Exploring the Resurgence of the Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Literature Review.
Preservation
Review
Rhinoplasty
Journal
Aesthetic plastic surgery
ISSN: 1432-5241
Titre abrégé: Aesthetic Plast Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7701756
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2023
08 2023
Historique:
received:
28
02
2023
accepted:
25
03
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
3
5
2023
entrez:
2
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The underlying principles of preservation rhinoplasty (PR) center around maintaining the soft tissue envelope, dorsum, and alar cartilage through surgical manipulations and tip suture techniques. In particular, the let-down (LD) and push-down (PD) techniques have been described, although reports of indications and outcomes in the literature are sparse. A systematic review of the literature was performed using search terms "preservation" OR "let down" OR "push down" AND "rhinoplasty" on PubMed, Cochrane, SCOPUS, and EMBASE databases. Patient demographic information, operative details, and surgical outcomes were recorded. Sub-cohorts for patients who underwent LD and PD techniques were analyzed utilizing Fischer's exact test for categorical variables and Student's t test for continuous variables. Overall, there were 5967 PR patients in 30 studies in the final analysis, with 307 patients in the PD cohort and 529 patients in the LD cohort. The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire showed a significant increase of patient satisfaction after PR compared to before PR (62.13 vs 91.14; p < 0.001). There was a significantly lower rate of residual dorsal hump or recurrence of 1.3% (n = 4) in the PD when compared to 4.6% (n = 23) in LD cohorts (p = 0.02). The revision rate of PD (0%, n = 0) was also significantly lower than that of LD (5.0%, n = 25) (p < 0.001). Based on these published articles, it seems that preservation rhinoplasty is safe and efficacious procedure with improved dorsal aesthetic lines, reduced dorsal contour irregularities, and claimed excellent patient satisfaction. In particular, the PD technique has fewer reported complications and revisions than LD approach, although PD is often indicated in patients with smaller dorsal humps. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Identifiants
pubmed: 37130993
doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03345-8
pii: 10.1007/s00266-023-03345-8
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1488-1493Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.
Références
Kosins AM, Daniel RK (2020) Decision making in preservation rhinoplasty: a 100 case series with one-year follow-up. Aesthet Surg J 40(1):34–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz107
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz107
pubmed: 30958525
Goodale J (1899) A New method for the operative correction of exaggerated roman nose. Boston Med Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM189902021400503
doi: 10.1056/NEJM189902021400503
Jl G (1901) The correction of old lateral displacements of the nasal bones. Boston Med Surg J 145:538–539
doi: 10.1056/NEJM190111141452002
Olver L (1914) An operation for correcting the aquiline nasal deformity; the use of new instrument; report of a case. Boston Med Surg J 170:835–837
doi: 10.1056/NEJM191405281702205
Cottle MH (1954) Nasal roof repair and hump removal. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 60(4):408–414. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1954.00720010420002
doi: 10.1001/archotol.1954.00720010420002
pubmed: 13196786
Cottle MH, Loring RM (1946) Corrective surgery of the external nasal pyramid and the nasal septum for restoration of normal physiology. Ill Med J 90:119–135
pubmed: 20997184
Gola R (2003) Functional and esthetic rhinoplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 27(5):390–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-003-2136-9
doi: 10.1007/s00266-003-2136-9
Gola R, Nerini A, Laurent-Fyon C, Waller PY (1989) Conservative rhinoplasty of the nasal canopy. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 34(6):465–475
pubmed: 2482688
Saban Y, Daniel RK, Polselli R, Trapasso M, Palhazi P (2018) Dorsal preservation: the push down technique reassessed. Aesthet Surg J 38(2):117–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx180
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx180
pubmed: 29319787
Daniel RK (2018) The preservation rhinoplasty: a new rhinoplasty revolution. Aesthet Surg J 38(2):228–229. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx258
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx258
pubmed: 29319790
Patel PN, Abdelwahab M, Most SP (2020) A review and modification of dorsal preservation rhinoplasty techniques. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 22(2):71–79. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2020.0017
doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0017
pubmed: 32130066
pmcid: 7312707
Kosins AM (2021) Expanding indications for dorsal preservation rhinoplasty with cartilage conversion techniques. Aesthet Surg J 41(2):174–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa071
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaa071
pubmed: 32185397
Öztürk G (2021) Semi-let-down and semi-push-down preservation techniques: maintaining the intactness of the distal region. Aesthet Surg J 41(6):2Np67-np280. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa436
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaa436
Neves JC, Arancibia Tagle D, Dewes W, Larrabee W (2020) The split preservation rhinoplasty: “the Vitruvian Man split maneuver.” Eur J Plast Surg 43(3):323–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-019-01600-3
doi: 10.1007/s00238-019-01600-3
Öztürk G (2021) Combination of the push-down and let-down techniques: mix-down approaches. Aesthet Plast Surg 45(3):1140–1149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-02012-6
doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-02012-6
Öztürk G (2021) Prevention of nasal deviation related to preservation rhinoplasty in non-deviated noses using suturing approaches. Aesthet Plast Surg 45(4):1693–1702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-02105-2
doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-02105-2
Tuncel U, Aydogdu IO, Kurt A (2021) Reducing dorsal hump recurrence following push down-let down rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 41(4):428–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa145
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaa145
pubmed: 32492137
Tuncel U, Aydogdu O (2019) The probable reasons for dorsal hump problems following let-down/push-down rhinoplasty and solution proposals. Plast Reconstr Surg 144(3):378e–385e. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000005909
doi: 10.1097/prs.0000000000005909
pubmed: 31461007
Öztürk G (2021) Push down technique with ostectomy. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 66(4):329–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anplas.2020.08.004
doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2020.08.004
pubmed: 32978019
Ishida J, Ishida LC, Ishida LH, Vieira JC, Ferreira MC (1999) Treatment of the nasal hump with preservation of the cartilaginous framework. Plast Reconstr Surg 103(6):1729–1733
doi: 10.1097/00006534-199905000-00028
pubmed: 10323714
Öztürk G (2021) Combination of crossbar and let-down techniques for dorsal hump and septal correction in rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 86(5):501–507. https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000002818
doi: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002818
pubmed: 33939652
Taş BM, Erden B (2021) Comparison of nasal functional outcomes of let down rhinoplasty and open technical rhinoplasty using spreader graft. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278(2):371–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06270-7
doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06270-7
pubmed: 32789709
Dewes W, Zappelini CEM, Ferraz MBJ, Neves JC (2021) Conservative surgery of the nasal dorsum: septal pyramidal adjustment and repositioning. Facial Plast Surg 37(1):22–28. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1725102
doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1725102
pubmed: 33706384
Taş BM, Erden B (2021) Evaluation of the effect of conventional rhinoplasty with autospreader flap and let-down technique on nasal functions. Facial Plast Surg 37(3):302–305. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1722955
doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1722955
pubmed: 33556970
D’Ascanio L, Ori M, Finocchi V, Vione N, Capalbo M, Ricci G (2021) Endoscopic, “Quick” septoplasty in preservation rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 86(2):137–141. https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000002461
doi: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002461
pubmed: 32541536
Öztürk G (2020) New approaches for the let-down technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 44(5):1725–1736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01801-3
doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-01801-3
Öztürk G (2020) Push-down technique without osteotomy: a new approach. Aesthet Plast Surg 44(3):891–901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01660-y
doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-01660-y
Taglialatela Scafati S, Regalado-Briz A (2021) Piezo-assisted dorsal preservation in rhinoplasty: when and why. Aesthet Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02261-z
doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02261-z
Saban Y, de Salvador S (2021) Guidelines for dorsum preservation in primary rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 37(1):53–64. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1723827
doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1723827
pubmed: 33634452
Stergiou G, Tremp M, Finocchi V, Saban Y (2020) Functional and radiological assessment after preservation rhinoplasty-a clinical study. In Vivo 34(5):2659–2665. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.12085
doi: 10.21873/invivo.12085
pubmed: 32871797
pmcid: 7652435
Finocchi V, Vellone V, Ramieri V, de Angelis F, Marianetti TM (2021) Pisa tower concept: a new paradigm in crooked nose treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 148(1):66–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000008064
doi: 10.1097/prs.0000000000008064
pubmed: 34181604
Keyhan SO, Fallahi HR, Adham G, Cheshmi B (2020) Concomitant dorsal preservation rhinoplasty and orthognathic surgery: a technical note. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 78(9):1630.e1-1630.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2020.04.015
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.04.015
pubmed: 32417318
Özücer B, Çam OH (2020) The effectiveness of asymmetric dorsal preservation for correction of I-shaped crooked nose deformity in comparison to conventional technique. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 22(4):286–293. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2020.0067
doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0067
pubmed: 32392429
Ferreira MG, Monteiro D, Reis C, Almeida e Sousa C (2016) Spare roof technique: a middle third new technique. Facial Plast Surg 32(1):111–116. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1570503
doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1570503
pubmed: 26862972
Ferreira MG, Santos M, Do EC et al (2021) Spare roof technique versus component dorsal hump reduction: a randomized prospective study in 250 primary rhinoplasties, aesthetic and functional outcomes. Aesthet Surg J 41(3):288–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa221
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaa221
pubmed: 32722776
Abdelwahab M, Patel PN, Kandathil CK, Most SP (2021) Effect of midvault reconstruction versus preservation on lateral nasal wall stability. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 23(6):482–484. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2020.0494
doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0494
pubmed: 33555984
Alan MA, Kahraman M, Yuksel F, Yucel A (2022) Comparison of dorsal preservation and dorsal reduction rhinoplasty: analysis of nasal patency and aesthetic outcomes by rhinomanometry, NOSE and SCHNOS scales. Aesthet Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-03151-8
doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-03151-8
Fuller JC, Hilger PA (2021) Modified skoog method for hump reduction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 29(1):131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2020.09.008
doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2020.09.008
pubmed: 33220838
Jospesh J (1931) Nasenplastik und sonstige Gesichtsplastik, nebst einem Anhang über Mammaplastik und einige weitere Operationen aus dem Gebiete der ausseren Körperplastik. Br J Surg 8:99
Skoog T (1966) A method of hump reduction in rhinoplasty: a technique for preservation of the nasal roof. Arch Otolaryngol 83(3):283–287. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1966.00760020285020
doi: 10.1001/archotol.1966.00760020285020
pubmed: 5904051
Saban Y, Braccini F, Polselli R (2006) Rhinoplasty: morphodynamic anatomy of rhinoplasty interest of conservative rhinoplasty. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 127(1–2):15–22
pubmed: 16886524
Palhazi P, Daniel RK, Kosins AM (2015) The osseocartilaginous vault of the nose: anatomy and surgical observations. Aesthet Surg J 35(3):242–251. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sju079
doi: 10.1093/asj/sju079
pubmed: 25805276
Guyuron B (1998) Nasal osteotomy and airway changes. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(3):856–860
doi: 10.1097/00006534-199809010-00037
pubmed: 9727456
Abdelwahab MA, Neves CA, Patel PN, Most SP (2020) Impact of dorsal preservation rhinoplasty versus dorsal hump resection on the internal nasal valve: a quantitative radiological study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 44(3):879–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01627-z
doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-01627-z
pubmed: 32016500
Grymer LF, Gregers-Petersen C, Baymler PH (1999) Influence of lateral osteotomies in the dimensions of the nasal cavity. Laryngoscope 109(6):936–938. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199906000-00018
doi: 10.1097/00005537-199906000-00018
pubmed: 10369286
Grymer LF (1995) Reduction rhinoplasty and nasal patency: change in the cross-sectional area of the nose evaluated by acoustic rhinometry. Laryngoscope 105(4 Pt 1):429–431. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-199504000-00017
doi: 10.1288/00005537-199504000-00017
pubmed: 7715390
Finnochi V (2019) SPQR technique. Preservation Rhinoplasty Meeting. Rome, Italy