Disruptions in Standard Care in Patients After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
physical therapy
rotator cuff repair
shoulder
telehealth
telemedicine
Journal
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
31
10
2022
accepted:
13
12
2022
medline:
1
5
2023
pubmed:
1
5
2023
entrez:
1
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to disruptions in care for orthopaedic patients who underwent surgery just before the outbreak, rendering some unable to participate in standard postoperative care. Many of these patients underwent clinical follow-up and physical therapy via telehealth. To evaluate the methods of postoperative care in patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) and had follow-ups during the height of the pandemic versus those who received prior standard of care. We aimed to compare the 1-year outcomes between these cohorts. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. A retrospective chart review was used to identify patients who underwent primary RCR in February and March 2020 (COVID cohort) and the same period in 2019 (control cohort) at a single institution. Excluded were patients who underwent revision RCR, used workers' compensation, or were incarcerated or deceased. The included patients reported the postoperative care received, their satisfaction with care, physical therapy appointment type (in person, home based, telehealth, or self-guided), satisfaction with physical therapy, and minimum 1-year postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Penn Shoulder Score (PSS) outcomes. Overall, 428 patients were included for final analysis--199 in the COVID cohort and 229 controls. Follow-up data were collected for 160 patients in the COVID group (80.4%) and 169 control patients (73.8%). In the COVID group, 110 patients (68.8%) had ≥1 clinical visit conducted via telehealth, compared with zero in the control group. There were no differences between the COVID and control groups in the ASES (84.2 ± 16.5 vs 86.5 ± 17; Despite disruptions in care, RCR patients had comparable 1-year outcomes during the pandemic versus before the pandemic. Telehealth clinical follow-up appointments did not adversely affect patient-reported outcome measures and may be appropriate for RCR patients beyond the pandemic.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to disruptions in care for orthopaedic patients who underwent surgery just before the outbreak, rendering some unable to participate in standard postoperative care. Many of these patients underwent clinical follow-up and physical therapy via telehealth.
Purpose
UNASSIGNED
To evaluate the methods of postoperative care in patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) and had follow-ups during the height of the pandemic versus those who received prior standard of care. We aimed to compare the 1-year outcomes between these cohorts.
Study Design
UNASSIGNED
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
A retrospective chart review was used to identify patients who underwent primary RCR in February and March 2020 (COVID cohort) and the same period in 2019 (control cohort) at a single institution. Excluded were patients who underwent revision RCR, used workers' compensation, or were incarcerated or deceased. The included patients reported the postoperative care received, their satisfaction with care, physical therapy appointment type (in person, home based, telehealth, or self-guided), satisfaction with physical therapy, and minimum 1-year postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Penn Shoulder Score (PSS) outcomes.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Overall, 428 patients were included for final analysis--199 in the COVID cohort and 229 controls. Follow-up data were collected for 160 patients in the COVID group (80.4%) and 169 control patients (73.8%). In the COVID group, 110 patients (68.8%) had ≥1 clinical visit conducted via telehealth, compared with zero in the control group. There were no differences between the COVID and control groups in the ASES (84.2 ± 16.5 vs 86.5 ± 17;
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Despite disruptions in care, RCR patients had comparable 1-year outcomes during the pandemic versus before the pandemic. Telehealth clinical follow-up appointments did not adversely affect patient-reported outcome measures and may be appropriate for RCR patients beyond the pandemic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37123993
doi: 10.1177/23259671231157380
pii: 10.1177_23259671231157380
pmc: PMC10134137
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
23259671231157380Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: F.P.T. has received research support from Smith & Nephew and consulting fees from DePuy and has stock/stock options in Franklin/Keystone Biosciences and Trice Medical. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Références
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Jun 3;102(11):942-945
pubmed: 32282419
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jan;19(1):97-101
pubmed: 19559629
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 May;26(5):915-922
pubmed: 28314695
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Apr;29(4):775-783
pubmed: 32197766
J Athl Train. 2020 Aug 1;55(8):768-779
pubmed: 32693404
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Feb;25(2):595-601
pubmed: 27342982
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Jun 1;28(11):e487-e492
pubmed: 32459409
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Nov;23(11):1631-9
pubmed: 25127908
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Nov 20;95(22):1993-2000
pubmed: 24257656
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Dec;22(12):1628-32
pubmed: 23466172
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002 Nov;32(11):548-59
pubmed: 12449254
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Jan;52(2):111-121
pubmed: 28039127
PM R. 2017 May;9(5S):S51-S58
pubmed: 28527504
Clin Rehabil. 2017 May;31(5):625-638
pubmed: 27141087
Open Orthop J. 2017 Feb 28;11:154-162
pubmed: 28400883
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Sep 6;99(17):e93
pubmed: 28872535
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S209-S214
pubmed: 30795937
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 May 5;103(9):771-777
pubmed: 33720907
Am J Sports Med. 2015 May;43(5):1265-73
pubmed: 25143489
Arthroscopy. 2011 Jun;27(6):842-8
pubmed: 21624680
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Sep 21;6(9):2325967118797891
pubmed: 30320144
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Jul;24(6):428-433
pubmed: 28449618
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 18;8(11):e24311
pubmed: 33206059
J Telemed Telecare. 2021 Feb 1;:1357633X21990997
pubmed: 33525951
Shoulder Elbow. 2015 Apr;7(2):115-24
pubmed: 27582966
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Jan 08;15:4
pubmed: 24397703
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Apr;25(4):521-35
pubmed: 26995456
Ann Rehabil Med. 2016 Aug;40(4):710-7
pubmed: 27606278
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1972-81
pubmed: 24562873
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Nov;32(11):3322-3327
pubmed: 28693888
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Oct;141(10):1731-1739
pubmed: 33635399