold data, the impact of small-boat sound on the listening spaces of four coastal species was determined. Listening space reductions (LSR) were greater for fishes compared to crustaceans, for which LSR varied by day and night, due to their greater hearing abilities. Listening space also varied by sound modality for the two fish species, highlighting the importance of considering both sound pressure and particle motion. The theoretical results demonstrate that boat sound hinders the ability of fishes to perceive acoustic cues, advocating for future field-based research on acoustic cues, and highlighting the need for effective mitigation and management of small-boat sound within coastal areas worldwide.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37117196
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33684-0
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-33684-0
pmc: PMC10147705
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7007Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 11;6:19098
pubmed: 26750559
Mar Pollut Bull. 2018 Oct;135:290-302
pubmed: 30301040
Ecol Evol. 2018 Jun 13;8(13):6438-6448
pubmed: 30038746
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37965
pubmed: 22655089
Sci Rep. 2020 May 21;10(1):7943
pubmed: 32439882
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Feb;22(2):513-29
pubmed: 26242490
Mar Environ Res. 2021 Dec;172:105489
pubmed: 34619503
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 May;135(5):3101-16
pubmed: 24926505
Science. 2021 Feb 5;371(6529):
pubmed: 33542110
J Exp Biol. 2022 Jan 1;225(1):
pubmed: 34882218
Ecol Appl. 2020 Apr;30(3):e02050
pubmed: 31821656
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Nov;132(5):3118-24
pubmed: 23145597
J Exp Biol. 2015 Mar;218(Pt 6):940-8
pubmed: 25617461
Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 Nov;172:112845
pubmed: 34399275
Mar Pollut Bull. 2022 Jan;174:113295
pubmed: 35090280
Hear Res. 2022 Nov;425:108393
pubmed: 34823877
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Apr;24(4):1708-1721
pubmed: 29194854
Conserv Biol. 2012 Dec;26(6):983-94
pubmed: 22891747
J Exp Biol. 2010 Sep;213(Pt 17):2997-3004
pubmed: 20709928
Adv Mar Biol. 2006;51:143-96
pubmed: 16905427
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;877:255-70
pubmed: 26515318
Hear Res. 2011 Mar;273(1-2):25-36
pubmed: 20034550
Mar Pollut Bull. 2016 Feb 15;103(1-2):15-38
pubmed: 26707982
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2021 Sep;207(5):641-655
pubmed: 34241712
Environ Pollut. 2018 Aug;239:367-374
pubmed: 29674215
J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Jan;143(1):470
pubmed: 29390747
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 18;11(2):e0149338
pubmed: 26890124
J Exp Biol. 2012 Oct 1;215(Pt 19):3429-35
pubmed: 22693030
Biol Lett. 2013 May 22;9(4):20130163
pubmed: 23697639
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 18;7(1):5713
pubmed: 28720760
Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 Dec;173(Pt A):112934
pubmed: 34537570
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 May;147(5):3408
pubmed: 32486818
Conserv Biol. 2010 Feb;24(1):207-16
pubmed: 19906066
J Exp Biol. 2006 Nov;209(Pt 22):4444-51
pubmed: 17079715
Mar Pollut Bull. 2018 Nov;136:282-290
pubmed: 30509809