European e-Delphi process to define expert consensus on electrochemotherapy treatment indications, procedural aspects, and quality indicators in melanoma.
Journal
The British journal of surgery
ISSN: 1365-2168
Titre abrégé: Br J Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372553
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 06 2023
12 06 2023
Historique:
received:
07
10
2022
revised:
23
12
2022
accepted:
02
04
2023
medline:
14
6
2023
pubmed:
3
5
2023
entrez:
3
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Skin metastases are an important co-morbidity in melanoma. Despite broad adoption, electrochemotherapy implementation is hindered by a lack of treatment indications, uncertainty regarding procedural aspects, and the absence of quality indicators. An expert consensus may harmonize the approach among centres and facilitate comparison with other therapies. An interdisciplinary panel was recruited for a three-round e-Delphi survey. A literature-based 113-item questionnaire was proposed to 160 professionals from 53 European centres. Participants rated each item for relevance and degree of agreement on a five-point Likert scale, and received anonymous controlled feedback to allow revision. The items that reached concordant agreement in two successive iterations were included in the final consensus list. In the third round, quality indicator benchmarks were defined using a real-time Delphi method. The initial working group included 122 respondents, of whom 100 (82 per cent) completed the first round, thus qualifying for inclusion in the expert panel (49 surgeons, 29 dermatologists, 15 medical oncologists, three radiotherapists, two nurse specialists, two clinician scientists). The completion rate was 97 per cent (97 of 100) and 93 per cent (90 of 97) in the second and third rounds respectively. The final consensus list included 54 statements with benchmarks (treatment indications, (37); procedural aspects, (1); quality indicators, (16)). An expert panel achieved consensus on the use of electrochemotherapy in melanoma, with a core set of statements providing general direction to electrochemotherapy users to refine indications, align clinical practices, and promote quality assurance programmes and local audits. The residual controversial topics set future research priorities to improve patient care. Electrochemotherapy is an effective locoregional therapy for skin metastases from melanoma, a problem faced by almost half of patients with metastatic disease. The lack of comparative studies and the heterogeneity of its clinical application among centres make it challenging to support consistent, evidence-based recommendations. To address this unmet need, a three-round online survey was conducted to establish a consensus on treatment indications, standard operating procedures, and quality indicators. In the survey, a panel of 100 European melanoma experts agreed on 56 statements that can be used to improve patient selection, homogenize treatment application, and monitor outcomes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Skin metastases are an important co-morbidity in melanoma. Despite broad adoption, electrochemotherapy implementation is hindered by a lack of treatment indications, uncertainty regarding procedural aspects, and the absence of quality indicators. An expert consensus may harmonize the approach among centres and facilitate comparison with other therapies.
METHODS
An interdisciplinary panel was recruited for a three-round e-Delphi survey. A literature-based 113-item questionnaire was proposed to 160 professionals from 53 European centres. Participants rated each item for relevance and degree of agreement on a five-point Likert scale, and received anonymous controlled feedback to allow revision. The items that reached concordant agreement in two successive iterations were included in the final consensus list. In the third round, quality indicator benchmarks were defined using a real-time Delphi method.
RESULTS
The initial working group included 122 respondents, of whom 100 (82 per cent) completed the first round, thus qualifying for inclusion in the expert panel (49 surgeons, 29 dermatologists, 15 medical oncologists, three radiotherapists, two nurse specialists, two clinician scientists). The completion rate was 97 per cent (97 of 100) and 93 per cent (90 of 97) in the second and third rounds respectively. The final consensus list included 54 statements with benchmarks (treatment indications, (37); procedural aspects, (1); quality indicators, (16)).
CONCLUSION
An expert panel achieved consensus on the use of electrochemotherapy in melanoma, with a core set of statements providing general direction to electrochemotherapy users to refine indications, align clinical practices, and promote quality assurance programmes and local audits. The residual controversial topics set future research priorities to improve patient care.
Electrochemotherapy is an effective locoregional therapy for skin metastases from melanoma, a problem faced by almost half of patients with metastatic disease. The lack of comparative studies and the heterogeneity of its clinical application among centres make it challenging to support consistent, evidence-based recommendations. To address this unmet need, a three-round online survey was conducted to establish a consensus on treatment indications, standard operating procedures, and quality indicators. In the survey, a panel of 100 European melanoma experts agreed on 56 statements that can be used to improve patient selection, homogenize treatment application, and monitor outcomes.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Electrochemotherapy is an effective locoregional therapy for skin metastases from melanoma, a problem faced by almost half of patients with metastatic disease. The lack of comparative studies and the heterogeneity of its clinical application among centres make it challenging to support consistent, evidence-based recommendations. To address this unmet need, a three-round online survey was conducted to establish a consensus on treatment indications, standard operating procedures, and quality indicators. In the survey, a panel of 100 European melanoma experts agreed on 56 statements that can be used to improve patient selection, homogenize treatment application, and monitor outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37131298
pii: 7148599
doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad105
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
818-830Subventions
Organisme : IGEA
Organisme : Piccoli Punti Onlus
Investigateurs
Mauro Alaibac
(M)
Paolo Amerio
(P)
Paolo Ascierto
(P)
Giuseppe Azzarello
(G)
Susanne Baier
(S)
Eszter Baltas
(E)
Joana Bartolo
(J)
Falk Bechara
(F)
Francesco Bellucci
(F)
Giulia Bertino
(G)
Antonio Bonadies
(A)
Lorenzo Borgognoni
(L)
Mike Bourke
(M)
Alison Bracken
(A)
Paola Brandani
(P)
Matteo Brizio
(M)
Carlo Cabula
(C)
Sarah Calabrese
(S)
Luca G Campana
(LG)
Corrado Caracò
(C)
Cinzia Carriere
(C)
Sara Carvalhal
(S)
Vanna Chiarion
(V)
James Clover
(J)
Piero Covarelli
(P)
Pietro Curatolo
(P)
Corrado Dalio
(C)
Nicola di Meo
(N)
Gianluca Di Monta
(G)
Karin-A Dietrich
(KA)
Klaus Eisendle
(K)
Tommaso Fabrizio
(T)
Fabrizio Fantini
(F)
Victor Farricha
(V)
Virginia Ferraresi
(V)
Francesco Ferraù
(F)
Maria T Fierro
(MT)
Sara Galuppo
(S)
Alessandro Gatti
(A)
Julie Gehl
(J)
Till Geimer
(T)
Gianni Gerlini
(G)
Chiara Gregorelli
(C)
Ales Groselj
(A)
Michele Guida
(M)
Massimo Guidoboni
(M)
Jürg Hafner
(J)
Schapoor Hessam
(S)
Jackie Hodgetts
(J)
Jason Kelly
(J)
Erika Kis
(E)
Christian Kunte
(C)
Alastair McKenzie Ross
(AM)
Giorgio Manca
(G)
Mario Mndalà
(M)
Ugo Marone
(U)
Paolo Matteucci
(P)
Andrea Maurichi
(A)
Simone Mocellin
(S)
David Moreno-Ramirez
(D)
David Mowatt
(D)
Michael Mühlstädt
(M)
Tobias Muir
(T)
Thomas Mussack
(T)
Janja Ocvirk
(J)
Joy Odili
(J)
Judit Oláh
(J)
Antonio Orlando
(A)
Gaetano Pascoletti
(G)
Roberto Patuzzo
(R)
Howard Peach
(H)
Dario Piazzalunga
(D)
Camillo Porta
(C)
Barry Powell
(B)
Pietro Quaglino
(P)
Simone Ribero
(S)
Laura Ridolfi
(L)
Rodrigo Oom
(R)
Carlo R Rossi
(CR)
Ernesto Rossi
(E)
Roberta Rotunno
(R)
Piotr Rutkowski
(P)
Giusy Scandurra
(G)
Matteo Sepulcri
(M)
Gregor Sersa
(G)
Serena Sestini
(S)
Marko Snoj
(M)
Declan Soden
(D)
Nicola Solari
(N)
Pier F Soma
(PF)
Luca Stingeni
(L)
Davide Strippoli
(D)
Andrew Sykes
(A)
Francesca Tauceri
(F)
Alessandro Testori
(A)
Bèatrice Trigona
(B)
Angelo Turoldo
(A)
Sara Valpione
(S)
Antonella Vecchiato
(A)
Marcin Zdzienicki
(M)
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.