Data-driven characterization of walking after a spinal cord injury using inertial sensors.

Digital health Gait analysis Inertial sensors Rehabilitation Spinal cord injury

Journal

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1743-0003
Titre abrégé: J Neuroeng Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101232233

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 04 2023
Historique:
received: 22 09 2022
accepted: 19 04 2023
medline: 1 5 2023
pubmed: 30 4 2023
entrez: 29 4 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

An incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) refers to remaining sensorimotor function below the injury with the possibility for the patient to regain walking abilities. However, these patients often suffer from diverse gait deficits, which are not objectively assessed in the current clinical routine. Wearable inertial sensors are a promising tool to capture gait patterns objectively and started to gain ground for other neurological disorders such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson's disease. In this work, we present a data-driven approach to assess walking for SCI patients based on sensor-derived outcome measures. We aimed to (i) characterize their walking pattern in more depth by identifying groups with similar walking characteristics and (ii) use sensor-derived gait parameters as predictors for future walking capacity. The dataset analyzed consisted of 66 SCI patients and 20 healthy controls performing a standardized gait test, namely the 6-min walking test (6MWT), while wearing a sparse sensor setup of one sensor attached to each ankle. A data-driven approach has been followed using statistical methods and machine learning models to identify relevant and non-redundant gait parameters. Clustering resulted in 4 groups of patients that were compared to each other and to the healthy controls. The clusters did differ in terms of their average walking speed but also in terms of more qualitative gait parameters such as variability or parameters indicating compensatory movements. Further, using longitudinal data from a subset of patients that performed the 6MWT several times during their rehabilitation, a prediction model has been trained to estimate whether the patient's walking speed will improve significantly in the future. Including sensor-derived gait parameters as inputs for the prediction model resulted in an accuracy of 80%, which is a considerable improvement of 10% compared to using only the days since injury, the present 6MWT distance, and the days until the next 6MWT as predictors. In summary, the work presented proves that sensor-derived gait parameters provide additional information on walking characteristics and thus are beneficial to complement clinical walking assessments of SCI patients. This work is a step towards a more deficit-oriented therapy and paves the way for better rehabilitation outcome predictions.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
An incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) refers to remaining sensorimotor function below the injury with the possibility for the patient to regain walking abilities. However, these patients often suffer from diverse gait deficits, which are not objectively assessed in the current clinical routine. Wearable inertial sensors are a promising tool to capture gait patterns objectively and started to gain ground for other neurological disorders such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson's disease. In this work, we present a data-driven approach to assess walking for SCI patients based on sensor-derived outcome measures. We aimed to (i) characterize their walking pattern in more depth by identifying groups with similar walking characteristics and (ii) use sensor-derived gait parameters as predictors for future walking capacity.
METHODS
The dataset analyzed consisted of 66 SCI patients and 20 healthy controls performing a standardized gait test, namely the 6-min walking test (6MWT), while wearing a sparse sensor setup of one sensor attached to each ankle. A data-driven approach has been followed using statistical methods and machine learning models to identify relevant and non-redundant gait parameters.
RESULTS
Clustering resulted in 4 groups of patients that were compared to each other and to the healthy controls. The clusters did differ in terms of their average walking speed but also in terms of more qualitative gait parameters such as variability or parameters indicating compensatory movements. Further, using longitudinal data from a subset of patients that performed the 6MWT several times during their rehabilitation, a prediction model has been trained to estimate whether the patient's walking speed will improve significantly in the future. Including sensor-derived gait parameters as inputs for the prediction model resulted in an accuracy of 80%, which is a considerable improvement of 10% compared to using only the days since injury, the present 6MWT distance, and the days until the next 6MWT as predictors.
CONCLUSIONS
In summary, the work presented proves that sensor-derived gait parameters provide additional information on walking characteristics and thus are beneficial to complement clinical walking assessments of SCI patients. This work is a step towards a more deficit-oriented therapy and paves the way for better rehabilitation outcome predictions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37120519
doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01178-9
pii: 10.1186/s12984-023-01178-9
pmc: PMC10149024
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

55

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Sep;87(9):1218-22
pubmed: 16935058
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:2508-11
pubmed: 25570500
Sensors (Basel). 2020 May 06;20(9):
pubmed: 32384806
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 Jul-Aug;21(4):358-65
pubmed: 17353461
Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Dec 30;29(24):1926-33
pubmed: 17852230
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 14;19(18):
pubmed: 36141834
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Apr 29;16(1):53
pubmed: 31036003
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1973 Dec;54(12):544-7
pubmed: 4759444
Phys Ther. 2002 Jul;82(7):707-15
pubmed: 12088467
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Mar 17;8:148
pubmed: 24672464
Spinal Cord. 2006 Sep;44(9):523-9
pubmed: 16389270
Spinal Cord. 2021 Jun;59(6):675-683
pubmed: 33024297
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 May;23(4):313-9
pubmed: 19118128
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Feb;80(2):225-35
pubmed: 10025502
Ann Rehabil Med. 2013 Feb;37(1):50-6
pubmed: 23525183
J Biomed Eng. 1985 Oct;7(4):282-8
pubmed: 4057987
Spinal Cord. 2001 Dec;39(12):654-6
pubmed: 11781863
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 May 29;15(1):44
pubmed: 29843763
Spinal Cord. 2006 Jun;44(6):352-6
pubmed: 16304565
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 02;22(11):
pubmed: 35684860
Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2014;16(1):29-35
pubmed: 24708092
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 Jul-Aug;21(4):302-6
pubmed: 17369517
Front Psychol. 2017 May 18;8:817
pubmed: 28572784
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Dec 09;12:112
pubmed: 26651329
J Neurotrauma. 2016 Aug 1;33(15):1428-35
pubmed: 26896097
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013 Mar;1279:164-74
pubmed: 23531014
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2016 Nov;20(6):1521-1537
pubmed: 28113185
Spinal Cord. 2004 Mar;42(3):156-62
pubmed: 15001980
J Neurotrauma. 2008 Jun;25(6):677-85
pubmed: 18578636
Spinal Cord. 2018 Jul;56(7):628-642
pubmed: 29700477
Control Clin Trials. 1991 Aug;12(4 Suppl):142S-158S
pubmed: 1663851
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2022 Jan;60(1):249-261
pubmed: 34822120
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012 Aug;59(8):2126-36
pubmed: 22180502
Spinal Cord. 2008 Apr;46(4):246-54
pubmed: 17923844
Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;159:367-384
pubmed: 30482328
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 01;22(21):
pubmed: 36366088
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Nov 06;21(21):
pubmed: 34770686
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013 Jul;68(7):820-7
pubmed: 23250001

Auteurs

Charlotte Werner (C)

Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. Charlotte.Werner@hest.ethz.ch.
Rehabilitation Engineering Laboratory, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. Charlotte.Werner@hest.ethz.ch.

Meltem Gönel (M)

Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Irina Lerch (I)

Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Armin Curt (A)

Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

László Demkó (L)

Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH