A unitary mechanism underlies adaptation to both local and global environmental statistics in time perception.


Journal

PLoS computational biology
ISSN: 1553-7358
Titre abrégé: PLoS Comput Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101238922

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2023
Historique:
received: 31 12 2022
accepted: 19 04 2023
revised: 17 05 2023
medline: 19 5 2023
pubmed: 5 5 2023
entrez: 5 5 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Our duration estimation flexibly adapts to the statistical properties of the temporal context. Humans and non-human species exhibit a perceptual bias towards the mean of durations previously observed as well as serial dependence, a perceptual bias towards the duration of recently processed events. Here we asked whether those two phenomena arise from a unitary mechanism or reflect the operation of two distinct systems that adapt separately to the global and local statistics of the environment. We employed a set of duration reproduction tasks in which the target duration was sampled from distributions with different variances and means. The central tendency and serial dependence biases were jointly modulated by the range and the variance of the prior, and these effects were well-captured by a unitary mechanism model in which temporal expectancies are updated after each trial based on perceptual observations. Alternative models that assume separate mechanisms for global and local contextual effects failed to capture the empirical results.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37146089
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011116
pii: PCOMPBIOL-D-22-01918
pmc: PMC10191274
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e1011116

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: RI is a co-founder with equity in Magnetic Tides, Inc.

Références

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 27;111(21):7867-72
pubmed: 24821771
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 10;114(2):412-417
pubmed: 28007982
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Mar;147:60-7
pubmed: 23896562
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Nov;74(8):1819-41
pubmed: 23055085
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004 Apr;14(2):225-32
pubmed: 15082329
J Neurosci. 2015 Oct 14;35(41):13912-6
pubmed: 26468192
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Apr;61(4):569-87
pubmed: 18938276
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Jul;9(7):875-7
pubmed: 16732276
Trends Cogn Sci. 1997 May;1(2):56-61
pubmed: 21223864
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 25;9(6):e100803
pubmed: 24963624
Sci Rep. 2020 May 29;10(1):8767
pubmed: 32472083
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Jul;12(7):273-80
pubmed: 18539519
Cognition. 2013 Dec;129(3):579-85
pubmed: 24060605
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Jul;21(7):493-497
pubmed: 28549826
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Feb;146(2):182-193
pubmed: 28134542
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016 Apr;8:200-206
pubmed: 27695705
Elife. 2021 Jun 24;10:
pubmed: 34165079
Curr Biol. 2015 Oct 19;25(20):2599-609
pubmed: 26455307
Sci Adv. 2022 Jan 14;8(2):eabk2480
pubmed: 35020432
Curr Biol. 2014 Nov 3;24(21):2569-74
pubmed: 25283781
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 24;12(1):10746
pubmed: 35750891
PLoS One. 2007 Nov 28;2(11):e1264
pubmed: 18043760
PLoS One. 2011 May 09;6(5):e19815
pubmed: 21573020
PLoS Biol. 2019 Mar 5;17(3):e3000144
pubmed: 30835720
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 12;11(7):e0158921
pubmed: 27404269
J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 23;31(47):17220-9
pubmed: 22114288
Elife. 2020 Jun 01;9:
pubmed: 32479264
Nature. 2004 Jan 15;427(6971):244-7
pubmed: 14724638
PLoS One. 2010 Sep 10;5(9):
pubmed: 20844766
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 01;6:32239
pubmed: 27582115
J Vis. 2021 May 3;21(5):6
pubmed: 33956059
Nat Neurosci. 2014 May;17(5):738-43
pubmed: 24686785
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(11):e1002771
pubmed: 23209386
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 22;118(25):
pubmed: 34161261
Nat Neurosci. 2010 Aug;13(8):1020-6
pubmed: 20581842
Neuroimage. 2015 Jun;113:268-78
pubmed: 25818689
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2245-2253
pubmed: 29582377
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Apr;185:87-95
pubmed: 29432991
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Sep;60(9):1289-302
pubmed: 17676559
Nat Commun. 2018 Feb 1;9(1):469
pubmed: 29391392
J Vis. 2009 Feb 06;9(2):4.1-11
pubmed: 19271914

Auteurs

Tianhe Wang (T)

School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Department of Psychology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.

Yingrui Luo (Y)

School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Richard B Ivry (RB)

Department of Psychology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.

Jonathan S Tsay (JS)

Department of Psychology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.

Ernst Pöppel (E)

School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Institute of Medical Psychology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.

Yan Bao (Y)

School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Institute of Medical Psychology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Articles similaires

Humans Medical Futility Turkey Qualitative Research Terminal Care
Animals Optogenetics Visual Cortex Neurons Mice
1.00
Humans Personality Judgment Choice Behavior Male
Humans Cross-Sectional Studies Male Germany Female

Classifications MeSH