Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Outpatient Tisagenlecleucel Recipients for B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.


Journal

Transplantation and cellular therapy
ISSN: 2666-6367
Titre abrégé: Transplant Cell Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101774629

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2023
Historique:
received: 20 03 2023
revised: 15 04 2023
accepted: 24 04 2023
medline: 5 7 2023
pubmed: 30 4 2023
entrez: 29 4 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) is an approved CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy for relapsed/refractory B cell malignancies. Given potentially life-threatening toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, inpatient tisa-cel infusion and toxicity monitoring are often considered; however, the toxicity profile of tisa-cel may be conducive to outpatient administration. Here we review the characteristics and outcomes of tisa-cel recipients treated in the outpatient setting. Patients age ≥18 years with B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma who received tisa-cel between June 25, 2018, and January 22, 2021, at 9 US academic medical centers were included in a retrospective analysis. Six of the 9 representative centers (75%) had an outpatient program in place. A total of 157 patients were evaluable, including 93 (57%) in the outpatient treatment group and 64 (43%) in the inpatient treatment group. Baseline characteristics, toxicity and efficacy, and resource utilization were summarized. The most common lymphodepletion (LD) regimen was bendamustine in the outpatient group (65%) and fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (91%) in the inpatient group. The outpatient group had more patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 0 (51% versus 15%; P < .001), fewer patients with an elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level above the normal range at the time of LD (32% versus 57%, P = .003) compared to the inpatient group, and a lower Endothelial Activation and Stress Index score (.57 versus 1.4; P < .001). Any-grade CRS and ICANS were lower in the outpatient group (29% versus 56% [P < .001] and 10% versus 16% [P = .051], respectively). Forty-two outpatient tisa-cel recipients (45%) required an unplanned admission, with a median length of stay of 5 days (range, 1 to 27 days), compared to 13 days (range, 4 to 38 days) in the inpatient group. The median number of tocilizumab doses administered was similar in the 2 groups as were the rate of intensive care unit (ICU) transfer (5% versus 8%; P = .5) and median length of ICU stay (6 days versus 5 days; P = .7). There were no toxicity-related deaths in the 30 days post-CAR-T infusion in either group. Progression-free survival and overall survival were similar in the 2 groups. With careful patient selection, outpatient tisa-cel administration is feasible and associated with similar efficacy outcomes as inpatient treatment. Outpatient toxicity monitoring and management may help optimize healthcare resource utilization.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37120134
pii: S2666-6367(23)01255-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.04.019
pmc: PMC11027185
mid: NIHMS1976681
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

tisagenlecleucel Q6C9WHR03O
cell-associated neurotoxicity 0
Receptors, Chimeric Antigen 0

Types de publication

Review Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

449.e1-449.e7

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P01 CA065493
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 20;38(27):3119-3128
pubmed: 32401634
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):91-103
pubmed: 34895487
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Oct;28(10):669-676
pubmed: 35850429
Blood Adv. 2020 Feb 25;4(4):676-686
pubmed: 32084260
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2022 Dec;57(12):1839-1841
pubmed: 36131002
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 3;380(1):45-56
pubmed: 30501490
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Apr;25(4):625-638
pubmed: 30592986
Blood Cancer J. 2020 Aug 5;10(8):79
pubmed: 32759935
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 2;382(14):1331-1342
pubmed: 32242358
Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 Jul;27(7):558-570
pubmed: 33910041
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 Aug;22(8):e730-e737
pubmed: 35595619
Lancet. 2020 Sep 19;396(10254):839-852
pubmed: 32888407
Blood. 2022 Sep 8;140(10):1056-1058
pubmed: 36074532
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 10;38(5):384-387
pubmed: 31675247
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2022 Jun;57(6):1025-1027
pubmed: 35411106
Blood Adv. 2020 Apr 14;4(7):1440-1447
pubmed: 32271898
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):31-42
pubmed: 30518502
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Dec;25(12):2305-2321
pubmed: 31446199
Blood Adv. 2021 Jul 27;5(14):2799-2806
pubmed: 34264268
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015 Jul;14(7):499-509
pubmed: 26129802
Blood Adv. 2020 Aug 11;4(15):3776-3787
pubmed: 32780846
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2023 Jan;22(1):5-15
pubmed: 36737060
Blood Adv. 2021 Mar 23;5(6):1695-1705
pubmed: 33720336
Blood Adv. 2021 Sep 14;5(17):3397-3406
pubmed: 34432870
Cancer Cell. 2015 Oct 12;28(4):415-428
pubmed: 26461090
Blood Adv. 2020 Nov 10;4(21):5414-5424
pubmed: 33147337
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Sep;28(9):583-585
pubmed: 35781100

Auteurs

Nausheen Ahmed (N)

University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas. Electronic address: nahmed5@kumc.edu.

William Wesson (W)

University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.

Muhammad Umair Mushtaq (MU)

University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.

David L Porter (DL)

University of Pennsylvania and Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Sunita D Nasta (SD)

University of Pennsylvania and Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Jamie Brower (J)

University of Pennsylvania and Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Veronika Bachanova (V)

Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Marie Hu (M)

Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Loretta J Nastoupil (LJ)

Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Olalekan O Oluwole (OO)

Hematology Oncology and Stem Cell Transplant, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Vivek G Patel (VG)

Hematology Oncology and Stem Cell Transplant, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Caspian Oliai (C)

Department of Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.

Peter A Riedell (PA)

The David and Etta Jonas Center for Cellular Therapy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Michael R Bishop (MR)

The David and Etta Jonas Center for Cellular Therapy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Gunjan L Shah (GL)

Department of Medicine, Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Miguel-Angel Perales (MA)

Department of Medicine, Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Levanto Schachter (L)

Adult Blood and Marrow Stem Cell Transplant Program, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Richard T Maziarz (RT)

Adult Blood and Marrow Stem Cell Transplant Program, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Joseph P McGuirk (JP)

University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH