Noise Produced by Neonatal Ventilators Inside and Outside of the Incubators.


Journal

Respiratory care
ISSN: 1943-3654
Titre abrégé: Respir Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7510357

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Nov 2023
Historique:
pmc-release: 01 12 2024
medline: 27 11 2023
pubmed: 6 5 2023
entrez: 5 5 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Insufficient data are available about the noise produced by modern neonatal ventilators. We aimed to measure their noise under different ventilatory modes and parameters. This was a bench study measuring the noise produced by 9 neonatal ventilators set in conventional or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), nasal mask-delivered CPAP with variable- or continuous-flow configuration, or bi-level positive airway pressure (considered as noninvasive ventilation [NIV]). Conventional ventilation and HFOV were tested in 2 distinct settings with moderate or higher parameters. Sound measurements were performed inside and outside an incubator mimicking the clinical setting and using a high-end meter meeting the international ISO 226:2003 standard. Four ventilators remained below the internationally recommended safety threshold but only for measurements outside the incubator. Conventional ventilation (49.1 [3.4] dBA) and HFOV (56.3 [5.2] dBA) were the least and most noisy respiratory support technique, respectively. Noise was greater inside than outside the incubators ( Modern ventilators often produce relevant noise, independent of the respiratory support modality, with acceptable noise levels being measured only outside the incubator. Better results were achieved with Servo-u, VN500, and Fabian family devices.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Insufficient data are available about the noise produced by modern neonatal ventilators. We aimed to measure their noise under different ventilatory modes and parameters.
METHODS METHODS
This was a bench study measuring the noise produced by 9 neonatal ventilators set in conventional or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), nasal mask-delivered CPAP with variable- or continuous-flow configuration, or bi-level positive airway pressure (considered as noninvasive ventilation [NIV]). Conventional ventilation and HFOV were tested in 2 distinct settings with moderate or higher parameters. Sound measurements were performed inside and outside an incubator mimicking the clinical setting and using a high-end meter meeting the international ISO 226:2003 standard.
RESULTS RESULTS
Four ventilators remained below the internationally recommended safety threshold but only for measurements outside the incubator. Conventional ventilation (49.1 [3.4] dBA) and HFOV (56.3 [5.2] dBA) were the least and most noisy respiratory support technique, respectively. Noise was greater inside than outside the incubators (
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Modern ventilators often produce relevant noise, independent of the respiratory support modality, with acceptable noise levels being measured only outside the incubator. Better results were achieved with Servo-u, VN500, and Fabian family devices.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37147103
pii: respcare.10989
doi: 10.4187/respcare.10989
pmc: PMC10676250
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1693-1700

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 by Daedalus Enterprises.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Dr De Luca discloses relationships with Getinge and Vyaire. The remaining authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

Références

Clin Perinatol. 2021 Dec;48(4):761-782
pubmed: 34774208
Indian J Pediatr. 2009 May;76(5):475-8
pubmed: 19390816
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2012 Oct;47(10):1012-8
pubmed: 22328295
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016 Jul;51(7):705-12
pubmed: 26918535
Pediatrics. 1997 Oct;100(4):724-7
pubmed: 9836852
Respir Care. 2022 Jul;67(7):850-856
pubmed: 35610034
Chest. 1995 Oct;108(4):1026-9
pubmed: 7555114
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 27;1:CD010333
pubmed: 31986231
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Jan;26(1):84-7
pubmed: 10663285
Am J Med Qual. 2018 Mar/Apr;33(2):177-184
pubmed: 28587516
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2019 Aug;54(8):1304-1310
pubmed: 31091025
J Crit Care. 2016 Dec;36:111-115
pubmed: 27546758
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jul;98:43-47
pubmed: 28583502
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008 Mar;93(2):F132-4
pubmed: 18089628
J Pediatr. 2019 Jan;204:157-161
pubmed: 30268396
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Oct;76(10):1490-3
pubmed: 22824198
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 Aug;55(8):1955-1962
pubmed: 32460445
J Perinatol. 1995 Nov-Dec;15(6):448-55
pubmed: 8648453
J Perinatol. 2018 Mar;38(3):271-277
pubmed: 29196736
Children (Basel). 2021 Aug 16;8(8):
pubmed: 34438595
Child Health Nurs Res. 2020 Apr;26(2):296-308
pubmed: 35004473
Cureus. 2021 Nov 8;13(11):e19353
pubmed: 34909314
Ear Hear. 1996 Oct;17(5):361-73
pubmed: 8909884
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Dec;36(12):2094-100
pubmed: 20857278

Auteurs

Lea Bergez (L)

Division of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, "A.Beclere" Medical Center, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, APHP, Paris, France.

Gilles Jourdain (G)

Division of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, "A.Beclere" Medical Center, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, APHP, Paris, France.

Daniele De Luca (D)

Division of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, "A.Beclere" Medical Center, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, APHP, Paris, France; and Physiopathology and Therapeutic Innovation Unit-INSERM U999, Paris Saclay University, Paris, France. dm.deluca@icloud.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH