A natural mutation in Pisum sativum L. (pea) alters starch assembly and improves glucose homeostasis in humans.
Journal
Nature food
ISSN: 2662-1355
Titre abrégé: Nat Food
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101761102
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
06
12
2019
accepted:
02
09
2020
medline:
1
11
2020
pubmed:
1
11
2020
entrez:
2
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Elevated postprandial glucose (PPG) is a significant risk factor for non-communicable diseases globally. Currently, there is a limited understanding of how starch structures within a carbohydrate-rich food matrix interact with the gut luminal environment to control PPG. Here, we use pea seeds (Pisum sativum) and pea flour, derived from two near-identical pea genotypes (BC1/19RR and BC1/19rr) differing primarily in the type of starch accumulated, to explore the contribution of starch structure, food matrix and intestinal environment to PPG. Using stable isotope
Identifiants
pubmed: 37128029
doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-00159-8
pii: 10.1038/s43016-020-00159-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
693-704Subventions
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BBS/E/J/000CA392
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/P028225/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2020. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Références
O’Keefe, J. H. & Bell, D. S. Postprandial hyperglycemia/hyperlipidemia (postprandial dysmetabolism) is a cardiovascular risk factor. Am. J. Cardiol. 100, 899–904 (2007).
pubmed: 17719342
Wolever, T. M. & Bolognesi, C. Source and amount of carbohydrate affect postprandial glucose and insulin in normal subjects. J. Nutr. 126, 2798–2806 (1996).
pubmed: 8914951
Jenkins, D. et al. Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 34, 362–366 (1981).
pubmed: 6259925
Jenkins, D. J. et al. Glycemic index: overview of implications in health and disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 76, 266S–273S (2002).
pubmed: 12081850
Greenwood, D. C. et al. Glycemic index, glycemic load, carbohydrates, and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Diabetes Care 36, 4166–4171 (2013).
pubmed: 24265366
pmcid: 3836142
Jenkins, D. J. et al. Effect of a low–glycemic index or a high–cereal fiber diet on type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 300, 2742–2753 (2008).
Wang, S. & Copeland, L. Molecular disassembly of starch granules during gelatinization and its effect on starch digestibility: a review. Food Funct. 4, 1564–1580 (2013).
pubmed: 24096569
Sievenpiper, J. et al. Effect of non-oil-seed pulses on glycaemic control: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled experimental trials in people with and without diabetes. Diabetologia 52, 1479 (2009).
pubmed: 19526214
Rayner, T. et al. Genetic variation controlling wrinkled seed phenotypes in Pisum: how lucky was Mendel? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 1205 (2017).
pmcid: 5486028
Bhattacharyya, M. K. et al. The wrinkled-seed character of pea described by Mendel is caused by a transposon-like insertion in a gene encoding starch-branching enzyme. Cell 60, 115–122 (1990).
pubmed: 2153053
Satoh, H. et al. Starch-branching enzyme I-deficient mutation specifically affects the structure and properties of starch in rice endosperm. Plant Physiol. 133, 1111–1121 (2003).
pubmed: 14526120
pmcid: 281607
Sun, Y. et al. Generation of high-amylose rice through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of starch branching enzymes. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 298 (2017).
pubmed: 28326091
pmcid: 5339335
Hazard, B. et al. Induced mutations in the starch branching enzyme II (SBEII) genes increase amylose and resistant starch content in durum wheat. Crop Sci. 52, 1754–1766 (2012).
pubmed: 26924849
pmcid: 4768815
Schönhofen, A., Zhang, X. & Dubcovsky, J. Combined mutations in five wheat STARCH BRANCHING ENZYME II genes improve resistant starch but affect grain yield and bread-making quality. J. Cereal Sci. 75, 165–174 (2017).
Tuncel, A. et al. Cas9‐mediated mutagenesis of potato starch‐branching enzymes generates a range of tuber starch phenotypes. Plant Biotechnol. J. 17, 2259–2271 (2019).
pubmed: 31033104
pmcid: 6835119
Ghoos, Y. F. et al. Measurement of gastric emptying rate of solids by means of a carbon-labeled octanoic acid breath test. Gastroenterology 104, 1640–1647 (1993).
pubmed: 8500721
McCleary, B. V. & Monaghan, D. A. Measurement of resistant starch. J. AOAC Int. 85, 665–675 (2002).
pubmed: 12083259
Gidley, M. et al. Molecular order and structure in enzyme-resistant retrograded starch. Carbohydr. Polym. 28, 23–31 (1995).
Lopez-Rubio, A. et al. Molecular rearrangement of starch during in vitro digestion: toward a better understanding of enzyme resistant starch formation in processed starches. Biomacromolecules 9, 1951–1958 (2008).
pubmed: 18529077
Shrestha, A. K. et al. Enzyme resistance and structural organization in extruded high amylose maize starch. Carbohydr. Polym. 80, 699–710 (2010).
Skrabanja, V. et al. Influence of genotype and processing on the in vitro rate of starch hydrolysis and resistant starch formation in peas (Pisum sativum L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 47, 2033–2039 (1999).
pubmed: 10552491
Zhou, Y., Hoover, R. & Liu, Q. Relationship between α-amylase degradation and the structure and physicochemical properties of legume starches. Carbohydr. Polym. 57, 299–317 (2004).
Lambeth, S. M. et al. Composition, diversity and abundance of gut microbiome in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes. J. Diabetes 2, 1–7 (2015).
Edwards, C. H. et al. Manipulation of starch bioaccessibility in wheat endosperm to regulate starch digestion, postprandial glycemia, insulinemia, and gut hormone responses: a randomized controlled trial in healthy ileostomy participants, 2. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 102, 791–800 (2015).
pubmed: 26333512
pmcid: 4588739
Tahir, R. et al. Study of the structure and properties of native and hydrothermally processed wild-type, lam and r variant pea starches that affect amylolysis of these starches. Biomacromolecules 12, 123–133 (2010).
pubmed: 21158380
Edwards, C. H. et al. A comparison of the kinetics of in vitro starch digestion in smooth and wrinkled peas by porcine pancreatic alpha-amylase. Food Chem. 244, 386–393 (2018).
pubmed: 29120798
Pilichiewicz, A. N. et al. Load-dependent effects of duodenal glucose on glycemia, gastrointestinal hormones, antropyloroduodenal motility, and energy intake in healthy men. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 293, E743–E753 (2007).
pubmed: 17609258
Zhang, G., Ao, Z. & Hamaker, B. R. Slow digestion property of native cereal starches. Biomacromolecules 7, 3252–3258 (2006).
pubmed: 17096558
Donohoe, D. R. et al. The microbiome and butyrate regulate energy metabolism and autophagy in the mammalian colon. Cell Metab. 13, 517–526 (2011).
pubmed: 21531334
pmcid: 3099420
Panwar, H. et al. Probiotics as potential biotherapeutics in the management of type 2 diabetes–prospects and perspectives. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 29, 103–112 (2013).
pubmed: 23225499
Julious, S. A. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm. Stat. 4, 287–291 (2005).
Te Morenga, L. et al. Effect of a relatively high-protein, high-fiber diet on body composition and metabolic risk factors in overweight women. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 64, 1323–1331 (2010).
pubmed: 20842168
Preston, T. & McMillan, D. Rapid sample throughput for biomedical stable isotope tracer studies. Biomed. Environ. Mass Spectrom. 16, 229–235 (1988).
pubmed: 3149535
Edwards, C. et al. Production of
Kreymann, B., Ghatei, M. A., Williams, G. & Bloom, S. R. Glucagon-like peptide-1 7-36: a physiological incretin in man. Lancet 330, 1300–1304 (1987).
Garcia-Perez, I. et al. Identifying unknown metabolites using NMR-based metabolic profiling techniques. Nat. Protoc. 15, 2538–2567 (2020).
pubmed: 32681152
Morrison, D. J., O'Hara, J. P., King, R. F. G. J. & Preston, T. Quantitation of plasma
pubmed: 21818809
Morrison, D. J. et al. A streamlined approach to the analysis of volatile fatty acids and its application to the measurement of whole‐body flux. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 18, 2593–2600 (2004).
pubmed: 15468137
Minekus, M. et al. A standardised static in vitro digestion method suitable for food–an international consensus. Food Funct. 5, 1113–1124 (2014).
pubmed: 24803111
Perez-Moral, N. et al. Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-size exclusion chromatography (UPLC-SEC) as an efficient tool for the rapid and highly informative characterisation of biopolymers. Carbohydr. Polym. 196, 422–426 (2018).
pubmed: 29891314
pmcid: 6030444
Flanagan, B. M., Gidley, M. J. & Warren, F. J. Rapid quantification of starch molecular order through multivariate modelling of
Wang, T. L., Bogracheva, T. Y. & Hedley, C. L. Starch: as simple as A, B, C? J. Exp. Bot. 49, 481–502 (1998).