A wiring diagram to integrate physiological traits of wheat yield potential.
Journal
Nature food
ISSN: 2662-1355
Titre abrégé: Nat Food
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101761102
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2022
05 2022
Historique:
received:
20
10
2021
accepted:
08
04
2022
medline:
1
5
2023
pubmed:
29
4
2023
entrez:
28
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
As crop yields are pushed closer to biophysical limits, achieving yield gains becomes increasingly challenging and will require more insight into deterministic pathways to yields. Here, we propose a wiring diagram as a platform to illustrate the interrelationships of the physiological traits that impact wheat yield potential and to serve as a decision support tool for crop scientists. The wiring diagram is based on the premise that crop yield is a function of photosynthesis (source), the investment of assimilates into reproductive organs (sinks) and the underlying processes that enable expression of both. By illustrating these linkages as coded wires, the wiring diagram can show connections among traits that may not have been apparent, and can inform new research hypotheses and guide crosses designed to accumulate beneficial traits and alleles in breeding. The wiring diagram can also serve to create an ever-richer common point of reference for refining crop models in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37117579
doi: 10.1038/s43016-022-00512-z
pii: 10.1038/s43016-022-00512-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
318-324Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Manners, R. & van Etten, J. Are agricultural researchers working on the right crops to enable food and nutrition security under future climates? Glob. Environ. Change 53, 182–194 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.010
Araus, J. L., Kefauver, S. C., Zaman-Allah, M., Olsen, M. S. & Cairns, J. E. Translating high-throughput phenotyping into genetic gain. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 451–466 (2018).
pubmed: 29555431
pmcid: 5931794
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.02.001
Varshney, R. K. et al. 5Gs for crop genetic improvement. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 56, 190–196 (2020).
pubmed: 32005553
pmcid: 7450269
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2019.12.004
Pingali, P. L. Green Revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 12302–12308 (2012).
pubmed: 22826253
pmcid: 3411969
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912953109
Lantican, M. A. et al. Impacts of International Wheat Research 1994-2014 (CIMMYT, 2016).
Challinor, A. J. et al. A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 287–297 (2014).
doi: 10.1038/nclimate2153
Crespo-Herrera, L. A. et al. Genetic yield gains in CIMMYT’S international elite spring wheat yield trials by modeling the genotype × environment interaction. Crop Sci. 57, 789–801 (2017).
pubmed: 33343008
pmcid: 7680939
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2016.06.0553
Singh, R. P. et al. Emergence and spread of new races of wheat stem rust fungus: continued threat to food security and prospects of genetic control. Phytopathology 105, 872–884 (2015).
pubmed: 26120730
doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-01-15-0030-FI
Xiong, W. et al. Increased ranking change in wheat breeding under climate change. Nat. Plants 7, 1207–1212 (2021).
pubmed: 34462575
doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00988-w
Reynolds, M. et al. Addressing research bottlenecks to crop productivity. Trends Plant Sci. 26, 607–630 (2021).
pubmed: 33893046
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.03.011
Paul, M. J., Watson, A. & Griffiths, C. A. Linking fundamental science to crop improvement through understanding source and sink traits and their integration for yield enhancement. J. Exp. Bot. 71, 2270–2280 (2020).
pubmed: 31665486
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz480
Chang, T.-G. & Zhu, X.-G. Source–sink interaction: a century old concept under the light of modern molecular systems biology. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 4417–4431 (2017).
pubmed: 28338782
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx002
Reynolds, M. P. et al. Strategic crossing of biomass and harvest index—source and sink—achieves genetic gains in wheat. Euphytica 213, 257 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s10681-017-2040-z
Lichthardt, C., Chen, T.-W., Stahl, A. & Stützel, H. Co-evolution of sink and source in the recent breeding history of winter wheat in Germany. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 1771 (2020).
pubmed: 32117340
pmcid: 7019858
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01771
Molero, G. & Reynolds, M. P. Spike photosynthesis measured at high throughput indicates genetic variation independent of flag leaf photosynthesis. Field Crops Res. 255, 107866 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107866
Valluru, R., Reynolds, M. P., Davies, W. J. & Sukumaran, S. Phenotypic and genome‐wide association analysis of spike ethylene in diverse wheat genotypes under heat stress. New Phytol. 214, 271–283 (2017).
pubmed: 27918628
doi: 10.1111/nph.14367
Whingwiri, E. E., Kuo, J. & Stern, W. R. The vascular system in the rachis of a wheat ear. Ann. Bot. 48, 189–202 (1981).
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a086113
Braun, D. M., Wang, L. & Ruan, Y. Understanding and manipulating sucrose phloem loading, unloading, metabolism, and signalling to enhance crop yield and food security. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 1713–1735 (2014).
pubmed: 24347463
doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert416
Regmi, K. C. et al. Improved yield and photosynthate partitioning in AVP1 expressing wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 273 (2020).
pubmed: 32256508
pmcid: 7090233
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00273
Slafer, G. A. & Savin, R. in Encyclopedia of Plant and Crop Science (ed. Goodman, R.) 1–4 (Taylor & Francis, 2006).
Slafer, G. A., Savin, R. & Sadras, V. O. Coarse and fine regulation of wheat yield components in response to genotype and environment. Field Crops Res. 157, 71–83 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.004
Bouman, B. A. M., van Keulen, H., van Laar, H. H. & Rabbinge, R. The ‘School of de Wit’ crop growth simulation models: a pedigree and historical overview. Agric. Syst. 52, 171–198 (1996).
doi: 10.1016/0308-521X(96)00011-X
Amir, J. & Sinclair, T. R. A model of the temperature and solar-radiation effects on spring wheat growth and yield. Field Crops Res. 28, 47–58 (1991).
doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(91)90073-5
Asseng, S. et al. Uncertainty in simulating wheat yields under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 827–832 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/nclimate1916
Mondal, S. et al. Fifty years of semi-dwarf spring wheat breeding at CIMMYT: grain yield progress in optimum, drought and heat stress environments. Field Crops Res. 250, 107757 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107757
Ferrante, A., Cartelle, J., Savin, R. & Slafer, G. A. Yield determination, interplay between major components and yield stability in a traditional and a contemporary wheat across a wide range of environments. Field Crops Res. 203, 114–127 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.028
Aisawi, K. A. B., Reynolds, M. P., Singh, R. P. & Foulkes, M. J. The physiological basis of the genetic progress in yield potential of CIMMYT spring wheat cultivars from 1966 to 2009. Crop Sci. 55, 1749–1764 (2015).
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2014.09.0601
Fischer, R. A. Number of kernels in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature. J. Agric. Sci. 105, 447–461 (1985).
doi: 10.1017/S0021859600056495
Fischer, R. A. Wheat physiology: a review of recent developments. Crop Pasture Sci. 62, 95–114 (2011).
doi: 10.1071/CP10344
Slafer, G. A., Savin, R., Pinochet, D. & Calderini, D. in Crop Physiology Case Histories for Major Crops (eds Sadras, V. & Calderini, D.) 99–163 (Academic, 2021).
Calderini, D. F. et al. Overcoming the trade-off between grain weight and number in wheat by the ectopic expression of expansin in developing seeds leads to increased yield potential. New Phytol. 230, 629–640 (2021).
pubmed: 33124693
doi: 10.1111/nph.17048
Luquet, D., Dingkuhn, M., Kim, H., Tambour, L. & Clement-Vidal, A. EcoMeristem, a model of morphogenesis and competition among sinks in rice. 1. Concept, validation and sensitivity analysis. Funct. Plant Biol. 33, 309–323 (2006).
pubmed: 32689238
doi: 10.1071/FP05266
Prasad, P. V. V. & Djanaguiraman, M. Response of floret fertility and individual grain weight of wheat to high temperature stress: sensitive stages and thresholds for temperature and duration. Funct. Plant Biol. 41, 1261–1269 (2014).
pubmed: 32481075
doi: 10.1071/FP14061
Reynolds, M. et al. Raising yield potential in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 1899–1918 (2009).
pubmed: 19363203
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp016
Serrago, R. A., Alzueta, I., Savin, R. & Slafer, G. A. Understanding grain yield responses to source–sink ratios during grain filling in wheat and barley under contrasting environments. Field Crops Res. 150, 42–51 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.05.016
Rivera-Amado, C. et al. Optimizing dry-matter partitioning for increased spike growth, grain number and harvest index in spring wheat. Field Crops Res. 240, 154–167 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.04.016
López-Calcagno, P. E. et al. Stimulating photosynthetic processes increases productivity and water-use efficiency in the field. Nat. Plants 6, 1054–1063 (2020).
pubmed: 32782406
doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0740-1
Lyra, D. H. et al. Gene-based mapping of trehalose biosynthetic pathway genes reveals association with source- and sink-related yield traits in a spring wheat panel. Food Energy Secur. 10, e292 (2021).
pubmed: 34594548
pmcid: 8459250
doi: 10.1002/fes3.292
Wang, Y. et al. Transcriptome association identifies regulators of wheat spike architecture. Plant Physiol. 175, 746–757 (2017).
pubmed: 28807930
pmcid: 5619896
doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00694
Hu, J. et al. QTL mapping for yield-related traits in wheat based on four RIL populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 133, 917–933 (2020).
pubmed: 31897512
doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03515-w
Amini, F., Franco, F. R., Hu, G. & Wang, L. The look ahead trace back optimizer for genomic selection under transparent and opaque simulators. Sci. Rep. 11, 4124 (2021).
pubmed: 33602979
pmcid: 7893003
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83567-5
Richards, R. A. Physiological traits used in the breeding of new cultivars for water-scarce environments. Agric. Water Manag. 80, 197–211 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.013
Juliana, P. et al. Improving grain yield, stress resilience and quality of bread wheat using large-scale genomics. Nat. Genet. 51, 1530–1539 (2019).
pubmed: 31548720
doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0496-6
Uauy, C., Wulff, B. B. H. & Dubcovsky, J. Combining traditional mutagenesis with new high-throughput sequencing and genome editing to reveal hidden variation in polyploid wheat. Annu. Rev. Genet. 51, 435–454 (2017).
pubmed: 28934591
doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120116-024533
Messina, C. D. et al. On the dynamic determinants of reproductive failure under drought in maize. in sil. Plants 1, diz003 (2019).
doi: 10.1093/insilicoplants/diz003
Kassie, B. T., Asseng, S., Porter, C. H. & Royce, F. S. Performance of DSSAT-Nwheat across a wide range of current and future growing conditions. Eur. J. Agron. 81, 27–36 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2016.08.012
Asseng, S. et al. Hot ÿspots of wheat yield decline with rising temperatures. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 2464–2472 (2017).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.13530
Asseng, S. et al. Hot spots of wheat yield decline with rising temperatures. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 2464–2472 (2017).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.13530
Rosenzweig, C. et al. The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP): protocols and pilot studies. Agric. For. Meteorol. 170, 166–182 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.011
Maiorano, A. et al. Crop model improvement reduces the uncertainty of the response to temperature of multi-model ensembles. Field Crops Res. 202, 5–20 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.05.001
Wang, E. et al. The uncertainty of crop yield projections is reduced by improved temperature response functions. Nat. Plants 3, 17102 (2017).
pubmed: 28714956
doi: 10.1038/nplants.2017.102
Yan, L. et al. Allelic variation at the VRN-1 promoter region in polyploid wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109, 1677–1686 (2004).
pubmed: 15480533
doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1796-4
Boden, S. A. et al. Ppd-1 is a key regulator of inflorescence architecture and paired spikelet development in wheat. Nat. Plants 1, 14016 (2015).
pubmed: 27246757
doi: 10.1038/nplants.2014.16
Miralles, D., Katz, S. D., Colloca, A. & Slafer, G. A. Floret development in near isogenic wheat lines differing in plant height. Field Crops Res. 59, 21–30 (1998).
doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(98)00103-8
Dreisigacker, S. et al. Effect of flowering time-related genes on biomass, harvest index, and grain yield in CIMMYT elite spring bread wheat. Biology 10, 855 (2021).
pubmed: 34571732
pmcid: 8471161
doi: 10.3390/biology10090855
Hyles, J., Bloomfield, M. T., Hunt, J. R., Trethowan, R. M. & Trevaskis, B. Phenology and related traits for wheat adaptation. Heredity 125, 417–430 (2020).
pubmed: 32457509
pmcid: 7784700
doi: 10.1038/s41437-020-0320-1