"Vagina" Is Not a Bad Word: Historical and Contemporary Censorship of the Word "Vagina".


Journal

Urology
ISSN: 1527-9995
Titre abrégé: Urology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0366151

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Historique:
received: 23 01 2023
revised: 13 04 2023
accepted: 18 04 2023
medline: 14 8 2023
pubmed: 5 5 2023
entrez: 4 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To characterize instances of censorship of the word "vagina" to better understand perceptions and behaviors surrounding the word. Internet and relevant database (PubMed, Academic OneFile, Proquest, Health Business Elite, etc) searches were conducted for the words "vagina," "censor," and related wildcard terms. Search results were filtered by three independent reviewers for relevance. Related articles were summarized and reviewed for common themes. In addition, interviews were conducted with three people who have personal experience with censorship of the word "vagina." Interviews were transcribed and also reviewed for common themes. Examples of censorship of the word "vagina" were compiled, and several themes were identified: (1) Policies surrounding censorship are unclear; (2) Policies appear highly variable; (3) There are differing standards between references to male and female genitalia; and (4) Objections often call the use of "vagina" overtly sexual, profane, or unprofessional. The word "vagina" is censored across multiple platforms and policies regarding censorship are inconsistent and unclear. Pervasive censorship of the word "vagina" perpetuates a culture of ignorance and shame about women's bodies. Until we normalize the word "vagina," we cannot make progress on women's pelvic health.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37141975
pii: S0090-4295(23)00372-2
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.04.014
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

213-221

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

DECLARATION OF COMPETING INTEREST None declared.

Auteurs

Shreeya Popat (S)

Section of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA.

Rainey Horwitz (R)

Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.

Karyn S Eilber (KS)

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

Una J Lee (UJ)

Section of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: una.lee@virginiamason.org.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH