Characteristics of Participants in the American Urological Association Quality (AQUA) Registry and Early Impact of Participation on Quality of Care.

electronic health records health services quality of health care registries urology

Journal

Urology practice
ISSN: 2352-0787
Titre abrégé: Urol Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101635343

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Historique:
medline: 1 3 2021
pubmed: 1 3 2021
entrez: 5 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The American Urological Association Quality Registry (AQUA) is an approved Qualified Clinical Data Repository that was created in 2013 to serve as a platform of quality assessment and improvement. Little is known about how such specialty specific platforms are adopted and used. We describe AQUA participants and report early impact on quality metrics. We compared characteristics of practices and urologists participating in AQUA from 2014-2017 to those of the broader urologist workforce as reported in the 2017 American Urological Association Census, and examined pass rates of 4 measures reported to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services after participation in AQUA. Participation increased during the first 4 years and included >125 practices and 1,148 urologists (9.2% of practicing U.S. urologists). Of AQUA participants 97.6% were in private practice, 1.9% were in academic practice and the rest (0.5%) were employed by private or public hospitals, compared to 59.1%, 25.5% and 11.2%, respectively, of urologists nationally. Among AQUA participants 95.9% lived in metropolitan areas, compared to 89.9% of urologists nationally. A total of 17 quality measures were reported to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services through AQUA, of which 4 were urology specific and 13 were crosscutting. The average pass rate across the 4 select urological measures was 31.1% prior to AQUA dashboard access and 48.8% after access was gained, a 56.9% improvement (17.1% absolute difference). Early participants in AQUA were mostly community practitioners. Participation in AQUA seemed to facilitate quality score improvements, although whether this was due to improved measurement vs clinical care is unknown at this time.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37145621
doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000198
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

209-216

Auteurs

J B Shelton (JB)

UCLA Department of Urology, Los Angeles, California.

D Pichardo (D)

AUA Statistical Consulting Division, Linthicum, Maryland.

W Meeks (W)

AUA Statistical Consulting Division, Linthicum, Maryland.

R Suh (R)

Urology of Indiana, Greenwood, Indiana.

E L Wood (EL)

UCLA Department of Urology, Los Angeles, California.

N Smith (N)

UCLA Department of Urology, Los Angeles, California.

M Nolin (M)

American Urological Association, Linthicum, Maryland.

K Ross (K)

American Urological Association, Linthicum, Maryland.

S Schlossberg (S)

American Urological Association, Linthicum, Maryland.

S Wolf (S)

University of Texas, Austin, Texas.

R Fang (R)

AUA Statistical Consulting Division, Linthicum, Maryland.
American Urological Association, Linthicum, Maryland.

M R Cooperberg (MR)

Department of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Classifications MeSH