Cash plus programming and intimate partner violence: a qualitative evaluation of the benefits of group-based platforms for delivering activities in support of the Ethiopian government's Productive Safety Net Programme (PSNP).
Public health
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
Social Interaction
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 05 2023
03 05 2023
Historique:
medline:
5
5
2023
pubmed:
4
5
2023
entrez:
3
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a public health challenge but there is evidence that cash and cash 'plus' interventions reduce IPV. An increasingly popular design feature of these kind of interventions is the group-based modality for delivering plus activities, however, evidence of the mechanisms through which this modality of delivery impacts IPV is limited. We explore how the group-based modality of delivering plus activities that complemented the Government of Ethiopia's Productive Safety Net Programme contributed to modifying intermediate outcomes on the pathway to IPV. Qualitative study using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions between February and March 2020. Data were analysed using a thematic content and gender lens approach. Findings were interpreted, refined and drafted in collaboration with our local research partners. Amhara and Oromia regions in Ethiopia. In total 115 men and women beneficiaries from the Strengthen PSNP4 Institutions and Resilience (SPIR) programme took part in the study. Fifty-eight were interviewed and 57 took part in 7 focus group discussions. We found that Village Economic and Social Associations-through which SPIR activities were delivered-improved financial security and increased economic resilience against income shocks. The group-based delivery of plus activities to couples appeared to enhance individual agency, collective power and social networks, which in turn strengthened social support, gender relations and joint decision-making. Critical reflective dialogues provided a reference group to support the shift away from social norms that condone IPV. Finally, there appeared to be gender differences, with men highlighting the financial benefits and enhanced social status afforded by the groups, whereas women's accounts focused primarily on strengthened social networks and social capital. Our study offers important insights into the mechanisms by which the group-based delivery of plus activities affects intermediate outcomes on the pathway to IPV. It underscores the importance of the modality of delivery in such programmes, and suggests that policy-makers should consider gender-specific needs as men and women might differentially benefit from interventions that enhance social capital to generate gender transformative impacts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37137564
pii: bmjopen-2022-069939
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069939
pmc: PMC10163490
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e069939Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022 Jan 20;:15248380211068136
pubmed: 35057674
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jun 08;16:488
pubmed: 27278935
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Jun;3(6):e332-40
pubmed: 26001577
Lancet. 2013 Sep 7;382(9895):859-65
pubmed: 23791474
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Jan;10(1):e148-e153
pubmed: 34838201
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Sep;212:203-218
pubmed: 30048843
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 24;15(4):e0232217
pubmed: 32330193
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Nov;67(10):1559-70
pubmed: 18771833
PLoS Med. 2013;10(5):e1001439
pubmed: 23671407
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51
pubmed: 24979285
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;67(8):971-973
pubmed: 33593144
Science. 2012 Jul 6;337(6090):49-53
pubmed: 22767921
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Feb;294:114708
pubmed: 35074558
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Dec;5(12):
pubmed: 33328199
Dev Policy Rev. 2019 Jan;37(1):129-151
pubmed: 32494112
BMJ Open. 2019 May 22;9(5):e025937
pubmed: 31122974
ISRN Nurs. 2012;2012:307271
pubmed: 22685673
Glob Health Action. 2016 Jun 20;9:31516
pubmed: 27329936
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Dec;5(12):
pubmed: 33328198
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114521
pubmed: 34750015