Revealing the roles of egg darkness and nest similarity for a cryptic parasite egg versus host's cognition: an alternate coevolutionary trajectory.
avian brood parasitism
coevolution
egg recognition
parasitic cuckoo
sensory cognition
Journal
Proceedings. Biological sciences
ISSN: 1471-2954
Titre abrégé: Proc Biol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245157
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 05 2023
10 05 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
10
05
2024
medline:
4
5
2023
pubmed:
3
5
2023
entrez:
3
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
As a text-book example of coevolution, the escalating interactions between egg mimicry by parasitic cuckoos and egg recognition by their hosts constitute a key battlefield for parasitism and anti-parasitism strategies. However, some parasite-host systems have deviated from this coevolutionary trajectory because some cuckoos do not lay mimetic eggs, while the hosts do not recognize them, even under the high costs of parasitism. The cryptic egg hypothesis was proposed to explain this puzzle, but the evidence to date is mixed and the relationship between the two components of egg crypticity, egg darkness (dim egg coloration) and nest similarity (similarity to host nest appearance), remains unknown. Here, we developed a 'field psychophysics' experimental design to dissect these components while controlling for undesired confounding factors. Our results clearly show that both egg darkness and nest similarity of cryptic eggs affect recognition by hosts, and egg darkness plays a more influential role than nest similarity. This study provides unambiguous evidence to resolve the puzzle of absent mimicry and recognition in cuckoo-host systems and explains why some cuckoo eggs were more likely to evolve dim coloration rather than similarity to host eggs or host nests.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37132235
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0103
pmc: PMC10154918
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20230103Références
Curr Zool. 2021 Sep 01;67(6):639-644
pubmed: 34805541
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Nov 6;286(1914):20182430
pubmed: 31662086
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Jan 13;8(1):201264
pubmed: 33614072
Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Mar 7;265(1394):351-8
pubmed: 9523436
Anim Cogn. 2021 Nov;24(6):1171-1177
pubmed: 33763752
Anim Cogn. 2015 Sep;18(5):1133-41
pubmed: 26118673
Dongwuxue Yanjiu. 2011 Aug;32(4):451-5
pubmed: 21842542
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 29;6:19966
pubmed: 26822039
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Apr 1;374(1769):20180200
pubmed: 30967079
Zool Res. 2020 Nov 18;41(6):726-733
pubmed: 32918406
Curr Zool. 2022 May 14;69(2):156-164
pubmed: 37092003
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 May 15;6(5):181938
pubmed: 31218030
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Feb 8;284(1848):
pubmed: 28179521
Naturwissenschaften. 2014 Dec;101(12):1009-15
pubmed: 25228350
Nature. 2003 Mar 13;422(6928):157-60
pubmed: 12634784
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Oct 7;281(1792):
pubmed: 25122227
BMC Evol Biol. 2016 Nov 25;16(1):255
pubmed: 27887566
Nature. 2005 Mar 3;434(7029):72-4
pubmed: 15744301
Curr Biol. 2009 Feb 10;19(3):235-40
pubmed: 19185495
Ecol Evol. 2019 Sep 27;9(20):11904-11910
pubmed: 31695896
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2014 Aug;89(3):688-704
pubmed: 24330159
J Exp Biol. 2015 Apr 15;218(Pt 8):1126-36
pubmed: 25617464
J Comp Psychol. 2019 Feb;133(1):46-55
pubmed: 30047742