Investigation of the Sectorized Corneal Thickness of Eyes With Corneal Endothelial Dysfunction Using Anterior-Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.
Journal
Cornea
ISSN: 1536-4798
Titre abrégé: Cornea
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8216186
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jun 2023
01 Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
18
02
2022
accepted:
25
03
2022
medline:
8
5
2023
pubmed:
5
5
2023
entrez:
5
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to investigate the sectorized corneal thickness of eyes with corneal endothelial dysfunction using anterior-segment optical coherence tomography. We retrospectively collected anterior-segment optical coherence tomography data conducted before endothelial keratoplasty on 53 eyes of 53 patients with corneal endothelial dysfunctions including Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, bullous keratopathy (BK) after trabeculectomy, and BK after laser iridotomy and from 18 normal eyes of 18 subjects. The imaging points were divided into 17 sectors. The mean for each sector was calculated and compared with the corresponding superior/inferior and temporal/nasal sectors. In the normal eyes, the superior sectors were thicker than the inferior and the temporal sectors thinner than the nasal. In the diseased eyes, the superior sectors were thicker than the inferior in all subgroups; however, this tendency was no longer observed after the values were divided by the mean for the normal eyes. No significant differences were found on horizontal comparisons; however, after the values were divided by the mean for the normal eyes, the temporal sectors were thicker than the nasal. When comparing the values between the with-hole and the without-hole sides in the BK after laser iridotomy eyes, the sectors on the with-hole side were thicker than the other side. Corneal thickness of endothelial dysfunction was thicker in the superior sectors than the inferior but at a similar level to normal eyes. No significant differences were found for horizontal comparisons but, based on comparison with the normal eyes, the temporal sectors were thicker than the nasal.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37146291
doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003061
pii: 00003226-202306000-00009
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
714-718Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.
Références
Adamis AP, Filatov V, Tripathi BJ, et al. Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy of the cornea. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993;38:149–168.
Soh YQ, Peh GS, Mehta JS. Evolving therapies for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. Regen Med. 2018;13:97–115.
Arnavielle S, Lafontaine PO, Bidot S, et al. Corneal endothelial cell changes after trabeculectomy and deep sclerectomy. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:324–328.
Ono T, Iida M, Sakisaka T, et al. Effect of laser peripheral iridotomy using argon and neodymium-YAG lasers on corneal endothelial cell density: 7-year longitudinal evaluation. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2018;62:216–220.
Wang PX, Koh VT, Loon SC. Laser iridotomy and the corneal endothelium: a systemic review. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:604–616.
Mishima S. Clinical investigations on the corneal endothelium. Ophthalmology. 1982;89:525–530.
Price MO, Mehta JS, Jurkunas UV, et al. Corneal endothelial dysfunction: evolving understanding and treatment options. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021;82:100904.
Lee WB, Jacobs DS, Musch DC, et al. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1818–1830.
Park CY, Lee JK, Gore PK, et al. Keratoplasty in the United States: a 10-year review from 2005 through 2014. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:2432–2442.
Prabhu SS, Kaakeh R, Sugar A, et al. Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in the United States. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155:45–53 e41.
Price MO, Calhoun P, Kollman C, et al. Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty: ten-year endothelial cell loss compared with penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1421–1427.
Tan DTH, Dart JKG, Holland EJ, et al. Corneal transplantation. Lancet. 2012;379:1749–1761.
Anshu A, Price MO, Price FW. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: long-term graft survival and risk factors for failure in eyes with preexisting glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:1982–1987.
Birbal RS, Tong CM, Dapena I, et al. Clinical outcomes of descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with a glaucoma drainage device. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;199:150–158.
Bonnet C, Ghaffari R, Alkadi T, et al. Long-Term outcomes of descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with prior glaucoma surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;218:288–295.
Omoto T, Toyono T, Inoue T, et al. Comparison of 5-year clinical results of descemet and non-descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2020;39:573–577.
Nishino T, Kobayashi A, Yokogawa H, et al. A 10-year review of underlying diseases for endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK/DMEK) in a tertiary referral hospital in Japan. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:1359–1365.
Wang SB, Cornish EE, Grigg JR, et al. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography and its clinical applications. Clin Exp Optom. 2019;102:195–207.
Lim SH. Clinical applications of anterior segment optical coherence tomography. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:605729.
Schroder S, Langenbucher A, Schrecker J. Comparison of corneal elevation and pachymetry measurements made by two state of the art corneal tomographers with different measurement principles. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0223770.
Gharieb HM, Ashour DM, Saleh MI, et al. Measurement of central corneal thickness using Orbscan 3, Pentacam HR and ultrasound pachymetry in normal eyes. Int Ophthalmol. 2020;40:1759–1764.
Ueno Y, Hiraoka T, Miyazaki M, et al. Corneal thickness profile and posterior corneal astigmatism in normal corneas. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:1072–1078.
Saito A, Ito M, Ikeda T, et al. Comparison of corneal thickness profile and age-related changes using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. J Eye. 2021;38:197–201.
Galgauskas S, Norvydaite D, Krasauskaite D, et al. Age-related changes in corneal thickness and endothelial characteristics. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1445–1450.
Tananuvat N, Khumchoo N. Corneal thickness and endothelial morphology in Normal Thai eyes. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20:167.
Hashmani N, Hashmani S, Murad A, et al. Effect of demographic variables on the regional corneal pachymetry. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2019;8:324–329.
Khoramnia R, Rabsilber TM, Auffarth GU. Central and peripheral pachymetry measurements according to age using the Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:830–836.
Lee J, Mori Y, Ogata M, et al. Central and peripheral corneal endothelial cell analysis with slit-scanning wide-field contact specular microscopy: agreement with noncontact specular microscopy. Cornea. 2019;38:1137–1141.
Ang LP, Higashihara H, Sotozono C, et al. Argon laser iridotomy-induced bullous keratopathy a growing problem in Japan. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:1613–1615.
Lim LS, Ho CL, Ang LP, et al. Inferior corneal decompensation following laser peripheral iridotomy in the superior iris. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:166–168.
Maslin JS, Teng CC, Chadha N, et al. Effect of supine body position on central corneal thickness. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;44:678–683.
Napoli PE, Nioi M, Gabiati L, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of post-mortem central corneal thickness measurements using a portable optical coherence tomography system in humans: a prospective multicenter study. Sci Rep. 2020;10:14508.