Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the characterization of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas.

EUS-guided biopsy Endoscopic ultrasound features Fine needle aspiration/biopsy Frantz tumor SPN Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm

Journal

World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy
ISSN: 1948-5190
Titre abrégé: World J Gastrointest Endosc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101532474

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Apr 2023
Historique:
received: 22 12 2022
revised: 17 02 2023
accepted: 29 03 2023
medline: 4 5 2023
pubmed: 4 5 2023
entrez: 4 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is an uncommon pathology of the pancreas with unpredictable malignant potential. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) assessment plays a vital role in lesion characterization and confirmation of the tissue diagnosis. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the imaging assessment of these lesions. To determine the characteristic EUS features of SPN and define its role in preoperative assessment. This was an international, multicenter, retrospective, observational study of prospective cohorts from 7 large hepatopancreaticobiliary centers. All cases with postoperative histology of SPN were included in the study. Data collected included clinical, biochemical, histological and EUS characteristics. One hundred and six patients with the diagnosis of SPN were included. The mean age was 26 years (range 9 to 70 years), with female predominance (89.6%). The most frequent clinical presentation was abdominal pain (80/106; 75.5%). The mean diameter of the lesion was 53.7 mm (range 15 to 130 mm), with the slight predominant location in the head of the pancreas (44/106; 41.5%). The majority of lesions presented with solid imaging features (59/106; 55.7%) although 33.0% (35/106) had mixed solid/cystic characteristics and 11.3% (12/106) had cystic morphology. Calcification was observed in only 4 (3.8%) cases. Main pancreatic duct dilation was uncommon, evident in only 2 cases (1.9%), whilst common bile duct dilation was observed in 5 (11.3%) cases. One patient demonstrated a double duct sign at presentation. Elastography and Doppler evaluation demonstrated inconsistent appearances with no emergence of a predictable pattern. EUS guided biopsy was performed using three different types of needles: Fine needle aspiration (67/106; 63.2%), fine needle biopsy (37/106; 34.9%), and Sonar Trucut (2/106; 1.9%). The diagnosis was conclusive in 103 (97.2%) cases. Ninety-seven patients were treated surgically (91.5%) and the post-surgical SPN diagnosis was confirmed in all cases. During the 2-year follow-up period, no recurrence was observed. SPN presented primarily as a solid lesion on endosonographic assessment. The lesion tended to be located in the head or body of the pancreas. There was no consistent characteristic pattern apparent on either elastography or Doppler assessment. Similarly SPN did not frequently cause stricture of the pancreatic duct or common bile duct. Importantly, we confirmed that EUS-guided biopsy was an efficient and safe diagnostic tool. The needle type used does not appear to have a significant impact on the diagnostic yield. Overall SPN remains a challenging diagnosis based on EUS imaging with no pathognomonic features. EUS guided biopsy remains the gold standard in establishing the diagnosis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is an uncommon pathology of the pancreas with unpredictable malignant potential. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) assessment plays a vital role in lesion characterization and confirmation of the tissue diagnosis. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the imaging assessment of these lesions.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To determine the characteristic EUS features of SPN and define its role in preoperative assessment.
METHODS METHODS
This was an international, multicenter, retrospective, observational study of prospective cohorts from 7 large hepatopancreaticobiliary centers. All cases with postoperative histology of SPN were included in the study. Data collected included clinical, biochemical, histological and EUS characteristics.
RESULTS RESULTS
One hundred and six patients with the diagnosis of SPN were included. The mean age was 26 years (range 9 to 70 years), with female predominance (89.6%). The most frequent clinical presentation was abdominal pain (80/106; 75.5%). The mean diameter of the lesion was 53.7 mm (range 15 to 130 mm), with the slight predominant location in the head of the pancreas (44/106; 41.5%). The majority of lesions presented with solid imaging features (59/106; 55.7%) although 33.0% (35/106) had mixed solid/cystic characteristics and 11.3% (12/106) had cystic morphology. Calcification was observed in only 4 (3.8%) cases. Main pancreatic duct dilation was uncommon, evident in only 2 cases (1.9%), whilst common bile duct dilation was observed in 5 (11.3%) cases. One patient demonstrated a double duct sign at presentation. Elastography and Doppler evaluation demonstrated inconsistent appearances with no emergence of a predictable pattern. EUS guided biopsy was performed using three different types of needles: Fine needle aspiration (67/106; 63.2%), fine needle biopsy (37/106; 34.9%), and Sonar Trucut (2/106; 1.9%). The diagnosis was conclusive in 103 (97.2%) cases. Ninety-seven patients were treated surgically (91.5%) and the post-surgical SPN diagnosis was confirmed in all cases. During the 2-year follow-up period, no recurrence was observed.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
SPN presented primarily as a solid lesion on endosonographic assessment. The lesion tended to be located in the head or body of the pancreas. There was no consistent characteristic pattern apparent on either elastography or Doppler assessment. Similarly SPN did not frequently cause stricture of the pancreatic duct or common bile duct. Importantly, we confirmed that EUS-guided biopsy was an efficient and safe diagnostic tool. The needle type used does not appear to have a significant impact on the diagnostic yield. Overall SPN remains a challenging diagnosis based on EUS imaging with no pathognomonic features. EUS guided biopsy remains the gold standard in establishing the diagnosis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37138939
doi: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i4.273
pmc: PMC10150282
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

273-284

Informations de copyright

©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Références

Oman Med J. 2013 Nov;28(6):441-4
pubmed: 24223249
Pancreas. 2014 Apr;43(3):331-7
pubmed: 24622060
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2016 Apr;8(2):102-8
pubmed: 27252816
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Mar 14;16(10):1209-14
pubmed: 20222163
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Sep 16;10(9):145-155
pubmed: 30283597
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2021 Nov 19;29(3):151-162
pubmed: 35702168
Semin Diagn Pathol. 2014 Nov;31(6):484-490
pubmed: 25524568
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020 Jul 1;144(7):829-837
pubmed: 31958381
In Vivo. 2017 Jul-Aug;31(4):501-510
pubmed: 28652415
Diagn Cytopathol. 2021 Jul;49(7):E242-E246
pubmed: 33372731
BMJ. 2004 Jul 31;329(7460):244-5
pubmed: 15284126
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;114(5):597-601
pubmed: 27471041
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Jun;200(6):965-72
pubmed: 15922212

Auteurs

Katarzyna M Pawlak (KM)

Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital of The Ministry of Interior and Administration, Szczecin 01-218, Poland.

Nadeem Tehami (N)

Interventional Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, 3AX PO, United Kingdom.

Ben Maher (B)

Interventional Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, 3AX PO, United Kingdom.

Shujaath Asif (S)

Consultant Gastroenterologist, AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad 500032, India.

Krishn Kant Rawal (KK)

Department of Gastroenterology, Prime Institute of Digestive Sciences, Rajkot 360001, India.

Daniel Vasile Balaban (DV)

Department of Gastroenterology, Central Military Emergency University Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 010011, Romania.

Mohammed Tag-Adeen (M)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Qena Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, Qena 83511, Egypt.
Department of Endoscopy, Shefa Al-Orman Hospital, Luxor 85951, Egypt.

Fahd Ghalim (F)

Interventional Endoscopy Unit, Sainte Marie Hospital, OSNY 95520, France.

Wael A Abbas (WA)

Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Assuit University, Assuit 71511, Egypt.

Elsayed Ghoneem (E)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35511, Egypt.

Khaled Ragab (K)

Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Giza 12511, Egypt.

Mahmoud El-Ansary (M)

Department of Hepatology & Gastroenterology, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Giza 12511, Egypt.

Shanil Kadir (S)

Department of Gastroenterology, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, Karachi 75900, Pakistan.

Sunil Amin (S)

Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 32118, United States.

Keith Siau (K)

Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, Cornwall, United Kingdom.

Anna Wiechowska-Kozlowska (A)

Endoscopy Unit, Hospital of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, Szczecin 71-146, Poland.

Klaus Mönkemüller (K)

Department of Gastroenterology, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia, AL 35294, United States.

Dalia Abdelfatah (D)

Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo 11511, Egypt.

Abeer Abdellatef (A)

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kasr Al-Aini School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo 11511, Egypt.

Sundeep Lakhtakia (S)

Consultant Gastroenterologist, AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad 500032, India.

Hussein Hassan Okasha (HH)

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kasr Al-Aini School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo 11451, Egypt. hussein_okasha@kasralainy.edu.eg.

Classifications MeSH