An implementation evaluation of the physical activity counseling for in-patients with major depressive disorder (PACINPAT) intervention: a randomized controlled trial.
Depression
Intervention implementation
Physical activity counseling
Process evaluation
Journal
BMC psychiatry
ISSN: 1471-244X
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968559
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 05 2023
04 05 2023
Historique:
received:
08
08
2022
accepted:
28
04
2023
medline:
8
5
2023
pubmed:
5
5
2023
entrez:
4
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The physical activity counseling for in-patients with major depression (PACINPAT) randomized controlled trial was launched to tackle physical inactivity for in-patients with major depressive disorder. Evidence shows that despite potential treatment effects, physical inactivity is prevalent in this population. To contribute to the assessment of how this in-person and remote, theory-based, individually tailored intervention was designed, received and effected behavior, the aim of this study was to evaluate its implementation. This implementation evaluation was conducted within a multi-center randomized controlled trial according to the Process Evaluation Framework by the Medical Research Council including the analysis of reach, dose, fidelity and adaptation. Data were collected from the implementers and the participants randomized to the intervention group of the trial. The study sample comprised 95 physically inactive in-patients (mean age: 42 years, 53% women) with diagnosed major depressive disorder. The intervention reached the intended population (N = 95 in-patients enrolled in the study). The intervention dose varied between early dropouts (counseling sessions, M = 1.67) and study completers with some participants receiving a low dose (counseling sessions, M = 10.05) and high dose (counseling sessions, M = 25.37). Differences in the attendance groups were recognizable in the first two counseling sessions (duration of counseling session about 45 min in early dropouts versus 60 min for study completers). Fidelity of the in-person counseling content was partly achieved and adapted, whereas that of the remote counseling content was well achieved. Participants (86% at follow up) reported satisfaction with the implementers of the intervention. Adaptations were made to content, delivery mode and dose. The PACINPAT trial was implemented in the intended population, in varying doses and with adaptations made to in-person counseling content and remote counseling dose. These findings are key to understanding outcome analyses within the PACINPAT trial, further developing interventions and contributing to implementation research among in-patients with depressive disorders. ISRCTN, ISRCTN10469580 , registered on 3
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The physical activity counseling for in-patients with major depression (PACINPAT) randomized controlled trial was launched to tackle physical inactivity for in-patients with major depressive disorder. Evidence shows that despite potential treatment effects, physical inactivity is prevalent in this population. To contribute to the assessment of how this in-person and remote, theory-based, individually tailored intervention was designed, received and effected behavior, the aim of this study was to evaluate its implementation.
METHODS
This implementation evaluation was conducted within a multi-center randomized controlled trial according to the Process Evaluation Framework by the Medical Research Council including the analysis of reach, dose, fidelity and adaptation. Data were collected from the implementers and the participants randomized to the intervention group of the trial.
RESULTS
The study sample comprised 95 physically inactive in-patients (mean age: 42 years, 53% women) with diagnosed major depressive disorder. The intervention reached the intended population (N = 95 in-patients enrolled in the study). The intervention dose varied between early dropouts (counseling sessions, M = 1.67) and study completers with some participants receiving a low dose (counseling sessions, M = 10.05) and high dose (counseling sessions, M = 25.37). Differences in the attendance groups were recognizable in the first two counseling sessions (duration of counseling session about 45 min in early dropouts versus 60 min for study completers). Fidelity of the in-person counseling content was partly achieved and adapted, whereas that of the remote counseling content was well achieved. Participants (86% at follow up) reported satisfaction with the implementers of the intervention. Adaptations were made to content, delivery mode and dose.
CONCLUSION
The PACINPAT trial was implemented in the intended population, in varying doses and with adaptations made to in-person counseling content and remote counseling dose. These findings are key to understanding outcome analyses within the PACINPAT trial, further developing interventions and contributing to implementation research among in-patients with depressive disorders.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ISRCTN, ISRCTN10469580 , registered on 3
Identifiants
pubmed: 37143013
doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04834-5
pii: 10.1186/s12888-023-04834-5
pmc: PMC10161407
doi:
Banques de données
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN10469580']
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
316Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Lancet. 2018 Nov 24;392(10161):2299-2312
pubmed: 30396512
Br J Sports Med. 2023 Feb 1;:
pubmed: 36731907
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 30;9:CD010395
pubmed: 24085594
Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):219-29
pubmed: 22818936
Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 1;175(7):631-648
pubmed: 29690792
Physiotherapy. 2021 Dec;113:8-11
pubmed: 34555674
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 02;7:838
pubmed: 27313559
J Behav Med. 2019 Dec;42(6):1104-1116
pubmed: 31065889
J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 15;190:457-466
pubmed: 26551405
Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 7;8(1):266
pubmed: 31699136
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Oct;6(10):e1077-e1086
pubmed: 30193830
Trials. 2019 Jun 20;20(1):367
pubmed: 31221205
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 24;19(1):636
pubmed: 31126260
BMC Public Health. 2011 Dec 15;11:934
pubmed: 22168312
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 May;73(5):691-705
pubmed: 22486599
Psychol Health. 2014;29(10):1206-25
pubmed: 24785393
Depress Anxiety. 2019 Jan;36(1):39-53
pubmed: 30334597
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 23;6(6):e011560
pubmed: 27338884
J Phys Act Health. 2011 Aug;8(6):794-803
pubmed: 21832294
BMJ. 2012 Jun 06;344:e2758
pubmed: 22674921
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95
pubmed: 12900694
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258
pubmed: 25791983
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1989;17:423-73
pubmed: 2676554
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Jul;28(4):e13073
pubmed: 31087419
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061
pubmed: 34593508
Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7
pubmed: 10474547
Int J Obes (Lond). 2006 Apr;30(4):652-60
pubmed: 16130028
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:289-314
pubmed: 26361052
Eur Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 22;63(1):e95
pubmed: 33087211
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
J Affect Disord. 2017 Mar 01;210:139-150
pubmed: 28033521
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Apr;52(4):381-390
pubmed: 28154893
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 23;16(14):
pubmed: 31340528
Front Artif Intell. 2019 Dec 17;2:30
pubmed: 33733119
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 16;20(7):e10112
pubmed: 30012547
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2020 Nov;31(4):515-526
pubmed: 32981575
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jan 22;18(1):16
pubmed: 33482837