Semi-automatic artifact quantification in thermal ablation probe and algorithms for the evaluation of metal artifact reduction.
CT-guidance
Metal artifact reduction
computed tomography
cryoablation
image quality
microwave ablation
radiofrequency ablation
Journal
International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group
ISSN: 1464-5157
Titre abrégé: Int J Hyperthermia
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8508395
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
medline:
3
5
2023
pubmed:
2
5
2023
entrez:
1
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare metal artifacts and evaluation of metal artifact reduction algorithms during probe positioning in computed tomography (CT)-guided microwave ablation (MWA), cryoablation (CRYO), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Using CT guidance, individual MWA, CRYO, and RFA ablation probes were placed into the livers of 15 pigs. CT imaging was then performed to determine the probe's position within the test subject's liver. Filtered back projection (B30f) and iterative reconstructions (I30-1) were both used with and without dedicated iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR) to generate images from the initial data sets. Semi-automatic segmentation-based quantitative evaluation was conducted to estimate artifact percentage within the liver, while qualitative evaluation of metal artifact extent and overall image quality was performed by two observers using a 5-point Likert scale: 1-none, 2-mild, 3-moderate, 4-severe, 5-non-diagnostic. Among MWA, RFA, and CRYO, compared with non-iMAR in B30f reconstruction, the largest extent of artifact volume percentages were observed for CRYO (11.5-17.9%), followed by MWA (4.7-6.6%) and lastly in RFA (5.5-6.2%). iMAR significantly reduces metal artifacts for CRYO and MWA quantitatively ( A dedicated metal artifact algorithm may decrease metal artifacts and improves image quality significantly for MWA and CRYO probes. Their application alongside with dedicated metal artifact algorithm should be considered during CT-guided positioning.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37127281
doi: 10.1080/02656736.2023.2205071
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM