Treatment Effectiveness of Clear Aligners in Correcting Complicated and Severe Malocclusion Cases Compared to Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Systematic Review.

clear aligners clinical effectiveness crowding of teeth effectiveness invisalign orthodontic premolar extraction systematic review

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Historique:
accepted: 29 04 2023
medline: 2 5 2023
pubmed: 2 5 2023
entrez: 2 5 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This systematic review aimed to critically assess the available evidence regarding the effectiveness and efficiency of clear aligners in the comprehensive treatment of complex cases accompanied by premolars extraction. An electronic literature search by two reviewers was independently done on 27 February 2023 in the following databases without time and language limitations: Pubmed®, Scoups®, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library database, Web of Science™, and Proquest Database Open. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of any type, non-randomized clinical trials (CCT), cohort studies, and prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional studies were reviewed. The risk of bias in included studies was assessed using the Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) tool for randomized trials and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies (ROBINS-I) tool for non-randomized studies. After carefully searching the literature, six trials were included in this systematic review, three RCTs, two retrospective cohort studies, and one CCT. Two hundred eighty-three patients were included (186 females, 97 males). Three studies found that there were no differences between the clear aligners and fixed appliances when evaluations were done using the American Board of Orthodontists Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS) or the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index. Two studies found that there were some differences between predicted and achieved tooth movements when clear aligners were used in premolars extraction cases. Based on the included studies, the duration of treatment was shorter with fixed appliances than the clear aligners when applied to orthodontic extraction cases. Both clear aligners and fixed appliances were found effective in the orthodontic treatment of premolar extraction-based cases. Fixed appliances have the advantage of achieving better buccolingual inclination and occlusal contacts in a shorter treatment duration. Treatment with clear aligners might be associated with differences between predicted and achieved tooth movements. Therefore, the characteristics of these techniques should be considered when making a treatment decision.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37128600
doi: 10.7759/cureus.38311
pmc: PMC10148732
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

e38311

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023, Jaber et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
Cureus. 2023 Mar 3;15(3):e35733
pubmed: 36875255
Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Oct-Dec;9(4):513-523
pubmed: 31772456
Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 Mar-Apr;18(2):81-7
pubmed: 23916436
Eur J Orthod. 2017 Aug 01;39(4):453-461
pubmed: 28430890
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Jun;147(6):704-10
pubmed: 26038074
Cureus. 2022 May 27;14(5):e25381
pubmed: 35651986
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020 May;23(2):133-142
pubmed: 31651082
J Orthod. 2004 Jun;31(2):154-62
pubmed: 15210932
J Investig Clin Dent. 2019 Nov;10(4):e12455
pubmed: 31478355
Cureus. 2023 Jan 9;15(1):e33524
pubmed: 36636520
Cureus. 2022 Oct 10;14(10):e30147
pubmed: 36246088
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Jan 01;15(1):46-55
pubmed: 24939264
ScientificWorldJournal. 2022 Mar 7;2022:4261248
pubmed: 35295761
J Clin Orthod. 2020 May;52(5):294-301
pubmed: 32650336
Angle Orthod. 2005 Mar;75(2):177-82
pubmed: 15825779
Eur J Orthod. 2020 Jun 23;42(3):331-343
pubmed: 31758191
Angle Orthod. 2013 May;83(3):519-26
pubmed: 23075062
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919
pubmed: 27733354
Cureus. 2022 Apr 2;14(4):e23752
pubmed: 35402116
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021 Aug;7(4):591-600
pubmed: 33258297
Angle Orthod. 2015 Sep;85(5):881-9
pubmed: 25412265
J Orthod. 2004 Mar;31(1):62-70
pubmed: 15071154
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 May 15;8(5):8276-82
pubmed: 26221410
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Dec;160(6):805-813
pubmed: 34344557
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Mar;26(1):81-89
pubmed: 33876339
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Jan 23;19(1):24
pubmed: 30674307
Cureus. 2022 May 30;14(5):e25472
pubmed: 35663697
Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Jul-Aug;21(4):80-8
pubmed: 27653268
Cureus. 2022 Mar 22;14(3):e23379
pubmed: 35371870
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jun;133(6):837-45
pubmed: 18538247
Prog Orthod. 2016 Dec;17(1):33
pubmed: 27696311
Prog Orthod. 2020 Aug 24;21(1):23
pubmed: 32830306
Angle Orthod. 2019 Sep;89(5):679-687
pubmed: 30920875
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Jan 1;20(1):113-127
pubmed: 31058623
Dent Med Probl. 2019 Oct-Dec;56(4):385-394
pubmed: 31794163

Auteurs

Samer T Jaber (ST)

Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus, Damascus, SYR.

Mohammad Y Hajeer (MY)

Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus, Damascus, SYR.

Kinda Sultan (K)

Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus, Damascus, SYR.

Classifications MeSH