Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer.


Journal

The American surgeon
ISSN: 1555-9823
Titre abrégé: Am Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370522

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Apr 2023
Historique:
medline: 2 5 2023
pubmed: 2 5 2023
entrez: 1 5 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Application of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) to advanced gastric cancer is still controversial due to lack of sufficient surgical and oncological outcomes. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the feasibility of LG for advanced gastric cancer by multicenter prospective cohort study. A total of 98 patients with clinical stage II or III gastric cancer from 8 institutes were analyzed in this study. The primary endpoint was incidence of severe postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo classification grade Ⅲa or higher. Sixty-six patients underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG), 10 patients laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG), 21 patients laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG), and 1 patient received gastro-jejunostomy. Seven patients had positive lavage cytology (CY1) and R0 rate was 90.8%. Three patients (3.1%) required conversion to open surgery. The incidence of overall postoperative complications and severe postoperative complications were 17.3% and 9.2%, respectively, those were comparable to the data of open surgery for advanced gastric cancer previously published. By surgical procedure, the incidence of severe postoperative complications of LDG, LPG, and LTG were 4.6, 0, and 28.6% and the rate of severe anastomotic leakage of LDG, LPG, and LTG were 0, 0, and 9.5%, respectively. Total gastrectomy was an only independent risk factor of severe postoperative complications in LG for advanced gastric cancer (odds ratio 8.75; 95% confidence interval 1.70-56.69, P = .0092). The incidence of severe postoperative complications after LG performed by qualified surgeons was acceptable even in cases of advanced gastric cancer; however, careful attention is required to adopt LTG. (UMIN000025733).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Application of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) to advanced gastric cancer is still controversial due to lack of sufficient surgical and oncological outcomes. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the feasibility of LG for advanced gastric cancer by multicenter prospective cohort study.
METHODS METHODS
A total of 98 patients with clinical stage II or III gastric cancer from 8 institutes were analyzed in this study. The primary endpoint was incidence of severe postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo classification grade Ⅲa or higher.
RESULTS RESULTS
Sixty-six patients underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG), 10 patients laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG), 21 patients laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG), and 1 patient received gastro-jejunostomy. Seven patients had positive lavage cytology (CY1) and R0 rate was 90.8%. Three patients (3.1%) required conversion to open surgery. The incidence of overall postoperative complications and severe postoperative complications were 17.3% and 9.2%, respectively, those were comparable to the data of open surgery for advanced gastric cancer previously published. By surgical procedure, the incidence of severe postoperative complications of LDG, LPG, and LTG were 4.6, 0, and 28.6% and the rate of severe anastomotic leakage of LDG, LPG, and LTG were 0, 0, and 9.5%, respectively. Total gastrectomy was an only independent risk factor of severe postoperative complications in LG for advanced gastric cancer (odds ratio 8.75; 95% confidence interval 1.70-56.69, P = .0092).
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
The incidence of severe postoperative complications after LG performed by qualified surgeons was acceptable even in cases of advanced gastric cancer; however, careful attention is required to adopt LTG. (UMIN000025733).

Identifiants

pubmed: 37127301
doi: 10.1177/00031348221114042
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

31348221114042

Auteurs

Kazuyoshi Yamamoto (K)

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita Japan.

Takeshi Omori (T)

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.

Yukinori Kurokawa (Y)

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita Japan.

Atsushi Takeno (A)

Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan.

Yusuke Akamaru (Y)

Department of Surgery, Ikeda City Hospital, Ikeda, Japan.

Koichi Demura (K)

Department of Surgery, Rinku General Medical Center, Izumisano, Japan.

Kazuyuki Okada (K)

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital, Nishinomiya, Japan.

Kentaro Kishi (K)

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita Japan.

Takuro Saito (T)

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita Japan.

Tsuyoshi Takahashi (T)

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita Japan.

Hidetoshi Eguchi (H)

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita Japan.

Yuichiro Doki (Y)

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita Japan.

Classifications MeSH